Search

Background: Syphilis is a re-emerging infection. Sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics and GPs are important providers of STI care in the Netherlands. The role of GPs in syphilis care is assumed to be small, since most men who have sex with men (MSM) visit STI clinics for STI care. Aim: To explore the role of GPs in the diagnosis and treatment of syphilis. Design & setting: Data on syphilis diagnostics by GPs in Amsterdam between 2011 and 2017 were retrieved from laboratories, covering 90% of the GPs. The study also used the academic GPs' network database to explore the management of syphilis by GPs between 2013 and 2018. Method: Syphilis tests requested by GPs were analysed and compared with annual reports of the STI clinic. Patients with an International Classification of Primary Care-1 (ICPC-1) syphilis code were identified in the GP database. Cases diagnosed by the GP were evaluated whether they were treated by the GP or referred to secondary care. Results: In the laboratory database, GPs had diagnosed syphilis 522 times, compared with 2515 times by the STI clinics. Based on the 90% coverage of GPs, the contribution of all Amsterdam's GPs was 19% of the total number of diagnoses. Consequently, the annual incidence of syphilis diagnosed by the GP was 10.2 per 100 000 inhabitants. Of the 43 cases identified in the GP database, six (14.0%) were referred and 33 (76.7%) were treated by a GP. Conclusion: Although for an individual GP, syphilis is rare to diagnose, GPs in Amsterdam do contribute to the rate of syphilis diagnosis and appear to treat the majority of cases that they have diagnosed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is associated with adverse health effects in older patients. PIP comprises prescription of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs). Objective: to estimate the prevalence of PIMs and PPOs among older patients in primary care. Design: retrospective longitudinal study. Setting: routinely collected data of 182,000 patients of 49 general practitioners (GPs) gathered in the GPs' database of the Academic Medical Center of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Subjects: in each studied year, all patients who were aged 65 years and older at 1st January. Methods: the prevalence of patients with at least one PIM and patients with at least one PPO was measured in 8 subsequent years (2007-14) by application of the Screening Tool of Older Persons potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP)/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START) criteria. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate trends in the prevalence of PIMs and PPOs over the years. Results: on average, 4,537 patients were included per investigated year. The mean prevalence of ≥1 PIM was 34.7% (range 34.0-35.6%) and of ≥1 PPO 84.8% (range 77.4-90.6%). Examples were the prescription of salicylates without a proper indication and the absence of a therapeutically indicated vitamin D prescription. The prevalence of ≥1 PPOs showed a statistically significant decrease over the investigated years (OR 0.87, P < 0.001), whereas the prevalence of PIMs did not change significantly. Conclusions: this study underscores the need for more attention to medication prescribing to older patients. The prevalence of PIP among older patients in primary care is substantial and the prevalence of PIMs did not decrease over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The ICH E7 guideline intends to improve the knowledge about medicines in geriatric patients. As a legislative document, it might not reflect the needs of healthcare professionals. This study investigated what information healthcare professionals, regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical industries consider necessary for rational drug prescribing to older individuals. Methods and Findings: A 29-item-questionnaire was composed, considering the representation in trials, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and convenience of use in older individuals, with space for additions. Forty-three European professionals with an interest in medication for older individuals were included. In order to investigate their relevance, five items were included in a second questionnaire, with 11 control items. Median scores, differences between clinical and non-clinical respondents and response consistency were analysed. Consistency was present in 10 control items. Therefore, all items of the first questionnaire and the five additional items were analysed. Thirty-seven (86%) respondents returned the first questionnaire; 31/37 (84%) the second. Information about age-related differences in adverse events, locomotor effects, drug-disease interactions, dosing instructions, and information about the proportion of included 65+ patients was considered necessary by most respondents. Clinicians considered information significantly more important than the non-clinical respondents about the inclusion of 75+, time-until-benefit in older people, anticholinergic effects, drug-disease interactions, and convenience of use. Main study limitations are the focus on information for daily practice, while the ICH E7 guideline is a legislative document focused on market approval of a new medicine. Also, a questionnaire with a Likert scale has its limitations; this was addressed by providing space for comments. Conclusions: This study reveals that items considered necessary are currently not included in the ICH E7 guideline. Also, clinicians’ and non-clinicians’ opinions differed significantly in 15% of the items. Therefore, all stakeholders should collaborate to improve the availability of information for the rational prescribing to older individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Potentially inappropriate prescribing is a common problem, especially in elderly care. To tackle this problem, Irish medical experts have developed a list of criteria when medication should be added or omitted based upon the patient's physical condition and medication use, known as the STOPP and START criteria. The STOPP and START criteria have been formulated to identify the prescribing of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs). One of the most common problems of inappropriate prescribing is gastro-intestinal track bleedings. For this purpose, nine of the 87 STOPP and START criteria are designed to prevent this. However, the prevalence of gastro-intestinal track bleedings has not been established when these nine STOPP and START criteria are violated. The database contained 182,000 patients belonging to 49 general practitioners in the region of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. We estimated both the incidence of PIMs and PPOs and whether harm, in this case a gastro-intestinal track bleeding, occurred. We found that although violation of the nine STOPP or START criteria were possibly associated with harm (OR = 1.30), this association was not statistically significant (p = 0.323). Searching for evidence for harm informs decision support design aimed at improving quality of medication prescription as it prioritizes the many suggested criteria based on their relevance.