Search

This is the main slidedeck used during the COPIM – SciELO 25 Years Seminar "Open Book Futures: Working together to Build Community-owned Infrastructures for OA books" / "Futuros do livro aberto: trabalhando juntos para construir infraestruturas de propriedade da comunidade para livros AA" / "Futuros a Libro Abierto: Trabajando juntos para construir infraestructuras de propiedad comunitaria para libros AA" English: Over the last four years, the COPIM team have been developing open, community-governed infrastructure to support open access book publishing. This includes the Open Book Collective, which supports collective funding for OA books and infrastructures, and the Thoth metadata dissemination system, which enables publishers to easily create high-quality, open metadata to share their OA books as widely as possible. All of this infrastructure is community-owned and governed by its users. With £5.8 million from Arcadia and Research England to develop this infrastructure equitably as part of the ‘Open Book Futures’ project, the COPIM team want to find out how they can collaborate with, and learn from, the members of the SciELO network. How might what COPIM is building be useful to you? What are they currently missing? What are the possibilities for collaboration? Come along to this session, learn more about what COPIM is building, and share your perspective on how OA book publishing can best be nurtured and developed within SciELO and beyond. Espanol: Durante los últimos cuatro años, el equipo de COPIM ha estado desarrollando una infraestructura abierta y gobernada por la comunidad para respaldar la publicación de libros de acceso abierto. Esto incluye el Open Book Collective, que apoya la financiación colectiva de libros e infraestructuras de AA, y el sistema de difusión de metadatos Thoth, que permite a los editores crear fácilmente metadatos abiertos de alta calidad para compartir sus libros de AA de la forma más amplia posible. Toda esta infraestructura es propiedad de la comunidad y está gobernada por sus usuarios. Con £5,8 millones de Arcadia e Research England para desarrollar esta infraestructura de manera equitativa como parte del proyecto ‘Open Book Futures’, el equipo de COPIM quiere saber cómo pueden colaborar y aprender de los miembros de la red SciELO. ¿Cómo les puede ser útil lo que está construyendo COPIM? ¿Qué les falta actualmente? ¿Cuáles son las posibilidades de colaboración? Venga a esta sesión, aprenda más sobre lo que COPIM está construyendo y comparta su perspectiva sobre cómo la publicación de libros de AA puede nutrirse y desarrollarse mejor dentro de SciELO y más allá. Português: Nos últimos quatro anos, a equipe do COPIM desenvolveu uma infraestrutura aberta e governada pela comunidade para dar suporte à publicação de livros de acesso aberto. Isso inclui o Open Book Collective, que apóia o financiamento coletivo para livros e infraestruturas OA, e o sistema de disseminação de metadados Thoth, que permite que os editores criem facilmente metadados abertos de alta qualidade para compartilhar seus livros OA o mais amplamente possível. Toda essa infraestrutura é de propriedade da comunidade e governada por seus usuários. Com £ 5,8 milhões da Arcadia e da Research England para desenvolver essa infraestrutura de forma equitativa como parte do projeto ‘Open Book Futures’, a equipe do COPIM quer descobrir como pode colaborar e aprender com os membros da Rede SciELO. Como o que o COPIM está construindo pode ser útil para você? O que está faltando atualmente? Quais são as possibilidades de colaboração? Participe desta sessão, saiba mais sobre o que o COPIM está construindo e compartilhe sua perspectiva sobre como a publicação de livros OA pode ser mais bem nutrida e desenvolvida dentro do SciELO e além., Open Book Futures is supported by the Research England Development (RED) Fund, and Arcadia.

This presentation was given during thePALOMERA Series launch event with Niels Stern (OAPEN/DOAB) and Ursula Rabar (OPERAS/OAeBU), hosted by Lucy Barnes (OABN/PALOMERA). This event explores the PALOMERA project and how the community canengage with its work via the OABN. Find out more about the OABN PALOMERA Series: https://openaccessbooksnetwork.hcommons.org/2023/03/02/the-oabn-is-working-with-palomera/. You can watch the recording of this event on the OABN YouTube channel:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnM91NFs8QU. PALOMERA is funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

The Dissemination, outreach, engagement, and exploitation plan (PEDR) describes the methodology across the PALOMERA project as a guideline for the activities of all project partners when sharing information about the project, engaging with the community, reaching out to it as well as the activities to be carried out to enhance the successful exploitation of the project results. The guide identifies the strategy for dissemination, outreach, engagement, and exploitation, and describes the various channels that the project uses. It is complemented by the Communications Kit developed separately that provides an overview of items available to all project partners for download. The PEDR is a living document. Its structure mainly follows the template suggested in the PALOMERA Grant Agreement (proposal part). It will be updated during the project implementation and tailored to the project’s needs and progress on demand. The current document is a first draft of the PEDR and will be updated at the end of each reporting period (M9, M24). Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. &nbsp

Presentation as part of a COPIM webinar hosted by the National Acquisitions Group In early 2022 the major research funding body in the UK (UKRI), released a policy statement mandating OA monographs, with an implementation date of January 1st, 2024. This date will see a shift from a hypothetical future for OA books to a concrete policy with a hard deadline. Add to this the forthcoming mandates on OA books from cOAlition S/Plan S in Europe, plus potential implications of the next REF in the UK, and it is clear that there is a pressing need for libraries and academic book publishers to understand how the sector will meet the challenges of implementing these policies. In this session, the speakers outline the current state-of-play and discuss how we can move to meet these imminent OA mandates. With a mix of presentation(s) and Q&A, the audience is invited to discuss what the transition to open access for scholarly books will look like, and to question the challenges and opportunities. Who is at risk of being excluded, on the library and the publishing sides? How do we get from where publishing and libraries are today, to making these policies a workable reality in 2024? And how will all of this be paid for? Speakers will demonstrate how Book Processing Charges (BPCs) worsen inequality by favouring the most wealthy institutions and authors and will then highlight some collective library models that seek to spread the funding of OA books so that no single institution bears a disproportionate cost. Programmes in use today range from the large and well-funded publishers like MIT and their Direct 2 Open, to much smaller publishers like OBP and punctum books. Highlight the COPIM project’s Opening the Future model and the Open Book Collective. With the clock ticking on policies, conversation is urgently needed on the practicalities of making mandates reality. What can libraries do to meet the challenge, and how might supporting programmes like those launched by COPIM ensure that the transition to OA is a sustainable and bibliodiverse one? The transition to OA should not leave smaller and medium-sized presses behind; nor should it rely on paying BPCs, which risks excluding any author without funding. And the transition must also be sustainable for libraries., Community-led Open Publishing Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM) is supported by the Research England Development (RED) Fund, and Arcadia—a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin.

This talk will outline the support systems that we see as vital for a flourishing OA books ecology as well as examining the challenges that are involved in both building and fostering engagement with such systems. In doing so, we will draw throughout on our experiences as part of the COPIM (Community-led Publication Infrastructures for Monographs) project, a partnership of researchers, librarians, publishers, and infrastructure providers that is in the process of building open and community-led infrastructures to support the funding, creation, dissemination, and preservation of long-form academic content. Books are only recently becoming prominent in conversations (and policies) about Open Access. The relative immaturity of the OA books landscape creates both opportunities and challenges: opportunities, in that much remains unsettled and there is the potential for motivated groups to have significant influence on the future funding, creation, sharing, and preservation of OA books; and challenges in building the infrastructures and creating the support networks among researchers, publishers, and librarians that will be required to make a successful transition to OA. Our talk will address three major challenges that we and our colleagues are grappling with: how to foster researcher engagement with, and enthusiasm for, OA books, in an environment when change is often driven by policy mandates and authors see very mixed levels of publisher support for OA; how to make it easier for institutions to offer forms of support to OA books focused initiatives in the face of scepticism from some colleagues and increasing degrees financial constraint; and how to build infrastructures to strengthen and improve the funding and dissemination of OA books, in the face of an increasing diversity of OA initiatives looking for support and a landscape dominated by infrastructures designed to promote the circulation of non-OA content., Community-led Open Publishing Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM) is supported by the Research England Development (RED) Fund, and Arcadia���a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin.

Open access (OA) book publishing is undergoing a period of transition. While scholar-led presses have long been at the forefront of OA book publishing, developing innovative business models and publication workflows and advocating for a broader shift to OA, larger commercial and university presses are now beginning to take OA books seriously. Community-led approaches such as the ScholarLed consortium and the Radical Open Access Collective may be threatened by the emergent trend towards 'big deals' and 'transformative' agreements in the OA book world, through which institutions and authors are encouraged to support only the ���big players��� with money or manuscripts, potentially leaving smaller and academic-led presses out in the cold. The ���scaling small��� approach (see Adema & Moore, 2021) offers one alternative to this monopolistic vision, focusing on collaboration between smaller, academic-led and non-profit entities to build systems and infrastructures that provide mutual support at multiple scales. This ���scaling small��� philosophy is being put powerfully to work by the Community-led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM) project, a major three-year international project bringing together libraries, scholar-led OA publishers, researchers, and infrastructure providers to build open, non-profit, community-governed infrastructures to expand the publication of OA books. COPIM, which includes members of both ScholarLed and the Radical Open Access Collective, is developing platforms and partnerships to address key technological, structural, and organisational hurdles around the funding, production, dissemination, discovery, reuse, and archiving of OA books. The project thus aims to build the structures that can sustain a diverse, scholar-led, not-for-profit OA publishing ecosystem according to the principle of ���scaling small���. We are approaching the halfway point of our project and this paper will share insights into our progress so far, together with our plans for the next phase of our work, outlining how COPIM is putting ���scaling small��� into action. This includes: a non-profit, community-governed platform to facilitate the exchange of information and funding between libraries, OA book publishers, researchers and the wider public; Opening the Future, a business model enabling the transition of legacy publishers to a non-BPC (book processing charge) OA business model; the study and development of appropriate and robust governance models for non-profit, community-owned infrastructures; Thoth, an open-source OA book metadata creation and dissemination system and service; a report, toolset and use cases exploring the field of experimental book publishing practices, including a review of open-source tools and platforms; technical and legal solutions to effectively archive and preserve complex digital research publications. This paper will lay out these developments and the philosophy of the project as a whole, giving attendees at OAI 2021 valuable insight into a major new initiative supporting scholar-led OA for books. As Adema and Moore (2021) argue (building on the work of Anna Tsing): ���scaling small��� can ���be perceived ���as a way to reconceptualize the world ��� and perhaps rebuild it������., Community-led Open Publishing Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM) is supported by the Research England Development (RED) Fund, and Arcadia���a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin.

As the theme of this conference attests, the COVID-19 pandemic has called on librarians to adapt their services in many ways. One pinch point has been the provision of book content, with digital editions often unavailable or unaffordable, as highlighted by high-profile statements and campaigns in the United Kingdom, the Republic of Ireland and Canada. One solution is to expand the availability of Open Access (OA) books -- an objective that has value far beyond the current global crisis, but is hampered by issues related to funding, discoverability, and more. Community-led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM) is a major three-year international project bringing together libraries, OA book publishers, researchers, and infrastructure providers to build open, community-governed infrastructure that will expand the publication of OA books. With over £3.5 million in funding from Research England and Arcadia, COPIM is developing systems, platforms and partnerships to support the funding, discoverability and development of non-profit, community-focused Open Access book publishing. Rather than imposing heavy fees on institutional budgets in the form of Book Processing Charges (BPCs) or forcing libraries to adopt particular platforms to access content, COPIM has been working in partnership with libraries to nurture a diverse, scholar-led, not-for-profit OA publishing ecosystem. We are now at the halfway point of our project, and this paper will share what we have built so far, together with our plans for the next phase of our work. This includes: A non-profit, community-governed platform to enable libraries to assess, evaluate and select OA presses and consortia for financial support. After a year of research, including extensive workshops with librarians in the UK, the US and Europe to determine how this platform could be most useful to libraries, this is now entering its development phase. An open-source metadata system, called Thoth, which is now in its pilot stage with two presses. Following the publication of a major report into the dissemination and discovery of Open Access books, this system is being developed for maximum interoperability, to be able to cope with (and convert) different types of metadata. The metadata is to be openly licensed, so that rather than librarians having to ingest poor-quality OA book metadata from third-party providers, or else deal with publishers individually, it will be a single resource of high-quality OA book metadata from many OA presses. A business model, called Opening the Future, to enable presses to convert to OA book publishing without charging BPCs. This model, developed after the publication of a major report into OA book revenue models, enables libraries to subscribe to a closed-access backlist, the proceeds from which fund an OA frontlist. This model is up and running with Central European University Press, with more presses in discussion about adopting it. This presentation will lay out these developments and the philosophy of the project as a whole, giving librarians at LIBER 2021 valuable insight into a major new initiative supporting Open Access for books., Community-led Open Publishing Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM) is supported by the Research England Development (RED) Fund, and Arcadia—a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin.

What is the nature of the experience of risk? Risk can impose distinctive burdens on individuals: making us anxious, impairing our relationships, and limiting our ability to plan our lives. On the other hand, risky situations are sometimes exciting, liberating, and even empowering. The article explores the idea that risk can result in benefits for the individuals who bear it. Specifically, we evaluate John Tomasi’s claim that the experience of economic risk is a precondition of individual self-respect. Philosophical claims about the social bases of self-respect such as Tomasi’s have not been subjected to sufficient empirical scrutiny. The article exemplifies an alternative approach, by integrating philosophical argument with the analysis of large-scale survey data. Whilst Tomasi’s claim has force in some contexts, evidence from the economic domain shows that risk tends to undermine rather than to support self-respect.

Families are phenomenological and unique. All families are valuable, but historically, many family types have been underrepresented. Families with members who identify in the BIPOC LGBTQIA+ communities have historically been underrepresented and marginalized. Helping BIPOC LGBTQIA+ families involves both clinical work and advocacy. Advocacy for the professional identity of counseling, marriage and family therapy, and related helpers involves various aspects. These aspects include leadership theory and integration, importance of professional identity, the need to continue to infuse multiculturalism within the counseling and family therapy identities, and continued skills for counselors to learn inclusive advocacy. Skills and implications for advocacy as they relate to clients who intersect among the LGBTQAI+ and BIPOC communities, will be described.

According to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2014), approximately 50,821 adolescents are held in residential placement facilities on any given day in the United States. Data suggests that about 20% of these adolescents suffer from mental health issues (Shelton, et al., 2011). This paper reviewed studies of three different group work-based treatment interventions: mindfulness, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and dialectical-behavioral therapy. The analysis will examine whether these interventions can effectively reduce maladaptive cognitions and decrease self-destructive behaviors, and whether they can be applied to adolescents aged 12-19 in correctional settings., Columbia Social Work Review, Vol 15 No 1 (2017)

According to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2014), approximately 50,821 adolescents are held in residential placement facilities on any given day in the United States. Data suggests that about 20% of these adolescents suffer from mental health issues (Shelton, et al., 2011). This paper reviewed studies of three different group work-based treatment interventions: mindfulness, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and dialectical-behavioral therapy. The analysis will examine whether these interventions can effectively reduce maladaptive cognitions and decrease self-destructive behaviors, and whether they can be applied to adolescents aged 12-19 in correctional settings. Five studies met inclusion criteria; however, due to limitations including small sample sizes, a lack of follow up, a variety of behaviors being measured, and a range of different types of skills groups, several were excluded. For the purposes of this review, the term “residential setting” will refer to correctional settings, inpatient psychiatric settings, and residential settings, and the terms “youth,” “juveniles,” and “adolescents,” will be used interchangeably.

Title: Does high fidelity simulation training in ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia make it too difficult for novices?Author(s):Barnes L., Willers J., Goosen L., Rose H., Birk B., Hariharan S.Institute(s):Worthing Hospital, Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Dept of Anaesthesiology & Intensive Care, Worthing, United KingdomText:Background and Goal of Study: Advances in materials have made it possible to construct high fidelity simulation phantoms for ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia (USGRA). It was not known what detrimental effect greater realism and resultant increased difficulty might have on teaching these skills. We assessed this at an USGRA course using both advanced phantoms and commercial ones (Fig 1) and found this not to be the case. Users, classing themselves as experienced (n=5) or learners (n=9), responded positively (Likert scale responses >80%) . Two novices that attended gave more neutral responses ( < 80% but > 60%). It was unclear whether this was due to the level of difficulty, small sample number or unwillingness to give opinions due to inexperience (nearly 50% responses neither agree/ disagree).1 We therefore decided to test the hypothesis that increased difficulty associated with complex high fidelity USGRA phantoms could be counterproductive, and be detrimental to the learning process for novices.Material and methods: We recruited an additional 9 novices to perform the same evaluation following exposure to an identical USGRA training process. Results were analysed in a similar manner.Results and discussion: The feedback from the larger sample novices group (9) was the same in all aspects as that of the 9 (more experienced) learners (average >80%). A minority of respondents at both levels of experience felt that more realistic models were distracting and preferred basic ones, with little difference between learners and novices. This could be indicative of individual preference for a modular method of skill training instead of a holistic approach.Conclusion: There do not seem to be a negative effect caused by increased realism and difficulty associated with using complex high fidelity phantoms for training USGRA training in novices, thus disproving the hypothesis.References: 1. Barnes L, Willers J, Rose, H, Birk, B, Goosen, L, Oosthuysen, S. Haptic realism in phantoms. A dream come true or a nightmare for learners in Ultrasound Guided Regional Anaesthesia? Anaesthesia 2015 70; 4: 29Ethical Research Declaration: SurveyPreferred Presentation Type: Clinical or experimental study