Search

Abstract Background Medical three-dimensional (3D) printing has demonstrated utility and value in anatomic models for vascular conditions. A writing group composed of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Special Interest Group on 3D Printing (3DPSIG) provides appropriateness recommendations for vascular 3D printing indications. Methods A structured literature search was conducted to identify all relevant articles using 3D printing technology associated with vascular indications. Each study was vetted by the authors and strength of evidence was assessed according to published appropriateness ratings. Results Evidence-based recommendations for when 3D printing is appropriate are provided for the following areas: aneurysm, dissection, extremity vascular disease, other arterial diseases, acute venous thromboembolic disease, venous disorders, lymphedema, congenital vascular malformations, vascular trauma, vascular tumors, visceral vasculature for surgical planning, dialysis access, vascular research/development and modeling, and other vasculopathy. Recommendations are provided in accordance with strength of evidence of publications corresponding to each vascular condition combined with expert opinion from members of the 3DPSIG. Conclusion This consensus appropriateness ratings document, created by the members of the 3DPSIG, provides an updated reference for clinical standards of 3D printing for the care of patients with vascular conditions.

Abstract Deconstructing surgeries into steps and providing instructions with illustrations has been the staple of surgical textbooks for decades. However, it may be difficult for the novice surgeon to interpret 2‐dimensional (2D) illustrations into 3D surgeries. The objective of this study is to create operable models that demonstrate the progression of surgery in 3D and allow for mastering the final steps of the operation first. Mastoidectomy was performed in a stepwise fashion to different end points on 5 identical 3D‐printed temporal bone models to represent 5 major steps of the operation. The drilled models were computed tomography scanned and the subsequent images were used to create 3D model copies of each step. This is the first study to demonstrate that it is possible to create, scan, and copy stepwise, operable, patient‐specific 3D‐printed models, which the trainee can both reference as a 3D dissection guide and can operate on repeatedly and in any order.

Abstract The use of medical 3D printing has expanded dramatically for breast diseases. A writing group composed of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Special Interest Group on 3D Printing (SIG) provides updated appropriateness criteria for breast 3D printing in various clinical scenarios. Evidence-based appropriateness criteria are provided for the following clinical scenarios: benign breast lesions and high-risk breast lesions, breast cancer, breast reconstruction, and breast radiation (treatment planning and radiation delivery).

Abstract Background The rapid expansion and anticipated U.S Food and Drug Administration regulation of 3D printing at the point-of-care necessitates the creation of robust quality management systems. A critical component of any quality management system is a document control system for the organization, tracking, signature collection, and distribution of manufacturing documentation. While off-the-shelf solutions for document control exist, external programs are costly and come with network security concerns. Here, we present our internally developed, cost-effective solution for an electronic document control system for 3D printing at the point-of-care. Methods We created a hybrid document control system by linking two commercially available platforms, Microsoft SharePoint and Adobe Sign, using a customized document approval workflow. Results Our platform meets all Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Part 11 guidances. Conclusion Our hybrid solution for document control provides an affordable system for users to sort, manage, store, edit, and sign documents. The system can serve as a framework for other 3D printing programs to prepare for future U.S Food and Drug Administration regulation, improve the efficiency of 3D printing at the point-of-care, and enhance the quality of work produced by their respective program.

Purpose: To determine whether using 3-dimensional (3D)-printed models in addition to computed tomography (CT) scans to evaluate the primary femoral and tibial tunnels before revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction leads to better agreement with the surgical approach than CT alone. Methods: Fifteen patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction were retrospectively identified. The mean age was 24.3 years, and 73% were female. Using only CT images, 3 board-certified orthopaedists and 5 sports medicine orthopaedic fellows evaluated whether the existing tibial and femoral tunnels were acceptable for the revision surgery. Subsequently, 3D-printed models were made available in addition to the CT scan, and the same questions were asked. Results: For the attending orthopaedic physicians, adding the 3D-printed models did not have a significant impact on the tibial or femoral tunnel agreement compared with the surgical approach. With the fellow physicians, however, using the 3D-printed models with tibial tunnel evaluation led to a higher agreement rate (76%) compared with CT images alone (63%) (P = .050). Furthermore, with the fellow physicians, there was a higher overall agreement when evaluating both the tibial and femoral tunnels with the addition of 3D-printed models (74%) compared with CT alone (65%) (P = .049). Conclusion: Our hypothesis that using 3D-printed models leads to better agreement with the surgical approach was unsupported based on the response of the board-certified orthopaedists. Based on the fellow response, it stands to reason that 3D-printed models may be a useful tool in understanding spatial orientation when planning for revision ACL surgery. Level of Evidence: IV, retrospective case series.