Search

Background: Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PFF) is of substantial interest for novel pharmacotherapy discovery, but little is known about clinical trial eligibility criteria. We evaluated eligibility criteria of PPF randomized controlled trials (RCTs), their representativeness in registry patients, and forced vital capacity (FVC) changes and mortality according to trial eligibility., Methods: A systematic search was used to identify completed and in-progress phase II and III PPF RCTs. Common clinical trial eligibility criteria used in ≥60% of previous PPF RCTs were identified. The most common criteria for PPF used in RCTs ("trial-PPF criteria") and the clinical practice guideline definition of PPF ("guideline-PPF criteria") were both applied to patients enrolled in a prospective multicenter Canadian registry. Common trial eligibility criteria were tested for their frequency and association with health outcomes in registry patients who met trial-PPF and guideline-PPF criteria., Results: Ten different definitions of PPF were used in 16 RCTs. At the time of meeting PPF definitions, 50% of 864 patients with trial-PPF and 44% of 408 patients with guideline-PPF met the common trial eligibility criteria. For both definitions, trial-eligible patients had more rapid 1-year FVC decline but better transplant-free survival than trial-ineligible patients. Patients with unclassifiable interstitial lung disease (ILD) had higher proportion of trial exclusion compared to those with connective tissue disease-associated ILD and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Annual FVC decline (trial-PPF: -67 to -21 mL; guideline-PPF: -116 to -41 mL) and 1-year transplant-free survival (trial-PPF: 90.5 to 97.5%; guideline-PPF: 87 to 96.2%) varied in trial-eligible patients across ILD subtypes., Conclusions: Existing RCTs use a variety of definitions for PPF with eligibility criteria that have limited representativeness. FVC decline and transplant-free survival vary according to trial eligibility and ILD subtypes., (Copyright ©The authors 2024. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Respiratory diseases exhibit diverse patterns in prevalence, clinical presentations, and outcomes between men and women. Historically, certain conditions were more prevalent in men, but trends have shifted, highlighting the need to understand sex disparities in respiratory health. Social, environmental, and healthcare changes have reshaped the landscape of respiratory diseases, complicating diagnosis and treatment. Moreover, the underrepresentation of women in clinical trials has limited our understanding of their specific needs. In this review, we explore the sex differences in the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and presentation of respiratory diseases, emphasizing the importance of tailored approaches to diagnosis and management. By recognizing and addressing these disparities, we can advance toward more equitable and effective respiratory healthcare for all individuals., (Copyright © 2024 SEPAR. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Cough is a key symptom in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). Objectives: This study evaluated the prevalence, longitudinal change, associations, and prognostic significance of cough severity in patients with fibrotic ILD. Methods: We included consecutive patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF fibrotic ILD who completed the 100-mm Cough Severity Visual Analog Scale from the prospective multicenter Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Baseline cough severity and associations with patient demographics and clinical factors were determined. Relationships between baseline cough severity and health outcomes were evaluated. Measurements and Main Results: Patients with IPF ( n  = 1,061) had higher median baseline cough severity than those with non-IPF fibrotic ILD ( n  = 2,825) (24 vs. 20 mm; P  < 0.001), with worse cough associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease for both cohorts. Worse cough severity was independently associated with worse health-related quality of life at baseline, larger annualized decline in Dl CO , development of disease progression, and reduced transplant-free survival in both IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD cohorts. The IPF cohort (2.2 mm; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.9 mm) had larger annualized increments in cough severity than the non-IPF fibrotic ILD cohort (1.1 mm; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.4 mm; P  = 0.004). There was no difference in worsening cough over time comparing those receiving and not receiving ILD-targeted therapy or with and without lung function decline. Conclusions: Cough is common in patients with IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD, with increasing cough severity over time irrespective of ILD-targeted therapy. Patient-reported cough severity has prognostic implications on health-related quality of life, disease progression, and survival in fibrotic ILD.

Rationale: A visual analog scale (VAS) is a simple and easily administered tool for measuring the impact of disease; however, little is known about the use of a dyspnea VAS in interstitial lung disease (ILD). Objectives: To validate the use of a dyspnea VAS in a large and heterogeneous cohort of patients with fibrotic ILD, including its minimal clinically important difference (MCID), responsiveness to change, and prognostic significance. Methods: Patients with fibrotic ILD were identified from a large prospective registry. The validity of a 100-mm dyspnea VAS was assessed by testing its correlation in change score with other measures of ILD severity, including the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease quality of life questionnaire Breathlessness and Activities Domain, the European Quality of Life VAS, forced vital capacity, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide. The responsiveness of the dyspnea VAS was qualitatively confirmed on the basis of there being an observable difference in the change in dyspnea VAS across tertiles of change in anchor variables. The MCID in dyspnea VAS was calculated using both anchor (linear regression) and distribution (one-half standard deviation) approaches, with anchors including the above variables that had a correlation with dyspnea VAS (| r | ≥ 0.30). The association of dyspnea VAS with time to death or transplant was determined. Results: The cohort included 826 patients with fibrotic ILD, including 127 patients with follow-up measurements at 6 months. The mean baseline dyspnea VAS was 53 ± 24 mm. Dyspnea VAS change scores were moderately correlated with the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (| r | = 0.55) and the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease quality of life questionnaire Breathlessness and Activities Domain (| r | = 0.44) and weakly correlated with the European Quality of Life VAS (| r | = 0.19), forced vital capacity percent predicted (| r | = 0.21), and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide percent predicted (| r | = 0.05). The MCID was 2.7 to 4.5 using the more reliable anchor-based methods and 12.0 based on distribution-based methods. Dyspnea VAS was associated with time to death or transplant in unadjusted models and after adjustment for age and sex (hazard ratios, 1.16 and 1.15, respectively; P  < 0.05 for both). Conclusions: This study provides support for the use of the dyspnea VAS in patients with fibrotic ILD, with an estimated anchor-based MCID of 5 mm.

Background and Objective: Establishing an accurate and timely diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is essential for appropriate management and prognostication. In some cases, surgical lung biopsy (SLB) is performed but carries non-negligible risk. The objective of this retrospective study was to determine if SLB is associated with accelerated lung function decline in patients with IPF using the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis., Methods: Linear mixed models and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare decline in forced vital capacity (FVC)%, diffusion capacity of the lung (DLCO%) and risk of death or lung transplantation between SLB and non-SLB patients. Adjustments were made for baseline age, sex, smoking history, antifibrotic use, and lung function. A similar analysis compared lung function changes 12 months pre- and post-SLB., Results: A total of 81 SLB patients and 468 non-SLB patients were included. In the SLB group, the post-biopsy annual FVC% decline was 2.0% (±0.8) in unadjusted, and 2.1% (±0.8) in adjusted models. There was no difference in FVC% decline, DLCO% decline, or time to death or lung transplantation between the two groups, in adjusted or unadjusted models (all p-values >0.07). In the pre-post SLB group, no differences were identified in FVC% decline in unadjusted or adjusted models (p = 0.07 for both)., Conclusion: No association between SLB and lung function decline or risk of death or lung transplantation was identified in this multi-centre study of patients with IPF., (© 2024 The Authors. Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Background: Patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) are frequently treated with immunosuppression to slow lung function decline; however, the impact of this treatment has not been studied across different types of antigen exposure., Research Question: In patients with fHP, do disease outcomes and response to treatment vary by antigen type?, Study Design and Methods: A multicenter interstitial lung disease database (Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis) was used to identify patients with fHP. The causative antigen was categorized as avian, mold, unknown, or other. Treatment was defined as mycophenolate ≥ 1,000 mg/d or azathioprine ≥ 75 mg/d for ≥ 30 days. Statistical analysis included t tests, χ 2 tests, and one-way analysis of variance. Unadjusted and adjusted competing risks and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess survival., Results: A total of 344 patients were identified with the following causative antigens: avian (n = 93; 27%), mold (n = 88; 26%), other (n = 15; 4%), and unknown (n = 148; 43%). Patient characteristics and lung function were similar among antigen groups with a mean FVC % predicted of 75 ± 20. The percent of patients treated with immunosuppression was similar between antigens with 58% of patients treated. There was no change in lung function or symptom scores with the initiation of immunosuppression in the full cohort. Immunosuppression was not associated with a change in survival for patients with avian or mold antigen (avian: hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.11-1.59; P = .20; mold: hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.26-4.97; P = .88). For patients with unknown causative antigen, survival was worse when treated with immunosuppression (hazard ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.01-6.92; P = .047)., Interpretation: Response to immunosuppression varies by antigen type in patients with fHP. Additional studies are needed to test the role of immunosuppression in fHP, and particularly in those with an unknown antigen., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: A. W. W. reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Astra Zeneca, outside the submitted work. V. M. reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada, Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, and Astra Zeneca; and reports grants from the University of Saskatchewan, Royal University Hospital Foundation, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca, and Hoffman-La Roche. D.-C. M. reports consultancy and speaking fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. B. Z. reports speaking fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Abbvie. D. A. is supported by the Fonds de Recherche du Quebec en Santé, reports personal fees and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, reports personal fees from Hoffmann-La Roche, and reports grants from the Canadian Institute for Health Research. K. A. J. reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pulmonary Fibrosis Society of Calgary, and University of Calgary School of Medicine; and reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Three Lakes Foundation, Pliant Therapeutics, Theravance, and Blade Therapeutics. M. K. reports grants from the Canadian Institute for Health Research, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pieris, and Prometic; and reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, European Respiratory Journal, Belerophon, United Therapeutics, Nitto Denko, MitoImmune, Pieris, Abbvie, DevPro Biopharma, Horizon, Algernon, and CSL Behring. H. M. reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Gilead. J. M. reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. C. J. R. reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; and reports personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Pliant Therapeutics, Cipla, and Veracyte. None declared (M. L. M., G. F., J. H. F., N. K., B. M., E. F.)., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is frequently associated with abnormal oxygenation; however, little is known about the accuracy of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO 2 ) compared with arterial blood gas (ABG) saturation (SaO 2 ), the factors that influence the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO 2 ) and the impact of PaCO 2 on outcomes in patients with fibrotic ILD., Study Design and Methods: Patients with fibrotic ILD enrolled in a large prospective registry with a room air ABG were included. Prespecified analyses included testing the correlation between SaO 2 and SpO 2 , the difference between SaO 2 and SpO 2 , the association of baseline characteristics with both the difference between SaO 2 and SpO 2 and the PaCO 2 , the association of baseline characteristics with acid-base category, and the association of PaCO 2 and acid-base category with time to death or transplant., Results: A total of 532 patients with fibrotic ILD were included. Mean resting SaO 2 was 92±4% and SpO 2 was 95±3%. Mean PaCO 2 was 38±6 mmHg, with 135 patients having PaCO 2 <35 mmHg and 62 having PaCO 2 >45 mmHg. Correlation between SaO 2 and SpO 2 was mild to moderate (r=0.39), with SpO 2 on average 3.0% higher than SaO 2 . No baseline characteristics were associated with the difference in SaO 2 and SpO 2 . Variables associated with either elevated or abnormal (elevated or low) PaCO 2 included higher smoking pack-years and lower baseline forced vital capacity (FVC). Lower baseline lung function was associated with an increased risk of chronic respiratory acidosis. PaCO 2 and acid-base status were not associated with time to death or transplant., Interpretation: SaO 2 and SpO 2 are weakly-to-moderately correlated in fibrotic ILD, with limited ability to accurately predict this difference. Abnormal PaCO 2 was associated with baseline FVC but was not associated with outcomes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MAD reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. KD reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. DA reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants from Canadian Institute for Health Research and from Fonds de Recherche du Quebec en Santé. CD reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. JHF reports personal fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. KJ reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pulmonary Fibrosis Society of Calgary, University of Calgary School of Medicine; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Three Lakes Foundation, Pliant Therapeutics, Theravance, Blade Therapeutics. MK reports grants from Canadian Institute for Health Research, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pieris, Prometic; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, European Respiratory Journal, Belerophon, United Therapeutics, Nitto Denko, MitoImmune, Pieris, AbbVie, DevPro Biopharma, Horizon, Algernon, CSL Behring. SDL reports consulting/personal fees and moderator honoraria from Boehringer-Ingelheim, honoraria from Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, grants from AstraZeneca and the University of Saskatchewan. HM reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Gilead. VM reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Roche; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. BM reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. JM reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. D-CM reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. CJR reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Pliant Therapeutics, Cipla, Veracyte., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) has features of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), but without meeting criteria for a specific CTD. We compared baseline characteristics, survival, and response to treatment of IPAF to both CTD-ILD and unclassifiable ILD., Methods: Measurements were extracted from a prospective registry. Baseline features and survival were compared in IPAF against both CTD-ILD and unclassifiable ILD. Linear trajectory of lung function decline (%-predicted forced vital capacity [FVC%] and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [DLCO%]) before and after initiation of mycophenolate or azathioprine were compared in IPAF against both CTD-ILD and unclassifiable ILD using linear mixed models., Results: Compared to CTD-ILD (n = 1240), patients with IPAF (n = 128) were older, more frequently male, and had greater smoking history. Compared to unclassifiable ILD (n = 665), patients with IPAF were younger, more frequently female, and had worse baseline lung function. IPAF had higher mortality compared to CTD-ILD and similar risk of mortality compared to unclassifiable ILD. Mycophenolate initiation was associated with stabilization of FVC% and DLCO% in all ILD subtypes except for FVC% in patients with IPAF, and azathioprine initiation with stabilization of FVC% and DLCO% in all ILD subtypes except for FVC% decline in IPAF and DLCO% decline in CTD-ILD., Conclusion: Patients with IPAF had worse survival compared to those with CTD-ILD and similar mortality to unclassifiable ILD, with treatment being associated with stabilization in lung function in all three ILDs. It is uncertain whether IPAF should be considered a distinct ILD diagnostic subgroup., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest CJR, NK, KAJ, DA, HM, JF, MK, NH, SV report personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: SV reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: JA reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: BZ reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: K. Donohoe reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: N. Hambly reports grants from Roche and Janssen; personal fees from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK and Janssen. Conflict of interest: K.A. Johannson reports grants from Three Lakes and University Hospital Foundation. K.J. reports consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Pliant Therapeutics, Three Lakes, Thyron and Brainomix. Conflict of interest: D. Assayag reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: J. Fisher reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: V. Marcoux reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada and Hoffman-La Roche Ltd and Astra Zeneca, grants from the University of Saskatchewan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca and Hoffman-La Roche. VM reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada and Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. Conflict of interest: H. Manganas reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada, Hoffmann La Roche, Galapagos, BMS. Conflict of interest: N. Khalil reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: M. Kolb reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Horizon, Cipla Abbvie, Bellerophon, Algernon, CSL Behring, United Therapeutics, LabCorp, Structure Therapeutics and Astra Zeneca. M. Kolb reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, United Therapeutics and Structure Therapeutics. M. Kolb reports payment for expert testimony from Roche. Conflict of interest: C.J. Ryerson reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Trevi Therapeutics, Pliant Therapeutics, Astrazeneca and Veracyte., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Hypoxemia in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) indicates disease progression and is of prognostic significance. The onset of hypoxemia signifies disease progression and predicts mortality in fibrotic ILD. Accurately predicting new-onset exertional and resting hypoxemia prompts appropriate patient discussion and timely consideration of home oxygen. Objectives: We derived and externally validated a risk prediction tool for both new-onset exertional and new-onset resting hypoxemia. Methods: This study used ILD registries from Canada for the derivation cohort and from Australia and the United States for the validation cohort. New-onset exertional and resting hypoxemia were defined as nadir oxyhemoglobin saturation < 88% during 6-minute-walk tests, resting oxyhemoglobin saturation < 88%, or the initiation of ambulatory or continuous oxygen. Candidate predictors included patient demographics, ILD subtypes, and pulmonary function. Time-varying Cox regression was used to identify the top-performing prediction model according to Akaike information criterion and clinical usability. Model performance was assessed using Harrell's C-index and goodness-of-fit (GoF) likelihood ratio test. A categorized risk prediction tool was developed. Results: The best-performing prediction model for both new-onset exertional and new-onset resting hypoxemia included age, body mass index, a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and percent predicted forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide. The risk prediction tool exhibited good performance for exertional hypoxemia (C-index, 0.70; GoF, P  = 0.85) and resting hypoxemia (C-index, 0.77; GoF, P  = 0.27) in the derivation cohort, with similar performance in the validation cohort except calibration for resting hypoxemia (GoF, P  = 0.001). Conclusions: This clinically applicable risk prediction tool predicted new-onset exertional and resting hypoxemia at 6 months in the derivation cohort and a diverse validation cohort. Suboptimal GoF in the validation cohort likely reflected overestimation of hypoxemia risk and indicated that the model is not flawed because of underestimation of hypoxemia.

Rationale: Transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) has shown promising results, but prospective studies with matched surgical lung biopsy (SLB) have yielded conflicting results. Objectives: We aimed to assess within- and between-center diagnostic agreement between TBCB and SLB at both the histopathologic and multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) levels in patients with diffuse ILD. Methods: In a multicenter prospective study, we performed matched TBCB and SLB in patients referred for SLB. After a blinded review by three pulmonary pathologists, all cases were reviewed by three independent ILD teams in an MDD. MDD was performed first with TBCB, then with SLB in a second session. Within-center and between-center diagnostic agreement was evaluated using percentages and correlation coefficients. Measurements and Main Results: Twenty patients were recruited and underwent contemporaneous TBCB and SLB. Within-center diagnostic agreement between TBCB-MDD and SLB-MDD was reached in 37 of the 60 (61.7%) paired observations, resulting in a Cohen's κ value of 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.63). Diagnostic agreement increased among high-confidence or definitive diagnoses on TBCB-MDD (21 of 29 [72.4%]), but not significantly, and was more likely among cases with SLB-MDD diagnoses of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis than fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (13 of 16 [81.2%] vs. 16 of 31 [51.6%]; P  = 0.047). Between-center agreement for cases was markedly higher for SLB-MDD (κ = 0.71 [95% CI, 0.52-0.89]) than TBCB-MDD (κ = 0.29 [95% CI, 0.09-0.49]). Conclusions: This study demonstrated moderate TBCB-MDD and SLB-MDD diagnostic agreement for ILD, while between-center agreement was fair for TBCB-MDD and substantial for SLB-MDD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02235779).

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is challenging to manage, with a paucity of robust data to guide treatment. Our aim was to characterize the pharmacologic treatment of RA-ILD utilizing a retrospective design in a national multi-center prospective cohort, and to identify associations between treatment and change in lung function and survival., Methods: Patients with RA-ILD and a radiological pattern of non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) or usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) were included. Unadjusted and adjusted linear mixed models and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare lung function change and risk of death or lung transplant by radiologic patterns and treatment., Results: Of 161 patients with RA-ILD, UIP pattern was more common than NSIP (55.9% vs. 44.1%). Only 44/161 (27%) patients were treated over median follow-up of 4 years with medication choice appearing unrelated to patient-specific variables. Decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) was not associated with treatment. Patients with NSIP had lower risk of death or transplant, compared to UIP (P=0.0042). In patients with NSIP, there was no difference in time to death or transplant comparing treated to untreated in adjusted models [hazard ratio (HR) =0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15-3.62; P=0.70]. Similarly, in patients with UIP, there was no difference in time to death or lung transplant between treated and untreated in adjusted models (HR =1.06; 95% CI: 0.49-2.28; P=0.89)., Conclusions: Treatment of RA-ILD is heterogeneous, with most patients in this cohort not receiving treatment. Patients with UIP had worse outcomes compared to NSIP, similar to other cohorts. Randomized clinical trials are needed to inform pharmacologic therapy in this patient population., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-22-1820/coif). All authors report that Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis is sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim Canada but it has had no influence on this study design/manuscript. VM reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada and Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., and Astra Zeneca, grants from the University of Saskatchewan, Royal University Hospital Foundation, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca and Hoffman-La Roche. SL reports consulting fees and moderator honoraria from Boehringer-Ingelheim and a grant from the University of Saskatchewan. SL has served on prior advisory boards of Boehringer-Ingelheim. DA reports consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim and Hoffman-La Roche, payments for a lecture from Boehringer-Ingelheim, and research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim. JHF reports grants from the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation and the University of Toronto, and personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. JHF serves as an unpaid medical advisory board member of Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation. SS reports advisory board participation and personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Hoffman-La Roche, and AstraZeneca. JM reports personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim and Hoffman-La Roche. HM reports research grants from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Galapagos, BMS and Hoffman-La Roche, personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, and participates on an advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim. CDF reports educational grants and research grants from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche and the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation; personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim; Chair of the Board for the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation. NH reports research grants from Boehringer-Ingelheim and Janssen, and personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen, and Hoffman-La Roche. MK serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Journal of Thoracic Disease. MK reports grants from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Hoffman-La Roche and Pieris, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Hoffman-La Roche, Horizon, Cipla, Abbvie, Bellerophon, Algernon, CSL Behring, United Therapeutics Novartis and LabCorp, participation on the advisory board of United Therapeutics Novartis and LabCorp, and allowance for serving as Chief Editor of the European Respiratory Journal. MS reports honoraria for attending symposia from Boehringer-Ingelheim. AWW reports speaker’s honoraria from Boehringer-Ingelheim and AstraZeneca. PGW reports payment for presentation from Vertex. PGW is a member of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Drug Safety Monitoring Board. CJR reports personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Hoffman-La Roche, Veracyte, AstraZeneca, Pliant Therapeutics, Cipla Ltd., and Ensho Health. KAJ reports grants from University Hospital Foundation, Three Lakes Foundation and University oof Calgary CSM, and personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Hoffman-La Roche, Pliant Therapeutics and Three Lakes Foundation. KAJ is a member of the board for PFOX Trial. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Background: Little is known about generalisability of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We evaluated eligibility criteria for phase III IPF RCTs to determine their representativeness in clinical registries, and calculated forced vital capacity (FVC) changes according to eligibility criteria., Methods: Common eligibility criteria used in >60% of IPF RCTs were identified from a literature search and applied to patients with IPF from prospective Australian and Canadian registries. Additional pre-specified criteria of 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and different measures of preceding disease progression were also evaluated. Joint longitudinal-survival modelling was used to compare FVC decline according to eligibility for individual and composite criteria., Results: Out of 990 patients with IPF, 527 (53%) met all common RCT eligibility criteria at the first clinic visit, including 343 with definite IPF and 184 with radiological probable usual interstitial pneumonia pattern without histological confirmation ( i.e. provisional IPF). The percentages of eligible patients for landmark RCTs of nintedanib and pirfenidone were 19-50%. Adding 6MWD ≥150 m and different measures of preceding disease progression to the composite common criteria reduced the percentages of patients meeting eligibility to 52% (n=516) and 4-18% (n=12-61), respectively. Patients meeting the composite common criteria had less-rapid 1-year FVC decline than those who did not (-90 versus -103 mL, p=0.01). Definite IPF generally had more-rapid 1-year FVC decline compared to provisional IPF., Conclusions: Eligibility criteria of previous IPF RCTs have limited generalisability to clinical IPF populations, with FVC decline differing between eligible and ineligible populations., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Y.H. Khor reports fellowship support from NHMRC Investigator Grant, and support for the CARE-PF registry (with no influence on this study) from Boehringer Ingelheim, during the conduct of the study. K.A. Johannson reports personal fees, non-financial support and other from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Pliant Therapeutics and Thyron, grants from University Hospital Foundation, Pulmonary Fibrosis Society of Calgary and University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, and personal fees and non-financial support from Three Lakes Foundation, outside the submitted work. V. Marcoux reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, during the conduct of the study; grants from University of British Columbia and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. J.H. Fisher reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, during the conduct of the study; grants from Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation and University of Toronto, and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. D. Assayag reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada, and lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffman La Roche, outside the submitted work. H. Manganas reports support for the present manuscript from University of British Columbia; grants from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada, Hoffmann La Roche, Galapagos and BMS, honoraria for educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada, and advisory board membership for Boehringer Ingelheim Canada, outside the submitted work. M. Kolb reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pieris and Roche, consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Horizon, Cipla, Abbvie, Bellerophon, Algernon, CSL Behring, United Therapeutics and LabCorp, lecture honoraria from Roche, Novartis and Boehringer Ingelheim, payment for expert testimony from Roche, advisory board participation with United Therapeutics and LabCorp, and reports an editorial allowance from ERJ, outside the submitted work. C.J. Ryerson reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffmann-La Roche, and personal fees from Veracyte, Pliant Therapeutics, AstraZeneca and Cipla Ltd, outside the submitted work. All other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2023. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Background: Biological sex, gender, and race are important considerations in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs)., Research Question: Does a patient's sex assigned at birth, and race, influence ILD treatment initiation?, Study Design and Methods: Patients with ILD from three longitudinal prospective registries were compared in this observational study. ILD-related medications included antifibrotics and immunomodulating medications. Race was dichotomized as "White" vs "non-White." Time to treatment initiation was determined from the date of the initial ILD registry visit to the date of first medication initiation. Proportions of treated patients were compared between groups by χ 2 test. Cox proportional analysis was used to determine how sex and race were associated with time to treatment initiation stratified by ILD diagnosis., Results: A total of 4,572 patients were included across all cohorts. The proportion of men who received treatment was higher than for women in the Canadian cohort (47% vs 40%; P < .001), and the proportion of White patients who received treatment was also higher compared with non-White patients (46% vs 36%; P < .001). In contrast, the proportion of treated men in the Chicago cohort was lower compared with women (56% vs 64%; P = .005), and that of White patients was lower compared with non-White patients (56% vs 69%; P < .001). No sex- or race-based differences in proportions of patients treated were found in the Australasian cohort. White race was significantly associated with earlier treatment initiation compared with non-White race across diagnoses in the Canadian cohort, whereas the opposite association was found in the Australasian cohort., Interpretation: Sex- and race-based differences exist in the initiation of ILD treatment, with variability across different cohorts in different countries. Reasons for these differences need to be further explored in future studies., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Part 2 of this 2-part CME introduces dermatologists to noninfectious inflammatory skin diseases associated with pulmonary involvement. In many cases, dermatologists may be the first physicians recognizing respiratory complications associated with these diagnoses. Because pulmonary involvement is often the leading cause of morbidity and mortality, dermatologists should be comfortable screening and monitoring for lung disease in high-risk patients, recognizing cutaneous stigmata of lung disease in these patients and referring to pulmonary specialists, when appropriate, for prompt treatment initiation. Some treatments used for skin disease may not be appropriate in the context of lung disease and hence, choosing a holistic approach is important. Interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension are the most common pulmonary complications and a significant cause of mortality in autoimmune connective tissue diseases, especially systemic sclerosis, dermatomyositis, and mixed connective tissue disease. Pulmonary complications, notably interstitial lung disease, are also common and life-threatening in sarcoidosis and vasculitis, while they are variable in neutrophilic and autoimmune blistering diseases., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Gniadecki received lecture fees and advisory board honoraria from Mallinckrodt and Boehringer Ingelheim. Netchiporouk received lecture fees and advisory honoraria from Mallinckrodt and Boehringer Ingelheim. Ferrara received lecture fees and advisory board honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and Astra Zeneca. Ouchene, Muntyanu, Assayag, Veilleux, Abril, Yacyshyn, Pineau, O'Brien, Baron, and Osman have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) includes a large group of conditions that lead to scarring of the lungs. The lack of available 5-level EuroQol 5D (EQ5D) data has limited the ability to conduct economic evaluations in ILD. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a mapping algorithm that predicts EQ5D utilities from commonly collected pulmonary function measurements (forced vital capacity [FVC] and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [DLCO]) in fibrotic ILDs., Methods: EQ5D utility and pulmonary function measurements from the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis were included. Ordinary least squares (OLS), beta regression, two-part, and tobit models were used to map EQ5D utilities from FVC or DLCO. Model performance was assessed by comparing the predicted and observed utilities. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to test how well models performed across different patient characteristics. The models were then externally validated in the Australian Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Registry., Results: The OLS model performed as well as other more complex models (root mean squared error: 0.17 for FVC and 0.16 for DLCO). As with the other models, the OLS algorithm performed well across the different subgroups (except for EQ5D utilities < 0.5) and in the external validation cohort., Conclusion: We developed a mapping algorithm that predicts EQ5D utilities from FVC and DLCO, with the intent that this algorithm can be applied to clinical trial populations and real-world cohorts that have not prioritized collection of health-related utilities. The mapping algorithm can be used in future economic evaluations of potential ILD therapies., Competing Interests: Drs. Wong, Johannson, Marcoux, Assayag, Manganas, Kolb, Ryerson report personal fees and/or grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Drs. Marcoux, Assayag, Kolb, and Ryerson report grants and/or personal fees from Roche Canada, outside the submitted work. Dr. Marcoux reports grants from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Drs. Wong and Assayag report personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Dr. Johannson reports grants from The Chest Foundation, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Pulmonary Fibrosis Society of Calgary, UCB Biopharma SPRL and personal fees from Blade Therapeutics, Theravance, Three Lakes Foundation, Pliant Therapeutics, and Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., outside the submitted work. Dr. Manganas reports grants from Galapagos, outside the submitted work. Dr. Kolb reports grants from Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation, grants from Canadian Institute for Health Research, grants and personal fees from Prometic, other from European Respiratory Journal, personal fees from Third Pole, MitoImmune, Abbvie, DevPro Biopharma, Horizon, Algernon, CSL Behring, and grants and personal fees from Pieris, outside the submitted work. Dr. Ryerson reports personal fees from Pliant Therapeutics and Veracyte, outside the submitted work;. Drs. Sun, Cox, Fisher, Khalil, Palmer, de Graaff, Walters, Hopkins, Zappala, Goh, Moodley, Navaratnam, Corte, and Zhang report nothing to disclose. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2023 Wong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Functional capacity, as measured by the 6-min walk test (6MWT), is often reduced in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). This study evaluated longitudinal changes and the prognostic significance of 6MWT parameters, and explored change in oxygenation status as a physiological criterion to define disease progression in patients with fibrotic ILD., Research Questions: What are the trajectories and prognostic value of 6MWT parameters in patients with fibrotic ILD?, Study Design and Methods: Using prospective registries in Australia and Canada, patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF fibrotic ILD were stratified by the presence of criteria for progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). The cumulative incidence of exertional and resting hypoxemia and changes in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and composite indices (distance-saturation product and distance-saturation-oxygen product) were determined, with prognostic significance evaluated at the time of meeting criteria for PPF. New-onset exertional or resting hypoxemia was evaluated as another potential criterion for PPF., Results: Patients with IPF/PPF (n = 126) and non-IPF/PPF (n = 227) had a similar cumulative incidence of exertional hypoxemia and annualized decline in 6MWD and composite indices, which varied across each PPF criterion. Patients with IPF/non-PPF (n = 231) and non-IPF/non-PPF (n = 531) had a significantly lower incidence of hypoxemia than those with IPF/PPF, with an annualized increase in 6MWD and composite indices in the non-IPF/non-PPF group. Exertional or resting hypoxemia at the time of meeting criteria for PPF was independently associated with reduced transplant-free survival in IPF and non-IPF, adjusting for patient demographics and lung function. Adding new-onset exertional or resting hypoxemia as a physiological criterion reduced the median time to development of PPF from 11.2 to 6.7 months in IPF and from 11.7 to 5.6 months in non-IPF in patients who eventually met both definitions (P < .001 for both)., Interpretation: Patients with IPF/PPF and non-IPF/PPF have comparable deterioration in functional capacity. Oxygenation status provides prognostic information in PPF and may assist in defining disease progression in fibrotic ILD., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Challenges for the effective management of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) include difficulties with the early detection of disease, accurate prognostication with baseline data, and accurate and precise response to therapy. The purpose of this Review is to describe the clinical and research gaps in the diagnosis and prognosis of ILD, and how machine learning can be applied to image biomarker research to close these gaps. Machine-learning algorithms can identify ILD in at-risk populations, predict the extent of lung fibrosis, correlate radiological abnormalities with lung function decline, and be used as endpoints in treatment trials, exemplifying how this technology can be used in care for people with ILD. Advances in image processing and analysis provide further opportunities to use machine learning that incorporates deep-learning-based image analysis and radiomics. Collaboration and consistency are required to develop optimal algorithms, and candidate radiological biomarkers should be validated against appropriate predictors of disease outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SMH reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and NHLBI; service contracts from Calyx outside the present work; the US patent 10,706,533 Systems and Methods for Automatic Detection and Quantification of Pathology Using Dynamic Feature Classification (assigned to National Jewish Health and not licensed); grants and consulting fees from Veracyte; consulting fees from Lyra Therapeutics and IMIDEX; and payment or honorarium for attending the 2021 World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disease Conference. PMG reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Teva, Cipla, and AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings or travel from Brainomix; and stock options in Brainomix. DA reports consulting fees and speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; and grants or contracts from Boehringer Ingelheim and Fonds de Recherche Québec–Santé. TJC reports grants or contracts from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Biogen, and Three Lakes Foundation; consulting fees from, and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Bristol Myers Squibb; payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim; and is the cochair of Australian ILD Registry. KAJ reports grants or contracts from the University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Three Lakes Foundation, and the Chest Foundation; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Pliant Therapeutics, Three Lakes Foundation, and Thyron; payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for the PFOX trial. LC reports payments or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim. AW reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and Veracyte outside the submitted work; payment or honoraria from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim; and support for attending meetings or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim (or both). SW reports grants from National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist Award CS-2018-18-ST2-004; consulting fees and payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; a leadership or fiduciary role on NHS England AI Award Advisory Panel; and is the Radiology Lead for the Open Source Imaging Consortium. IG reports consulting fees from Ad Alta, Amplia, Accendatech, and Lassen; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim; and is the cochair of Australian ILD Registry. HB, JAM, MG, FF report no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Particulate matter 2.5 μm or less in diameter (PM2.5) is associated with adverse outcomes for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, but its association with other fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (fILDs) and the association of PM2.5 composition with adverse outcomes remain unclear., Objective: To investigate the association of PM2.5 exposure with mortality and lung function among patients with fILD., Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter, international, prospective cohort study, patients were enrolled in the Simmons Center for Interstitial Lung Disease Registry at the University of Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 42 sites of the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Registry; and 8 sites of the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. A total of 6683 patients with fILD were included (Simmons, 1424; Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation, 1870; and Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis, 3389). Data were analyzed from June 1, 2021, to August 2, 2022., Exposures: Exposure to PM2.5 and its constituents was estimated with hybrid models, combining satellite-derived aerosol optical depth with chemical transport models and ground-based PM2.5 measurements., Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable linear regression was used to test associations of exposures 5 years before enrollment with baseline forced vital capacity and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide. Multivariable Cox models were used to test associations of exposure in the 5 years before censoring with mortality, and linear mixed models were used to test associations of exposure with a decrease in lung function. Multiconstituent analyses were performed with quantile-based g-computation. Cohort effect estimates were meta-analyzed. Models were adjusted for age, sex, smoking history, race, a socioeconomic variable, and site (only for Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation and Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis cohorts)., Results: Median follow-up across the 3 cohorts was 2.9 years (IQR, 1.5-4.5 years), with death for 28% of patients and lung transplant for 10% of patients. Of the 6683 patients in the cohort, 3653 were men (55%), 205 were Black (3.1%), and 5609 were White (84.0%). Median (IQR) age at enrollment across all cohorts was 66 (58-73) years. A PM2.5 exposure of 8 μg/m3 or more was associated with a hazard ratio for mortality of 4.40 (95% CI, 3.51-5.51) in the Simmons cohort, 1.71 (95% CI, 1.32-2.21) in the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation cohort, and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.18-1.79) in the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis cohort. Increasing exposure to sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium PM2.5 constituents was associated with increased mortality across all cohorts, and multiconstituent models demonstrated that these constituents tended to be associated with the most adverse outcomes with regard to mortality and baseline lung function. Meta-analyses revealed consistent associations of exposure to sulfate and ammonium with mortality and with the rate of decrease in forced vital capacity and diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide and an association of increasing levels of PM2.5 multiconstituent mixture with all outcomes., Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that exposure to PM2.5 was associated with baseline severity, disease progression, and mortality among patients with fILD and that sulfate, ammonium, and nitrate constituents were associated with the most harm, highlighting the need for reductions in human-derived sources of pollution.

Background: This multicentre, international, prospective cohort study evaluated whether patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis living in neighbourhoods with greater material and social disadvantage experience worse clinical outcomes., Methods: The area deprivation index and the Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation evaluate neighbourhood-level disadvantage in the US and Canada, with higher scores reflecting greater disadvantage. Multivariable linear regression evaluated associations of disadvantage with baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) or diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide ( D LCO ) and linear mixed effects models for associations with rate of FVC or D LCO decline, and competing hazards models were used for survival analyses in the US cohort, evaluating competing outcomes of death or lung transplantation. Adjustments were made for age at diagnosis, sex, race and smoking history., Results: We included 477 US and 122 Canadian patients with sarcoidosis. Higher disadvantage was not associated with survival or baseline FVC. The highest disadvantage quartile was associated with lower baseline D LCO in the US cohort (β = -6.80, 95% CI -13.16 to -0.44, p=0.04), with similar findings in the Canadian cohort (β = -7.47, 95% CI -20.28 to 5.33, p=0.25); with more rapid decline in FVC and D LCO in the US cohort (FVC β = -0.40, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.11, p=0.007; D LCO β = -0.59, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.23, p=0.001); and with more rapid FVC decline in the Canadian cohort (FVC β = -0.80, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.24, p=0.003)., Conclusion: Patients with sarcoidosis living in high disadvantage neighbourhoods experience worse baseline lung function and more rapid lung function decline, highlighting the need for better understanding of how neighbourhood-level factors impact individual patient outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: G.C. Goobie receives research funding and support through the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Scholars Award Program and the University of British Columbia Clinician Investigator Program. C.J. Ryerson, D. Assayag and M.R.J. Kolb report personal fees and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffman La Roche outside the submitted work. K.A. Johannson reports personal fees, nonfinancial support and other support from Boehringer Ingelheim and the Three Lakes Foundation, personal fees from Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, and grants from the University Hospital Foundation, the University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, and the Pulmonary Fibrosis Society of Calgary. V. Marcoux reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada, Hoffman La-Roche Ltd and AstraZeneca, and grants from the University of Saskatchewan and the Royal University Hospital Foundation. M.R.J. Kolb also reports personal fees and grants from GSK, Gilead, Actelion, Respivert, Genoa, Alkermes, Pharmaxis, Prometric, Indalo and Third Pole. H. Manganas reports grants from Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Galapagos and BMS, and personal fees and research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim. D. Assayag also reports personal fees and grants from Novartis. J.H. Fisher reports grants from the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation, and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca, outside of the submitted work. D.J. Kass is supported in part by AR060780, HL133232, UL1 TR001857 and AR076024 (NIH grants), Boehringer Ingelheim grants, and receives collaborative research funding from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, outside of the submitted work. Y. Zhang is supported in part by AR076024 (NIH grant). S. Keil, E. Schikowski, N. Khalil, X. Chen, K.F. Gibson and K.O. Lindell report no competing interests. S.M. Nouraie receives grant support from Boehringer Ingelheim USA., (Copyright ©The authors 2022.)

Background: Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) is characterised by progressive physiological, symptomatic and/or radiographic worsening. The real-world prevalence and characteristics of PF-ILD remain uncertain., Methods: Patients were enrolled from the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis between 2015 and 2020. PF-ILD was defined as a relative forced vital capacity (FVC) decline ≥10%, death, lung transplantation or any two of: relative FVC decline ≥5% and <10%, worsening respiratory symptoms or worsening fibrosis on computed tomography of the chest, all within 24 months of diagnosis. Time-to-event analysis compared progression between key diagnostic subgroups. Characteristics associated with progression were determined by multivariable regression., Results: Of 2746 patients with fibrotic ILD (mean±sd age 65±12 years; 51% female), 1376 (50%) met PF-ILD criteria in the first 24 months of follow-up. PF-ILD occurred in 427 (59%) patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 125 (58%) with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), 281 (51%) with unclassifiable ILD (U-ILD) and 402 (45%) with connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD). Compared with IPF, time to progression was similar in patients with HP (hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% CI 0.79-1.17), but was delayed in patients with U-ILD (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.96) and CTD-ILD (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.74). Background treatment varied across diagnostic subtypes, with 66% of IPF patients receiving antifibrotic therapy, while immunomodulatory therapy was utilised in 49%, 61% and 37% of patients with CHP, CTD-ILD and U-ILD, respectively. Increasing age, male sex, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and lower baseline pulmonary function were independently associated with progression., Conclusions: Progression is common in patients with fibrotic ILD, and is similarly prevalent in HP and IPF. Routinely collected variables help identify patients at risk for progression and may guide therapeutic strategies., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M.M. Farooqi reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: A. Dvorkin-Gheva reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: K. Donohoe reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: K. Garlick was an employee for the medical department of Boehringer Ingelheim at the time of the preparation of this manuscript. Conflict of interest: C. Scallan reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: S.G. Chong reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: S. MacIsaac reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: D. Assayag reports personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: K.A. Johannson reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pulmonary Fibrosis Society of Calgary and University of Calgary School of Medicine; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Three Lakes Foundation, Pliant Therapeutics, Theravance and Blade Therapeutics. Conflict of interest: C.D. Fell reports educational grants and research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation; personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim; Chair of the Boards for the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation. Conflict of interest: V. Marcoux reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca and Roche; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. Conflict of interest: H. Manganas reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Gilead. Conflict of interest: J. Morisset reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. Conflict of interest: A. Comes reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: J.H. Fisher reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: S. Shapera reports educational grants and research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Canada and Hoffman La-Roche Canada; served on the medical advisory board for the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation. Conflict of interest: A.S. Gershon reports a research grant from the Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation. Conflict of interest: T. To reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: A.W. Wong reports personal fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: M. Sadatsafavi reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: P.G. Wilcox reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: A.J. Halayko reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: N. Khalil reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: G. Cox reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. Conflict of interest: L. Richeldi reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from Biogen, Sanofi-Aventis, Celgene, RespiVant, CSL Behring, Nitto, Pliant Therapeutics, Cipla, Zambon, Promedior, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Fibrogen. Conflict of interest: C.J. Ryerson reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Pliant Therapeutics, Cipla and Veracyte. Conflict of interest: M. Kolb reports grants from the Canadian Institute for Health Research, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pieris and Prometic; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, European Respiratory Journal, Belerophon, United Therapeutics, Nitto Denko, MitoImmune, Pieris, AbbVie, DevPro Biopharma, Horizon, Algernon and CSL Behring. Conflict of interest: N. Hambly reports grants from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen., (Copyright ©The authors 2022. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Background and Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a frequent cause of interstitial lung disease (ILD); however, the impact of rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide antibody seropositivity in ILD without connective tissue disease (CTD) is unclear. We examined the association of seropositivity with ILD progression, mortality and response to immunosuppression in non-CTD ILD., Methods: A total of 1570 non-CTD patients (with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features or unclassifiable ILD) and 181 RA-ILD patients were included from a prospective registry. Longitudinal forced vital capacity (FVC), transplant-free survival and incidence of progressive fibrosing-ILD (PF-ILD) were compared between seronegative non-CTD ILD (reference group), seropositive non-CTD ILD and RA-ILD using linear mixed-effect and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, smoking pack-years and baseline FVC. Interaction between seropositivity and immunosuppression on FVC decline was assessed in patients with ≥6 months of follow-up before and after the treatment., Results: Two hundred and seventeen (13.8%) patients with seropositive non-CTD ILD had similar rates of FVC decline and transplant-free survival compared to seronegative non-CTD ILD, but more frequently met the criteria for PF-ILD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.35, p = 0.004). RA-ILD had slower FVC decline (p = 0.03), less PF-ILD (HR = 0.75, p = 0.03) and lower likelihood of lung transplant or death (HR = 0.66, p = 0.01) compared to seronegative non-CTD ILD. No interaction was found between seropositivity and treatment on FVC decline in non-CTD ILD., Conclusion: Seropositivity in non-CTD ILD was not associated with improved outcomes or treatment response, highlighting the importance of other disease features in determining prognosis and predicting response to immunosuppression., (© 2022 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Background and Objective: Inhalational exposures are a known cause of interstitial lung disease (ILD), but little is understood about their prevalence across ILD subtypes and their relationship with pulmonary function and survival., Methods: Patients with fibrotic ILD were identified from the multicentre Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Patients completed questionnaires regarding ILD-related occupational and environmental exposures. The relationship between exposures and the outcomes of baseline age, gender, family history, pulmonary function and survival was analysed using linear and logistic regression models, linear mixed-effect regression models and survival analysis using multivariable Cox proportional hazards along with the log-rank test., Results: There were 3820 patients included in this study, with 2385 (62%) having ILD-related inhalational exposure. Exposed patients were younger, particularly in the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis subgroup. Inhalational exposure was associated with male gender (adjusted OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.28-1.68, p < 0.001) and family history of pulmonary fibrosis (adjusted OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.40-2.15, p < 0.001). Patients with any inhalational exposure had improved transplant-free survival (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.92, p = 0.001); this effect persisted across diagnostic subtypes. The relationship between exposures and annual change in forced vital capacity varied by ILD subtype., Conclusion: Patients with fibrotic ILD report high prevalence of inhalational exposures across ILD subtypes. These exposures were associated with younger age at diagnosis, male gender and family history of pulmonary fibrosis. Identification of an inhalational exposure was associated with a survival benefit. These findings suggest that inhaled exposures may impact clinical outcomes in patients with ILD, and future work should characterize the mechanisms underlying these relationships., (© 2022 The Authors. Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Rationale: Multimorbidity is common and leads to substantial concomitant medication burden in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), which may affect tolerability of ILD-targeted medications and health outcomes. Objectives: To determine the associations of concomitant medication burden with tolerability of ILD-targeted medications and survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF ILD. Methods: Patients with IPF receiving nintedanib or pirfenidone and patients with non-IPF ILD receiving azathioprine or mycophenolate were identified from two Australian and Canadian registries. Baseline concomitant medication burden was evaluated using three measures: medication count, polypharmacy (⩾5 medications), and the medication regimen complexity index (MRCI). Medication intolerance and discontinuation were evaluated at 6 months and 1 year after initiation of ILD-targeted medications, respectively. Cox regression models and likelihood ratio tests were used to determine the prognostic significance of medication burden on transplant-free survival. Results: In 645 treated patients with IPF, 43% experienced adverse reactions leading to intolerance (defined as dose reduction, temporary dose interruption, or permanent drug discontinuation) of antifibrotic medications within 6 months of initiation, with high baseline concomitant medication burden being consistently associated with intolerance (medication count: P  = 0.005; polypharmacy: P  = 0.006; MRCI: P  = 0.004). This association was not observed for immunosuppressive medications in 1,255 treated patients with non-IPF ILD, who also had a lower intolerance (18%). Baseline concomitant medication burden was not independently associated with permanent discontinuation of antifibrotic (29%) and immunosuppressive medications (20%) at 1 year. The MRCI was the only measure of concomitant medication burden associated with transplant-free survival in both cohorts ( P  < 0.01 for both), which improved prognostication beyond common clinical factors and the ILD-GAP index ( P  < 0.001 for both). Conclusions: Concomitant medication burden is associated with intolerance of antifibrotic medications in patients with IPF. Medication regimen complexity is superior to simpler evaluation of concomitant medication burden for predicting prognosis in ILD.

Background: The impact of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on survival in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is unknown. Given the challenges conducting a large randomised controlled trial, we aimed to determine whether improvement in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) was associated with better survival., Methods: This retrospective, international cohort study included patients with fibrotic ILD participating in either inpatient or outpatient PR at 12 sites in 5 countries. Multivariable models were used to estimate the association between change in 6MWD and time to death or lung transplantation accounting for clustering by centre and other confounders., Results: 701 participants (445 men and 256 women) with fibrotic ILD were included. The mean±SD ages of the 196 inpatients and 505 outpatients were 70±11 and 69±12 years, respectively. Baseline/changes in 6MWD were 262±128/55±83 m for inpatients and 358±125/34±65 m for outpatients. Improvement in 6MWD during PR was associated with lower hazard rates for death or lung transplant on adjusted analysis for both inpatient (HR per 10 m 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.97, p<0.001) and outpatient PR (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.00, p=0.042). Participation in ≥80% of planned outpatient PR sessions was associated with a 33% lower risk of death (95% CI 0.49% to 0.92%)., Conclusions: Patients with fibrotic ILD who improved physical performance during PR had better survival compared with those who did not improve performance. Confirmation of these hypothesis-generating findings in a randomised controlled trial would be required to definitely change clinical practice, and would further support efforts to improve availability of PR for patients with fibrotic ILD., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Obesity is a health epidemic associated with greater morbidity and mortality in the general population. Mass loading of the thorax from obesity leads to a restrictive pulmonary defect that reduces lung capacity in obese individuals without pulmonary disease, and may exacerbate the restrictive pulmonary physiology that is characteristic of interstitial lung disease (ILD). The purpose of this study was to test the association of body mass index (BMI) with pulmonary function, functional capacity, and patient-reported outcomes (dyspnea and quality of life) in patients with ILD. We analyzed 3169 patients with fibrotic ILD from the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Patients were subcategorized as underweight (BMI<18.5 kg/m 2 ), normal weight (18.5≤BMI<25), overweight (25≤BMI<30), obese I (30≤BMI<35), obese II (35≤BMI<40), and obese III (BMI>40). Analysis was performed using a linear regression with adjustment for common prognostic variables. Overweight and obese BMI categories were associated with worse pulmonary function, functional capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life compared to normal weight. This is likely a result of mass loading on the thorax, and we speculate that intentional weight-loss may improve lung function and functional capacity in obese patients with fibrotic ILD. The underweight BMI category was also associated with worse functional capacity compared to normal weight, which may reflect greater disease severity or the presence of other comorbidities. Future work should explore the clinical utility of BMI to improve patient outcomes., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (fILD) is a group of pathologic entities characterized by scarring of the lungs and high morbidity and mortality. Research investigating how socioeconomic and residential factors impact outcomes in patients with fILD is lacking. Objectives: To determine the association between neighborhood-level disadvantage and presentation severity, disease progression, lung transplantation, and mortality in patients with fILD from the United States and Canada. Methods: We performed a multicenter, international, prospective cohort study of 4,729 patients with fILD from one U.S. and eight Canadian ILD registry sites. Neighborhood-level disadvantage was measured by the area deprivation index in the United States and the Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation in Canada. Measurements and Main Results: In the U.S. but not in the Canadian cohort, patients with fILD living in neighborhoods with the greatest disadvantage (top quartile) experience the highest risk of mortality (hazard ratio = 1.51, P  = 0.002), and in subgroups of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the top quartile of disadvantage experienced the lowest odds of lung transplantation (odds ratio = 0.46, P  = 0.04). Greater disadvantage was associated with reduced baseline DL CO in both cohorts, but it was not associated with baseline FVC or FVC or DL CO decline in either cohort. Conclusions: Patients with fILD who live in areas with greater neighborhood-level disadvantage in the United States experience higher mortality, and patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis experience lower odds of lung transplantation. These disparities are not seen in Canadian patients, which may indicate differences in access to care between the United States and Canada.

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, fatal fibrotic interstitial lung disease. Few circulating biomarkers have been identified to have causal effects on IPF., Methods: To identify candidate IPF-influencing circulating proteins, we undertook an efficient screen of circulating proteins by applying a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) approach with existing publicly available data. For instruments, we used genetic determinants of circulating proteins which reside cis to the encoded gene ( cis -single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)), identified by two genome-wide association studies (GWASs) in European individuals (3301 and 3200 subjects). We then applied MR methods to test if the levels of these circulating proteins influenced IPF susceptibility in the largest IPF GWAS (2668 cases and 8591 controls). We validated the MR results using colocalisation analyses to ensure that both the circulating proteins and IPF shared a common genetic signal., Results: MR analyses of 834 proteins found that a 1 sd increase in circulating galactoside 3(4)-l-fucosyltransferase (FUT3) and α-(1,3)-fucosyltransferase 5 (FUT5) was associated with a reduced risk of IPF (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88; p=6.3×10 -7 and OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.86; p=1.1×10 -5 , respectively). Sensitivity analyses including multiple cis -SNPs provided similar estimates both for FUT3 (inverse variance weighted (IVW) OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78-0.91; p=9.8×10 -6 and MR-Egger OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.97; p=0.03) and FUT5 (IVW OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.92; p=1.4×10 -4 and MR-Egger OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.90; p=0.01). FUT3 and FUT5 signals colocalised with IPF signals, with posterior probabilities of a shared genetic signal of 99.9% and 97.7%, respectively. Further transcriptomic investigations supported the protective effects of FUT3 for IPF., Conclusions: An efficient MR scan of 834 circulating proteins provided evidence that genetically increased circulating FUT3 level is associated with reduced risk of IPF., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: T. Nakanishi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Cerani has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Forgetta has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Zhou has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R.J. Allen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: O.C. Leavy has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Koido has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Assayag reports grants and personal fees for consultancy from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada, personal fees for consultancy from Hoffman-LaRoche Canada, personal fees for lectures from AstraZeneca Canada, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R.G. Jenkins reports grants from AstraZeneca, Biogen, Galecto and GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Daewoong, Galapagos, Heptares, Promedior and Roche, nonfinancial support from NuMedii and Redx, grants and personal fees from Pliant, other (trustee) from Action for Pulmonary Fibrosis, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L.V. Wain reports grants from GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: I.V. Yang reports grants from the NIH and personal fees from Eleven P15 related to research in pulmonary fibrosis, outside the submitted work; and has a patent “Circulating biomarkers of preclinical pulmonary fibrosis” pending. Conflict of interest: G.M. Lathrop has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P.J. Wolters reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche/Genentech, personal fees from Gossamer Bio, Blade Therapeutics and Pliant, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: D.A. Schwartz reports grants from the NIH-NHLBI (R38-HL143511, T32-HL007085, UG3/UH3-HL151865, R01-HL149836, P01-HL0928701, UH2/3-HL123442, X01-HL134585 and R25-ES025476) and DOD Focused Program Grant W81XWH-17-1-0597, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Eleven P15, outside the submitted work; and has a patent “Compositions and methods of treating or preventing fibrotic diseases” pending, a patent “Biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of fibrotic lung disease” pending and a patent “Methods and compositions for risk prediction, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of pulmonary disorders” issued. Conflict of interest: J.B. Richards has served as an advisor to GlaxoSmithKline and Deerfield Capital., (Copyright ©The authors 2022.)

Rationale: Longitudinal data on the impact of continued, switched or discontinued antifibrotic therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who have disease progression is needed., Objective: We hypothesized that ongoing antifibrotic use (versus discontinuation) in the setting of forced vital capacity (FVC) decline would be associated with less future decline and lower likelihood of a composite outcome of FVC decline, lung transplant, or death., Methods: We performed a multicenter cohort study using data from the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis in patients with IPF with FVC decline ≥10% over 6 months on antifibrotic therapy. The association of continued, switched or discontinued therapy with (1) further change in FVC and (2) a composite of FVC decline ≥10%, transplant, or death, in the subsequent 6 months, was assessed using adjusted linear and logistic regression modelling, respectively. Generalized estimating equations accounted for repeated observations per patient., Results: 165 patients had a decline in FVC ≥10% over 6 months while receiving antifibrotic therapy. Compared to continued use, antifibrotic discontinuation after FVC decline was associated with greater additional FVC decline (-207 mL 95%CI -353 to -62, p = 0.005) and higher odds of FVC decline ≥10%, transplant, or death (odds ratio 12.2 95%CI 1.2 to 130.5, p = 0.04). There was no difference between continued versus switched antifibrotic therapy., Conclusions: Ongoing antifibrotic therapy in the setting of FVC decline is associated with less future FVC decline and lower odds of FVC decline ≥10%, transplant, or death in a real-world cohort of IPF., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Early access to subspecialty care is associated with improved outcomes for patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). Access to ILD care may be limited for patients living far from subspecialty clinics. Objectives: To test the hypothesis that greater travel distance to access ILD clinical care would be associated with more severe disease at time of referral and worse clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients with fibrotic ILD were recruited from a multicenter national pulmonary fibrosis registry. Residential postal codes were geocoded to estimate travel distance from the home to the clinic. Travel distance was dichotomized at ⩽70 km (near) and >70 km (far). Demographics and disease severity at the initial referral, changes in lung function, and the risk of death or lung transplant were analyzed in unadjusted and adjusted models for their association with travel distance. Results: The cohort included 1,162 patients, of whom 856 lived near to their ILD clinic and 306 lived far from their ILD clinic. Patients residing farther from their clinic were younger, more likely to have smoked, had a greater 6-minute-walk distance, and had lower composite risk scores than patients residing closer to their clinic. In models adjusted for age, sex, and baseline forced vital capacity, patients from farther away had a greater risk of death or lung transplant than patients residing closer (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.11), a finding predominantly driven by patients with connective tissue disease-related ILD (hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.16-3.94). Conclusions: Patients with fibrotic ILD with a longer travel distance to their ILD clinic had better prognostic indices at baseline but had a higher risk of death or lung transplant in the total cohort and in patients with connective tissue disease-related ILD. Assuming that disease epidemiology and severity are distributed evenly across geographic regions, these findings raise important questions about equitable access to patient care in large healthcare regions with centralized subspecialty programs.

Sex and gender differences influence key domains of research, lung health, healthcare access and healthcare delivery. In interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), mouse models of pulmonary fibrosis are clearly influenced by sex hormones. Additionally, short telomeres, a biomarker of telomere regulation gene mutations, are impacted by sex, while heritability unexplained by genetic variation may be attributable to gendered environmental factors that drive epigenetic control. Diseases like idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, occupational ILDs, connective tissue-associated ILDs and lymphangioleiomyomatosis have different prevalence and prognosis between men and women. These differences arise from a complex interplay between biological sex and sociocultural gender influencing genetics, epigenomic modifiers, hormones, immune function, response to treatment and interaction with healthcare systems. Much work remains to be done to systematically integrate sex and gender analysis into relevant domains of science and clinical care in ILD, from strategic considerations for establishing research priorities to guidelines for establishing best clinical practices. Accounting for sex and gender in ILD is essential to the practice of individualised, patient-centred medicine., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: L. Kawano-Dourado has nothing to disclose. Conflicts of interest: M.K. Glassberg has nothing to disclose. Conflicts of interest: D. Assayag has nothing to disclose. Conflicts of interest: R. Borie has nothing to disclose. Conflicts of interest: K.A. Johannson has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2021.)

Rationale: Real-life pharmacological treatment patterns of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD) remain elusive. Objectives: To determine how often and with what medications patients with ILD are treated in Canadian tertiary care clinics. Methods: All patients with ILD prospectively enrolled in the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis were included in this observational study. All first instances of medication for each patient were compiled. The time between the diagnosis of ILD and the first initiation of an ILD-related medication was compared across diagnostic categories. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify variables associated with time-to-treatment initiation, stratified by diagnostic category. Results: Out of 2,652 patients, a total of 1,483 (56%) were treated with an ILD-related medication during the median follow up of 3.0 years (1.4-5.9), including 349/646 (54%) patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who received an antifibrotic. Patients with IPF were treated earlier and in greater proportion than those with non-IPF ILD ( P  = 0.001). Male sex and lower lung function were associated with shorter time-to-treatment initiation in the full cohort. Conclusions: Overall, 56% of patients with ILD seen across seven Canadian specialized ILD clinics received pharmacological treatment over a median follow up of 3 years. Further studies are needed to assess longitudinal patterns of treatment and their influence on key outcomes.

Rationale: The University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSDSOBQ) is a frequently used domain-specific dyspnea questionnaire; however, there is little information available regarding its use and minimum important difference (MID) in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). We aimed to describe the key performance characteristics of the UCSDSOBQ in this population., Methods: UCSDSOBQ scores and selected anchors were measured in 1933 patients from the prospective multi-center Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Anchors included the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), percent-predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO%), and 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Concurrent validity, internal consistency, ceiling and floor effects, and responsiveness were assessed, followed by estimation of the MID by anchor-based (linear regression) and distribution-based methods (standard error of measurement)., Results: The UCSDSOBQ had a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.97), no obvious floor or ceiling effect, strong correlations with SGRQ, EQ-5D-5L, and EQ-VAS (|r| > 0.5), and moderate correlations with FVC%, DLCO%, and 6MWD (0.3 < |r| < 0.5). The MID estimate for UCSDSOBQ was 5 points (1-8) for the anchor-based method, and 4.5 points for the distribution-based method., Conclusion: This study demonstrates the validity of UCSDSOBQ in a large and heterogeneous population of patients with fibrotic ILD, and provides a robust MID estimate of 5-8 points.

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common comorbidity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and may contribute to its progression. Anti-acid therapy, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), has been considered as a potential treatment option for IPF. The evidence for this treatment comes from several observational studies affected by time-related bias., Research Question: Is use of PPIs in patients with IPF associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality, respiratory-related mortality, and respiratory-related hospitalization?, Study Design and Methods: We used the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink to identify a cohort of patients diagnosed with IPF between 2003 and 2016. The prevalent new-user cohort design was used to match patients initiating PPIs with non-users using time-conditional propensity scores, with follow-up until death or end of observation. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs of death and of a respiratory-related hospitalization, correcting for informative censoring by inverse probability weighting., Results: There were 1,852 PPI users who were matched to 1,852 non-users identified among the cohort of patients with IPF, with a median survival of 2.8 years (mortality rate, 26.7 per 100 per year). The HR of all-cause mortality with PPI use was 1.07 (95% CI, 0.94-1.22), relative to non-use. For respiratory-related mortality, the HR was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.94-1.28) and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.86-1.16) for respiratory-related hospitalizations., Interpretation: PPI use was not associated with lower mortality or hospitalization incidence in this large study conducted among patients with IPF within a real-world setting of clinical practice and designed to avoid the time-related biases affecting previous studies. PPIs may not be as beneficial in treating IPF as suggested by some studies and conditionally recommended in treatment guidelines., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: The European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a multidimensional patient-reported questionnaire that supports calculation of quality-adjusted life-years. Our objectives were to demonstrate feasibility of use and to calculate the minimum important difference (MID) of the EQ-5D-5L and its associated visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD)., Methods: Patients who completed the EQ-5D-5L were identified from the prospective multicentre CAnadian REgistry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Validity, internal consistency and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L were assessed, followed by calculation of the MID for the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS. Anchor-based methods used an unadjusted linear regression against pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and dyspnoea and other quality of life questionnaires. Distribution-based method used one-half SD and SE measurement (SEM) calculations., Results: 1816 patients were analysed, including 472 (26%) with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. EQ-5D-5L scores were strongly correlated with the dyspnoea and other quality of life questionnaires and weakly associated with PFTs. The estimated MID for EQ-5D-5L ranged from 0.0050 to 0.054 and from 0.078 to 0.095 for the anchor-based and distribution-based methods, respectively. The MID for EQ-VAS ranged from 0.5 to 5.0 and from 8.0 to 9.7 for the anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Findings were similar across ILD subtypes, sex and age., Conclusion: We used a large and diverse cohort of patients with a variety of fibrotic ILD subtypes to suggest validity and MID of both the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS. These findings will assist in designing future clinical trials and supporting cost-effectiveness analyses of potential treatments for patients with fibrotic ILD., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CJR, MRJK, JM, KF, NH and DA report personal fees and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffman La Roche outside the submitted work. HM reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim. SS reports personal fees and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca Canada, and participation in clinical trials as site PI in Prometric Canada, Sanofi-Aventis, Gilead Pharmaceuticals, and Galapagos. KF also reports personal fees and grants from Theravance, Blade Therapeutics, Chest Foundation, University of Calgary School of Medicine, Pulmonary Fibrosis Society of Calgary, UCB Biopharma SPRL. NH also reports personal fees and grants from Actelion, Bayer and Novartis. MK also reports personal fees and grants from GSK, Gilead, Actelion, Respivert, Genoa, Alkermes, Pharmaxis, Prometric, Indalo and Third Pole. DA also reports personal fees and grants from Novartis. APYT, AW, SAH, GC, PGW, JF, MS, AG, CF, NK, AH and TT report no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Comorbidities are frequent and have been associated with poor quality of life, increased hospitalizations, and mortality in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, it is unclear how comorbidities lead to these negative outcomes and whether they could influence ILD disease progression. The goal of this study was to identify clusters of patients based on similar comorbidity profiles and to determine whether these clusters were associated with rate of lung function decline and/or mortality., Methods: Patients with a major fibrotic ILD (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, connective tissue disease-associated ILD, and unclassifiable ILD) from the CAnadian REgistry for Pulmonary Fibrosis (CARE-PF) were included. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering of comorbidities, age, sex, and smoking pack-years was conducted for each ILD subtype to identify combinations of these features that frequently occurred together in patients. The association between clusters and change in lung function over time was determined using linear mixed effects modeling, with adjustment for age, sex, and smoking pack-years. Kaplan Meier curves were used to assess differences in survival between the clusters., Results: Discrete clusters were identified within each fibrotic ILD. In IPF, males with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) had more rapid decline in FVC %-predicted (- 11.9% per year [95% CI - 15.3, - 8.5]) compared to females without any comorbidities (- 8.1% per year [95% CI - 13.6, - 2.7]; p = 0.03). Females without comorbidities also had significantly longer survival compared to all other IPF clusters. There were no significant differences in rate of lung function decline or survival between clusters in the other fibrotic ILD subtypes., Conclusions: The combination of male sex and OSA may portend worse outcomes in IPF. Further research is required to elucidate the interplay between sex and comorbidities in ILD, as well as the role of OSA in ILD disease progression.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has affected virtually all aspects of patient care. Health-care systems around the world are trying simultaneously to treat patients with COVID-19, prepare for its long-term impacts, and treat patients with other acute and chronic diseases. There are multiple ways that the COVID-19 pandemic will directly affect patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), particularly given their common risk factors for poor outcomes. Major issues for patients with ILD will include restricted access to key components of the diagnostic process, new uncertainties in the use of common ILD pharmacotherapies, limited ability to monitor both disease severity and the presence of medication adverse effects, and significantly curtailed research activities. The purpose of this review is to summarize how COVID-19 has impacted key components of the diagnosis and management of fibrotic ILD as well as to provide strategies to mitigate these challenges. We further review major obstacles for researchers and identify priority areas for future ILD research related to COVID-19. Our goals are to provide practical considerations to support the care of patients with ILD during the COVID-19 pandemic and to provide a road map for clinicians caring for these patients during future infectious disease outbreaks., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patient sex has clinical and prognostic implications in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). It is not known if sex-related and gender-related discrepancies exist when establishing a diagnosis of IPF. The aim was to determine how patient gender influences the diagnosis of IPF and the physician's diagnostic confidence., Methods: This study was performed using clinical cases compiled from a single centre, then scored by respiratory physicians for a prior study. Using clinical information, physicians were asked to provide up to five diagnoses, together with their diagnostic confidence. Logistic regression was used to assess the odds of receiving a diagnosis of IPF based on patient gender. Prognostic discrimination between IPF and non-IPF was used to assess diagnostic accuracy with Cox proportional hazards modelling., Results: Sixty cases were scored by 404 physicians. IPF was diagnosed more frequently in men compared with women (37.8% vs 10.6%; p<0.0001), and with greater mean diagnostic confidence (p<0.001). The odds of a male patient receiving an IPF diagnosis was greater than that of female patients, after adjusting for confounders (OR=3.05, 95% CI: 2.81 to 3.31), especially if the scan was not definite for the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern. Mortality was higher in women (HR=2.21, 95% CI: 2.02 to 2.41) than in men with an IPF diagnosis (HR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.33), suggesting that men were more often misclassified as having IPF., Conclusion: Patient gender influences diagnosis of IPF: women may be underdiagnosed and men overdiagnosed with IPF., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DA reports personal fees and other from Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, personal fees and other from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. JM reports personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. JK reports personal fees and other from Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, personal fees and other from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Theravance, grants from CHEST Foundation, grants from UCB Biopharma SPR, grants from University of Calgary, outside the submitted work; AW reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Intermune/Roche, personal fees from Bayer, outside the submitted work; SW reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Intermune/Roche, personal fees from Sanofi-Genzyme, personal fees from Bracco, personal fees from Oncoarendi therapeutics, outside the submitted work;, (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Given the phenotypic similarities between rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) (hereafter, RA-ILD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, we hypothesized that the strongest risk factor for the development of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the gain-of-function MUC5B promoter variant rs35705950, would also contribute to the risk of ILD among patients with RA., Methods: Using a discovery population and multiple validation populations, we tested the association of the MUC5B promoter variant rs35705950 in 620 patients with RA-ILD, 614 patients with RA without ILD, and 5448 unaffected controls., Results: Analysis of the discovery population revealed an association of the minor allele of the MUC5B promoter variant with RA-ILD when patients with RA-ILD were compared with unaffected controls (adjusted odds ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8 to 5.2; P=9.7×10 -17 ). The MUC5B promoter variant was also significantly overrepresented among patients with RA-ILD, as compared with unaffected controls, in an analysis of the multiethnic case series (adjusted odds ratio, 5.5; 95% CI, 4.2 to 7.3; P=4.7×10 -35 ) and in a combined analysis of the discovery population and the multiethnic case series (adjusted odds ratio, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.9 to 5.8; P=1.3×10 -49 ). In addition, the MUC5B promoter variant was associated with an increased risk of ILD among patients with RA (adjusted odds ratio in combined analysis, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.8 to 5.4; P=7.4×10 -5 ), particularly among those with evidence of usual interstitial pneumonia on high-resolution computed tomography (adjusted odds ratio in combined analysis, 6.1; 95% CI, 2.9 to 13.1; P=2.5×10 -6 ). However, no significant association with the MUC5B promoter variant was observed for the diagnosis of RA alone., Conclusions: We found that the MUC5B promoter variant was associated with RA-ILD and more specifically associated with evidence of usual interstitial pneumonia on imaging. (Funded by Société Française de Rhumatologie and others.).