Search

Objectives. Prolactin (PRL) is a lactation-inducing hormone with immunomodulatory properties and is found at elevated levels in the serum of patients with RA and other rheumatic diseases. The PRL receptor (PRLR) has been shown to be expressed by macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques. The aim of this study was to examine PRLR expression by synovial macrophages and its role in the regulation of macrophage activation. Methods. Serum monomeric 23 kDa PRL levels were measured in 119 RA patients using a fluoroimmunometric assay. PRLR expression was assessed in synovial tissue of 91 RA, 15 PsA and 8 OA patients by immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis. Double IF was used to identify PRLR-expressing cells. The effects of PRL on monocyte-derived macrophage gene expression were examined by quantitative real-time PCR and ELISA. Results. Serum PRL levels were similar in female and male RA patients. Median (interquartile range) PRLR expression was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in RA and PsA synovial tissue compared with OA. PRLR colocalized with synovial CD68(+) macrophages and von Willebrand factor(+) endothelial cells. In vitro, PRLR was prominently expressed in IFN-gamma-and IL-10-polarized macrophages compared with other polarizing conditions. PRL by itself had negligible effects on macrophage gene expression, but cooperated with CD40L and TNF to increase expression of pro-inflammatory genes including IL-6, IL-8 and IL-12 beta. Conclusions. Synovial PRLR expression is enhanced in patients with inflammatory arthritis compared with OA, and PRL cooperates with other pro-inflammatory stimuli to activate macrophages. These results identify PRL and PRLR as potential new therapeutic targets in inflammatory arthritis.

The pituitary-derived hormone prolactin has been suggested to stimulate the development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease through its effects on metabolism and inflammation. In this study, we aimed to challenge the hypothesis that inhibition of prolactin function may beneficially affect atherosclerosis burden. Hereto, atherosclerosis-susceptible LDL receptor (Ldlr) knockout mice were transplanted with bone marrow from transgenic mice expressing the pure prolactin receptor antagonist Del1-9-G129R-hPRL or their non-transgenic littermates as control. Recipient mice expressing Del1-9-G129R-hPRL exhibited a decrease in plasma cholesterol levels (−29%; PP3 μm2 for Del1-9-G129R-hPRL vs 259±32×103 μm2 for controls) and the lesional macrophage and collagen contents were not different between the two groups of bone marrow recipients. Importantly, Del1-9-G129R-hPRL exposure increased levels of circulating neutrophils (+91%; PPPPLdlr knockout mice. Despite an associated decrease in VLDL/LDL cholesterol levels, application of the prolactin receptor antagonist Del1-9-G129R-hPRL does not alter the susceptibility for initial development of atherosclerotic lesions probably due to the parallel increase in circulating leukocyte concentrations.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) account for approximately 30% of all deaths globally. The most important cause of CVD is atherothrombosis, in other words, narrowing of the arteries as a result of the deposition of cholesterol and other lipoid substances within the arterial wall. Several endocrine disorders have been linked to this pathological state. Recent clinical and experimental studies have suggested that prolactin, a pleiotropic pituitary hormone, may potentially contribute to CVD, either through direct modulation of local cellular processes within atherosclerotic plaques/thrombi and/or through influencing conventional cardiovascular metabolic risk factors. However, the precise role of prolactin in the pathology of CVD remains largely unknown. Here, the authors speculate whether prolactin-lowering treatment may become a future therapeutic approach in patients with elevated prolactin levels and concomitantly presenting with coexisting vascular disease or a significantly elevated risk for premature atherothrombotic vascular disease. Awareness of these new developments may also change our clinical opinions about therapeutic strategies in patients with prolactinomas.

Atherosclerotic vascular disease is the consequence of a chronic inflammatory process, and prolactin has been shown to be a component of the inflammatory response. Additionally, recent studies indicate that prolactin contributes to an atherogenic phenotype. We hypothesized that this may be the result of a direct effect of prolactin on atherogenesis through activation of the prolactin receptor. Human carotid atherosclerotic plaques were obtained from patients by endarteriectomies. The mRNA of prolactin receptor, but not of prolactin, was detected in these atherosclerotic plaques by quantitative real-time PCR. In situ hybridization confirmed the expression of the prolactin receptor in mononuclear cells. Analysis at the protein level using immunohistochemistry and immunoelectron microscopy revealed that the prolactin receptor was abundantly present in macrophages near the lipid core and shoulder regions of the plaques. Our findings demonstrate that the prolactin receptor is present in macrophages of the atherosclerotic plaque at sites of most prominent inflammation. We therefore propose that prolactin receptor signaling contributes to the local inflammatory response within the atherosclerotic plaque and thus to atherogenesis. Journal of Endocrinology (2011) 208, 107-117

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this trial was to determine whether obese patients benefit from treatment with rimonabant in terms of progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Rimonabant, a selective cannabinoid-1 receptor blocker, reduces body weight and improves cardiometabolic risk factors in patients who are obese. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS, INTERVENTIONS AND RESULTS: A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Atherosclerosis Underlying Development assessed by Intima-media Thickness in patients On Rimonabant (AUDITOR)) randomised 661 patients with abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome to rimonabant or placebo for 30 months of treatment. The absolute change in the average value for six segments of far wall carotid intima-media thickness from baseline to month 30 was 0.010 ± 0.095 mm in the rimonabant group and 0.012 ± 0.091 mm in the placebo group (p=0.67). The annualised change was an increase of 0.005 ± 0.042 mm for the rimonabant-treated group and 0.007 ± 0.043 mm for the placebo-treated group (p=0.45). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in atherosclerosis progression between patients receiving rimonabant for 30 months and those receiving placebo for the primary efficacy measure (absolute change in carotid intima-media thickness). These findings are consistent with a similar study using coronary intravascular ultrasound and another study evaluating the occurrence of cardiovascular events. Our findings suggest that a 5% loss of body weight over a 30-month period with rimonabant is insufficient to modify atherosclerosis progression in the carotid artery in obese patients with metabolic syndrome. Clinical trial registration information clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00228176

Prolactin may contribute to an atherogenic phenotype. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that prolactin levels increase in situations of acute stress and inflammation. We therefore aimed to investigate the relationship between prolactin, acute stress and inflammation in patients with myocardial infarction. We performed a case-control study in 40 patients with myocardial infarction and 39 controls, aged 41-84 years. Blood for assessment of prolactin and high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was drawn at inclusion, that is, during the acute phase of the event, and 2-3 weeks later. Unexpectedly, prolactin levels at inclusion did not differ between cases and controls (7.0ng/ml and 6.0ng/ml, respectively, p = 0.28). 2-3 weeks later prolactin levels in cases had not decreased. However, univariate regression analysis indicated that hsCRP is associated with prolactin levels (regression coefficient beta 0.11; [95% CI 0.01; 0.21]; p = 0.03) in cases during the acute phase of myocardial infarction. Our findings may suggest that prolactin is involved in the systemic inflammatory response, which takes place during myocardial infarction; however, this association may not be strong enough to induce higher prolactin levels in patients with myocardial infarction.

Several endocrine disorders have been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. In addition, even subtle hormonal disturbances may modulate the function of cardiovascular organs. In this article, we discuss in detail the contribution of thyroid hormones, cortisol, the somatotropic hormones, and prolactin in the development of CVD. We do not only discuss epidemiological evidence on the association between hormones and cardiovascular disease, but we also address possible pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this association. In fact, hormones can contribute to the development of CVD both indirectly by inducing secondary metabolic changes such as hypertension, insulin resistance, or dyslipidemia, and directly by modulation of cellular pathways that are important in the process of atherosclerotic plaque formation (atherogenesis), plaque instability, and thrombosis. To date several new therapeutic approaches that focus on the control of hormones at the tissue level, independently of their circulating levels, are being developed. These may offer new possibilities for cardiovascular risk reduction.