Search

Introduction This phase I, open-label, multiple-dose, two-treatment study assessed the relationship between edoxaban equivalent concentration derived from an anti-FXa assay with the summed concentration of edoxaban and its active metabolite, M-4, as assessed by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). This study also assessed the relationship between edoxaban plasma concentrations assessed by LC/MS/MS in sodium citrate and lithium heparin tubes. Materials and methods Healthy volunteers were randomized to receive once-daily edoxaban 60 mg or 90 mg for 5 days (15 participants per treatment group). Serial blood samples were collected for analysis by LC/MS/MS and by the anti-FXa assay. Edoxaban equivalent levels were assessed using a commercially available anti-FXa activity assay with an edoxaban-specific setup. Results and conclusions The day 5 concentration estimates were significantly correlated between the 2 assays ( P < 0.0001 for both edoxaban doses). The geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratio (90% confidence interval) for edoxaban equivalent concentrations vs edoxaban + M-4 concentrations was 114.3% (108.2–120.8) for edoxaban 60 mg ( P < 0.0001) and 113.0% (107.1–119.2) for edoxaban 90 mg ( P = 0.0002). The GLSM ratio for edoxaban concentrations in sodium citrate vs lithium heparin tubes for 60-mg and 90-mg edoxaban doses were 82.8% (78.5–87.3) and 83.9% (79.1–89.0), respectively. In this study, an anti-FXa chromogenic assay with edoxaban-specific calibrators and controls demonstrated good accuracy in estimating edoxaban concentrations across a wide range of concentrations relative to LC/MS/MS at steady state following the administration of once-daily edoxaban for 5 days. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The high concentrated thrombin time (hcTT), a thrombin time modified by increasing the thrombin concentration, is a possible alternative assay to activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring. This study aimed to determine the optimal thrombin concentration used in the hcTT assay for UFH monitoring., Methods: A total of 30 blood samples obtained from healthy volunteers were included in this study. Thrombin concentrations of 10.0, 15.0, 20.0, and 25.0 IU/ml were used in the hcTT assay. The consistency between the hcTT and anti-FXa assays was evaluated. To validate the hcTT assay, linearity, repeatability, reproducibility, and diagnostic performance of the assay were assessed., Results: The hcTT assay using thrombin concentration of 15.0 IU/ml showed a strong correlation to the anti-FXa assay with R 2 of 0.72 and the Spearman's correlation coefficient (r s ) of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.98). Within-run and day-to-day run variabilities of the assay were satisfactory (all coefficients of variation <10%). We found an excellent correlation between the results which were measured using different reagents with intra- or inter-laboratory instruments. Notably, as compared to the aPTT assay, the hcTT assay showed a significantly better performance in identifying the samples which contain UFH at the supratherapeutic level, with an AUC of 0.97 vs. 0.91, p = 0.049., Conclusion: The hcTT assay can be used as an alternative assay for UFH therapy monitoring. A further study using clinical samples is recommended to confirm the appropriateness of the hcTT assay for clinical application., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Abstract: Fluorogenic assays have many potential advantages over traditional clot-based and chromogenic assays such as the absence of interference from a range of factor deficiencies as well as offering the possibility of assays in platelet rich plasma or whole blood. A fluorogenic anti-factor Xa (anti-FXa) assay has been developed for the determination of unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), namely enoxaparin and tinzaparin, and the synthetic heparinoid danaparoid, in commercial human pooled plasma. The assay was based on the complexation of heparin-spiked plasmas with exogenous FXa at a concentration of 4nM in the presence of 0.9μM of the fluorogenic substrate methylsulfonyl-d-cyclohexylalanyl-glycyl-arginine-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin acetate (Pefafluor FXa). Pooled plasma samples were spiked with concentrations of anticoagulants in the range 0–1.6U/ml. The assay was capable of the measurement of UFH and danaparoid in the range 0–1U/ml, and enoxaparin and tinzaparin in the range 0–0.8 and 0–0.6U/ml, respectively. Correlation coefficients generated by linear regression of the log/lin data analysis were between 0.93 and 0.96 for the anticoagulants tested. Assay percentage coefficients of variation were typically below 7%. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Although the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) has historically been the method of choice for anticoagulation monitoring in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support with intravenous unfractionated heparin, it is being progressively superseded by the anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) method. A retrospective single-arm, single-centre analysis of 20 patients who underwent total artificial heart implantation entailed simultaneous determinations of aPTT and anti-Xa. Agreement between these parameters was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. Despite a positive correlation between aPTT and anti-Xa, normal target ranges were poorly aligned: from 5th to 30th postoperative day, for anti-Xa values of 0.2 and 0.4 U/ml corresponding aPTT values were 52.1 and 65.2 s, 7.9 and 14.8 lower than predicted values, respectively. This was not associated with thromboembolic sequalae. It was not possible to demonstrate a significant relationship between the predictor variables (postoperative day; white blood cell count; C-reactive protein concentration; alanine transaminase and alkaline phosphatase level; bilirubin; haemoglobin; albumin and total protein concentration) and the agreement between aPTT and anti-Xa levels. In summary, when anti-Xa levels were used to guide anticoagulation therapy, corresponding aPTT levels were low with respect to target range. Methodology applied in this study is generalizable to other forms of mechanical circulatory support., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.)

Introduction: Heparin is one of the oldest biological medicines with an established role in prevention and treatment of arterial and venous thromboembolism. Published therapeutic ranges for unfractionated heparin (UFH) mostly precede the large increase in the number of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagent/instrument combinations that now show wide variability. Areas covered: This paper explores the use of UFH, the development of heparin therapeutic ranges (HTRs), and the strengths and limitations of the methods used to monitor heparin's anticoagulant effect. Expert commentary: Despite longstanding use of UFH for management of thromboembolic conditions, the optimal test for monitoring UFH remains undetermined. Although used extensively for monitoring UFH, routine APTT-derived HTRs are based on limited science that may have little relevance to current laboratory practice. Anti-FXa levels may provide better and more reliable HTRs; however, even these levels show considerable inter-laboratory variation, and there are insufficient clinical studies proving improved clinical efficacy. Alternative tests for monitoring UFH reported over time have not been proven effective nor feasible, secondary to technical or cost issues, or lack of general adoption. Thus, despite limited evidence of clinical utility, an uncomfortable marriage of convenience represented by heparin laboratory monitoring is unlikely to be terminated in the immediate future.