Search

Clonal proliferation in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) is driven by somatic mutations in JAK2, CALR or MPL, but the contribution of inherited factors is poorly characterized. Using a three-stage genome-wide association study of 3,437 MPN cases and 10,083 controls, we identify two SNPs with genome-wide significance in JAK2V617F-negative MPN: rs12339666 (JAK2; meta-analysis P=1.27 × 10−10) and rs2201862 (MECOM; meta-analysis P=1.96 × 10−9). Two additional SNPs, rs2736100 (TERT) and rs9376092 (HBS1L/MYB), achieve genome-wide significance when including JAK2V617F-positive cases. rs9376092 has a stronger effect in JAK2V617F-negative cases with CALR and/or MPL mutations (Breslow–Day P=4.5 × 10−7), whereas in JAK2V617F-positive cases rs9376092 associates with essential thrombocythemia (ET) rather than polycythemia vera (allelic χ2 P=7.3 × 10−7). Reduced MYB expression, previously linked to development of an ET-like disease in model systems, associates with rs9376092 in normal myeloid cells. These findings demonstrate that multiple germline variants predispose to MPN and link constitutional differences in MYB expression to disease phenotype., Somatic mutations drive the clonal proliferation of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Here the authors conduct a genome-wide association study and identify germline variation at multiple loci associated with the development and disease phenotype of these cancers.

We studied the impact of driver mutations of JAK2, CALR, (calreticulin gene) or MPL on clinical course, leukemic transformation, and survival of patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Of the 617 subjects studied, 399 (64.7%) carried JAK2 (V617F), 140 (22.7%) had a CALR exon 9 indel, 25 (4.0%) carried an MPL (W515) mutation, and 53 (8.6%) had nonmutated JAK2, CALR, and MPL (so-called triple-negative PMF). Patients with CALR mutation had a lower risk of developing anemia, thrombocytopenia, and marked leukocytosis compared with other subtypes. They also had a lower risk of thrombosis compared with patients carrying JAK2 (V617F). At the opposite, triple-negative patients had higher incidence of leukemic transformation compared with either CALR-mutant or JAK2-mutant patients. Median overall survival was 17.7 years in CALR-mutant, 9.2 years in JAK2-mutant, 9.1 years in MPL-mutant, and 3.2 years in triple-negative patients. In multivariate analysis corrected for age, CALR-mutant patients had better overall survival than either JAK2-mutant or triple-negative patients. The impact of genetic lesions on survival was independent of current prognostic scoring systems. These observations indicate that driver mutations define distinct disease entities within PMF. Accounting for them is not only relevant to clinical decision-making, but should also be considered in designing clinical trials.

Extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas constitute 20-25% of overall non-Hodgkin's lymphomas cases and can be managed with very different therapeutic strategies. Therefore, the Italian Society of Hematology and the two affiliate societies (the Italian Society of Experimental Hematology and the Italian Group of Bone Marrow Transplantation) appointed a panel of experts to produce clinical practice-guidelines for the management of these conditions. Primary lung and mediastinal lymphomas were the objective of this part of the project. The panel of experts produced the following key recommendations that were graded according to the strength of evidence and clinical judgement. The first-line therapy for non-MALT primary lung non-Hodgkin's lymphomas should include anthracycline-based chemotherapy with CHOP or CHOP-like, MACOP-B or MACOP-B-like regimens (grade D). Rituximab association with chemotherapy needs to be evaluated within approved clinical trials. Second-line therapy with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation is recommended (grade B). In patients with MALT primary lung non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, the recommended first-line therapy should include chlorambucil, CHOP, CHOP-like or fludarabine-containing regimens (grade B). Radiotherapy is to be reserved for patients with a unique, small lesion in a poorly mobile site and with contraindication to surgery (grade D). Rituximab should be administered only within approved clinical trials. For treatment of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphomas, the recommended first-line therapy is a chemotherapy and radiotherapy association (grade B). An anthracycline-based chemotherapy with CHOP, MACOP-B or VACOP-B is recommended (grade B). Rituximab combination with chemotherapy is highly suggested but only for patients enrolled into approved clinical trials. Patients with an inadequate early response should be candidates for early intensification with high-dose chemotherapy (grade C). Patients with refractory or relapsed disease should undergo rescue programs including intensive, non-cross-resistant debulking treatment followed, in chemosensitive patients, by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (grade B).

The Italian Society of Hematology (SIE) and the two affiliated societies (SIES and GITMO) commissioned a project to develop clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of nodal indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). Key questions clinically relevant to the management of patients with nodal indolent NHL were formulated by an Advisory Committee and approved by an Expert Panel composed of eight senior hematologists. After a comprehensive, systematic review of the literature, the Expert Panel formulated therapy recommendations and graded them according to the supporting evidence. An explicit approach to consensus methodologies was used for evidence interpretation and for providing recommendations based on poor evidence. The Expert Panel formulated recommendations on when to start a lymphoma-specific therapy, which first-line therapy to choose and which therapy to adopt for patients with relapsed, refractory and transformed disease. Treatment deferral was recommended for patients with stage III-IV disease without systemic symptoms, high tumor burden, extranodal disease, cytopenia due to marrow involvement, leukemic phase, serous effusion and high lactate dehydrogenase levels. Patients with stage I-II disease and a low tumor burden should receive frontline external involved-field radiotherapy, while patients with a high tumor burden or a severe prognostic score should receive front-line chemotherapy plus involved-field radiotherapy. Younger patients with stage III-IV disease should receive front-line therapy with anthracycline- or fludarabine-based regimens combined with rituximab, while older patients who are candidates for treatment should receive single-agent alkylating therapy. By using a systematic literature review and an explicit approach to consensus among experts, recommendations for the key therapeutic decisions in patients with nodal indolent NHL are provided.

A b s t r ac t Background Current treatment recommendations for patients with polycythemia vera call for maintaining a hematocrit of less than 45%, but this therapeutic strategy has not been tested in a randomized clinical trial. Methods We randomly assigned 365 adults with JAK2-positive polycythemia vera who were being treated with phlebotomy, hydroxyurea, or both to receive either more intensive treatment (target hematocrit

Background: Myeloproliferative neoplasms, including PMF, PET-MF, and PPV-MF, are a group of clonal stem cell-derived diseases characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, and debilitating constitutional symptoms. Ruxolitinib (rux), a potent oral JAK1 & 2 inhibitor, demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly and improved MF-related symptoms and quality of life in 2 phase 3 studies (COMFORT-I and -II). Due to unmet medical need, rux has been made available through an individual patient supply program (IPSP) outside the US. Methods: Patients (pts) with PMF, PPV-MF, or PET-MF requiring treatment (as determined by their physician) and classified as high-, intermediate (int)-2-, or int-1-risk with an enlarged spleen were evaluated for eligibility on an individual basis by the sponsor, irrespective of JAK2 mutation status. The starting dose of rux was determined on the basis of baseline platelet count (15 or 20 mg twice daily for pts with platelet counts of 100-200 x 109/L and > 200 x 109/L, respectively) and can be adjusted for efficacy and safety. Dose changes during treatment, adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs) are registered throughout the program. Results: To date, 1339 requests have been received from > 800 physicians in 48 countries, including locations in Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, and Asia. The baseline characteristics are shown in the Table for pts whose requests for access were approved (n = 1240). Drug resupply requests are received every {approx} 3 months. Follow-up information, based on the first resupply request, was available for 381/639 (60%) of the pts who were enrolled in the program prior to February 2012; 303 (80%) remain on rux therapy, 37 (10%) have discontinued, 11 (3%) died, and 30 (8%) did not initiate therapy. Spleen response was available for 247 pts (decreased, n = 201; unchanged, n = 39; increased, n = 7). Changes in constitutional symptoms were available for 203 pts (decreased, n = 151; unchanged, n = 49; increased, n = 3). In pts enrolled in the IPSP undergoing rux treatment, most pts who had a decrease in spleen length also had a decrease in symptoms. Dose-modification information was available for 259 pts, of whom 44 had dose increases and 89 had dose decreases. Reasons for dose modifications included efficacy (n = 28), safety (n = 69), and other reasons (n = 36). Safety information was available for 266 pts; 75 reported significant AEs or SAEs as determined by investigators. Enrolled pt characteristics are generally similar to those expected in the overall MF pt population. Thus far, the proportion of pts enrolled in the IPSP with the JAK2 V617F mutation (73%) is higher than that for the general MF population (50%-60%). This may reflect a misconception that JAK inhibition is primarily effective in pts who have the JAK2 V617F mutation, when in fact rux has demonstrated similar efficacy in both pt types in the phase 1/2 251 study and the two phase 3 COMFORT trials. This may also be reflected in the higher proportion of PPV-MF pts in the IPSP than in the general MF population (28% vs 10%-15%), of whom 95% are JAK2 V617 F-positive. Conclusions: Considerable requests for access to rux have been received through the IPSP, highlighting the need for an effective treatment in pts with a range of IPSS risk-assessment scores. The demographics of the IPSP pts are similar to those expected in the overall MF population. Responses and safety patterns observed in the IPSP appear to be comparable to those from the COMFORT trials. (Table presented).