Search

Blood-based biomarkers are valuable diagnostic tools for the management of lung cancer patients. They support not only differential diagnosis and histological subtyping, but are also applied for estimation of prognosis, stratification for specific therapies, monitoring of therapy response, surveillance monitoring and early detection of residual or progressive disease. Early diagnosis of lung cancer in high risk populations (screening) is a promising future indication but poses high medical and economic challenges to marker performance. The five mostly used classical 'tumor markers' show characteristic profiles of sensitivity and specificity for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) like cytokeratin 19-fragments (CYFRA 21-1), carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) and squamous cancer cell antigen (SCCA) as well as for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) like progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE). Combined use and pattern recognition approaches enable highly accurate diagnosis, subtyping and therapy monitoring. For the interpretation of serial measurements on an individual level, markerspecific algorithms have to be developed. So-called companion diagnostics identify druggable molecular changes in signaling pathways of tumor tissue that can be addressed by targeted therapies. New highly sensitive technologies enable the convenient and serial molecular characterization on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood, too. This approach is helpful when biopsies are not available and to overcome tumor molecular heterogeneity and plasticity. As only a portion of patients have such druggable molecular changes, future strategies will imply the combined use of classical and new ctDNA-based biomarkers to optimize the management of lung cancer patients during the course of disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Classic serum tumor markers (human chorionic gonadotropin, α1-fetoprotein and lactate dehydrogenase) have an important role in managing testicular germ cell tumor. Since only 60% of all patients with testicular germ cell tumor have elevations of these markers, there is a need for new biomarkers with greater sensitivity/specificity. miRNAs are deregulated in cancer and could serve as noninvasive serum biomarkers. We explored the role of serum miRNAs as a novel biomarker in patients with testicular germ cell tumor. Materials and Methods Total RNA was isolated from serum. miRNA levels were quantified by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. We assessed the miRNAs miR-302a-3p, 302b-3p, 302c-3p, 367-3p, 371a-3p, 372-3p and 373-3p in a subcohort of 30 patients with testicular germ cell tumor and 18 healthy subjects. Validation was performed in 76 patients treated with inguinal exploration due to suspicion of testicular germ cell tumor, of whom 59 had cancer and 17 had benign disease, and in 84 healthy male subjects. Results Serum miR-367-3p, 371a-3p, 372-3p and 373-3p levels were significantly increased in patients with testicular germ cell tumor compared to healthy individuals and patients with nonmalignant testicular disease. In particular miR-371a-3p allowed for sensitive (84.7%) and specific (99%) identification of patients with testicular germ cell tumor, thus, outperforming human chorionic gonadotropin or α1-fetoprotein testing. Furthermore, miR-367-3p was increased in nonseminoma compared to seminoma cases. Serum miRNA levels were increased in patients with advanced local stage and metastasis. In 9 patients with localized (clinical stage 1A) testicular germ cell tumor serum miR-371a-3p levels decreased postoperatively, indicating tumor specific release. Conclusions miR-371a-3p allows for better identification of testicular germ cell tumor than α1-fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin. It could be helpful for clinically managing testicular germ cell tumor, especially for monitoring surveillance therapy and residual disease after chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: MicroRNAs play an important role in many human malignancies; so far, their expression remains to be studied in upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UUTUC). Materials and Methods: The expression of eleven microRNAs (miR-10a, miR-21, miR-96, miR-135, miR-141, miR-182, miR-200b, miR-205, miR-429, miR-520b, miR-1244) formerly shown to be upregulated in urothelial bladder cancer were studied in corresponding normal and cancerous tissue samples of patients undergoing nephroureterectomy for UUTUC. Upregulated microRNAs were then measured in serum samples of patients with UUTUC and patients with non-malignant urological diseases to evaluate their potential as non-invasive biomarkers for UUTUC. Results: MicroRNA expression allowed differentiation of normal and cancerous tissue: miR-21, miR-96, miR-135, miR-141, miR-182, miR-205, miR-429 and miR-520b were significantly overexpressed. Furthermore, miR-205 was upregulated in poorly differentiated UUTUC. The analysis of circulating RNA in serum demonstrated an increase of miR-141 in patients with UUTUC; receiver operator characteristic analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.726 for miR-141 as a diagnostic biomarker. Furthermore, we observed lower levels of miR-10a and miR-135 in UUTUC patients. Conclusions: MicroRNA expression is altered in UUTUC. The analysis of circulating miR-141 may be useful to identify patients with UUTUC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We performed method comparison for the tumor markers CA 15-3, CA 19-9, and CA 125 measured by luminescent oxygen channeling immunoassay technology on the Dimension Vista 1500 and by classic luminescence technology on the Immulite 2000 XPI. Within-day and total imprecision were determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines using three serum pools at different clinically relevant levels. In addition, parallel measurements on both systems were performed in a total of 738 routine serum samples (133 CA 15-3, 395 CA 19-9, and 210 CA 125). Total imprecision of serum pools for CA 15-3 ranged between 4.6% and 5.9%, for CA 19-9 between 4.4% and 7.8%, and for CA 125 between 3.3% and 4.3%. Marker values determined within the measurement range of both systems correlated well with each other (R = 0.88 for CA 15-3, R = 0.93 for CA 19-9, and R = 0.96 for CA 125). Slopes between the Vista and the Immulite method were 0.96 for CA 125, 0.72 for CA 15-3, and 0.87 for CA 19-9, indicating lower values for CA 15-3 and CA 19-9 when measured by the Vista method. This was particularly obvious for CA 19-9 levels in the lower measuring range of <100 U/mL (R = 0.85; slope 0.73). [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: MicroRNA expression is altered in cancer cells, and microRNAs could serve as diagnostic/prognostic biomarker for cancer patients. Our study was designed to analyze circulating serum microRNAs in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methodology/Principal Findings: We first explored microRNA expression profiles in tissue and serum using TaqMan Low Density Arrays in each six malignant and benign samples: Although 109 microRNAs were circulating at higher levels in cancer patients' serum, we identified only 36 microRNAs with up-regulation in RCC tissue and serum of RCC patients. Seven candidate microRNAs were selected for verification based on the finding of up-regulation in serum and tissue of RCC patients: miR-7-1*, miR-93, miR-106b*, miR-210, miR-320b, miR-1233 and miR-1290 levels in serum of healthy controls (n = 30) and RCC (n = 33) patients were determined using quantitative real-time PCR (TaqMan MicroRNA Assays). miR-1233 was increased in RCC patients, and thus validated in a multicentre cohort of 84 RCC patients and 93 healthy controls using quantitative real-time PCR (sensitivity 77.4%, specificity 37.6%, AUC 0.588). We also studied 13 samples of patients with angiomyolipoma or oncocytoma, whose serum miR-1233 levels were similar to RCC patients. Circulating microRNAs were not correlated with clinical-pathological parameters. Conclusions/Significance: MicroRNA levels are distinctly increased in cancer patients, although only a small subset of circulating microRNAs has a tumor-specific origin. We identify circulating miR-1233 as a potential biomarker for RCC patients. Larger-scaled studies are warranted to fully explore the role of circulating microRNAs in RCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Differential diagnosis of suspicious lung masses is essential for the selection of the appropriate therapy strategy. While non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in early stages and single lung metastases from other cancers mostly are resected by surgery, late stage NSCLC, small cell lung cancers (SCLC) and multiple lung metastases are treated by systemic chemo- and/or radiotherapeutic approaches. In many patients, biopsies for the histopathological subtyping can not be taken due to multimorbidity and instable clinical conditions of the patient or unfavourable localisation of the tumor. In addition, heterogeneity of lung tumors may imply the presence of different malignant cell types in one suspicious lesion. As tumor-related biomarkers in blood reflect the biochemical properties of cancer cells, their release or non-release may be helpful to support the clinical decision making. This review summarizes the current knowledge about the potential and the role of serum-based biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of lung cancer which is also mirrored in the new recommendations of the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prognostic information on the course of cancer disease is highly relevant for the accurate decision of the most effective treatment strategy for an individual patient. In early stage disease, the application of adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy after surgery depends on the risk of the patient to early suffer from tumor recurrence. In advanced stage disease, risk stratification of the patients influences the choice of more aggressive or mild therapy alternatives. Besides tumor related parameters like tumor stage and individual factors, additional information by biomarkers is needed to better characterize patients prognosis in both situations. Although there are plenty of studies dealing on the prognostic relevance of diverse biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the results are quite heterogeneous and sometimes conflicting. Reasons for this situation may be found in the design, the performance, the evaluation and the quality of result reporting of the studies. In this review, we focus on the prerequisites of informative prognostic trials, spot on the general shortcomings of studies published so far, and summarize the results of the prognostic studies available for early and advanced stages of NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The dysregulation of proliferating and apoptotic processes is a common feature in cancerogenesis. Thus, apoptotic products released into blood circulation are suggested as promising markers for the early cancer detection. However though sensitive assays are available, the lack of organ- and tumor-specificity limits the usefulness of most apoptotic parameters for screening purposes. However, they seem to be valuable for the prognosis and the prediction of response to systemic chemo- or radiotherapy in cancer disease. Here, the relevance of diverse circulating apoptotic markers is reviewed for the clinical management of patients with lung cancer. Among those promising markers are ligands and receptors of the FAS-system, members of the intracellular caspase cascade, cleaved apoptosis substrates such as cytokeratines, nucleosomal DNA, and apoptosis modulators like survivin. The review discusses their role for diagnosis, prognosis and therapy monitoring of lung cancer disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the release and amount of circulating biomarkers show considerable variations between individuals, single value determinations are often difficult to be interpreted on their diagnostic or prognostic significance on the individual level. However, changes of the biomarker levels in a specific person during the disease course are quite informative for the estimation of the efficacy of therapy or the early detection of recurrent disease because they consider only intraindividual variations. If methods for marker determination are maintained, preanalytical and analytical standard prerequistits are respected, thresholds for each marker have to be defined which exceeds the normal, intraindividual biological variation. Then continuous biomarker increases may be indicative for disease activity in terms of inefficient therapy response or tumor recurrence while decreasing values often are associated with activity reduction of cancer disease. Here, we review the current knowledge on biomarker kinetics in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and discuss the conditions and pitfalls of their relevance for the estimation efficacy of therapy and the early detection of recurrent disease. Further, we suggest a scenario to reveal the power of the defined biomarker use in future and to include those markers into the individual management of NSCLC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article looks at developments in the study of lung cancer biomarkers. According to the authors, circulating biochemical markers are important and informative tools for managing lung cancer. Biomarkers are considered vital for follow-up investigations because biochemical changes in the blood manifest early the possibility of increasing tumor activity. Information on the release of biochemical markers by various benign and malignant diseases has been limited.

Nucleosomes, complexes of DNA and histone proteins, are released from dying and stressed cells into the blood circulation. Concentrations of circulating nucleosomes in plasma and serum are frequently found to be elevated in various cancers, and also in such acute conditions as stroke, trauma, and sepsis as well as in autoimmune diseases. The first part of this review focuses on the structural and functional properties of nucleosomes, the potential sources of nucleosome release into the circulation, the metabolism of circulating nucleosomes, and their pathophysiological role in disease. It goes on to describe the relevance of circulating nucleosomes in the diagnosis and prognosis of non-malignant conditions such as sepsis, stroke, and autoimmune disease. Finally, it describes the clinical value of nucleosomes in the diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and monitoring of therapy in cancer; in particular, their potential as a new diagnostic tool for the early estimation of response to cytotoxic cancer therapy is emphasized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: The increasing panel of systemic therapies enables the individual management of cancer patients, even in advanced stages. However, diagnostic tools indicating early the efficacy of therapy are still needed. In prospectively collected sera of 161 patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving second-line chemotherapy, the courses of nucleosomes, cytokeratin-19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) were investigated and correlated with therapy response. At high specificity for detection of progressive disease, most sensitive biomarkers were identified and included in a combination model. High levels and insufficient decreases of nucleosomes and CYFRA 21-1 during the first cycle of therapy indicated poor outcome. Combination of nucleosome concentrations at day 8 and CYFRA 21-1 before start of the second cycle enabled the early detection of progressive disease with a sensitivity of 34.4% at 95% specificity (AUC 0.79) prior to imaging techniques. When cutoffs were fixed at the 90th percentile of responding patients, the combination model achieved sensitivities of 19% at 100% specificity and of 52% at 88% specificity. Thus, nucleosomes and CYFRA 21-1 showed to be valuable for the individual management of patients with recurrent NSCLC. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Nucleosomes, complexes of DNA and histone proteins, are released during cell death into the blood circulation. Elevated serum and plasma levels have been found in various forms of cancer, but also in autoimmune diseases and acute situations such as stroke, trauma, and during sepsis. Here, the clinical relevance of circulating nucleosomes for diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and therapeutic monitoring of cancer is reviewed. Several studies have shown that levels of nucleosomes are significantly higher in serum and plasma of cancer patients in comparison to healthy controls. However, because of elevations of nucleosome levels in patients with benign diseases relevant for differential diagnosis, they are not suitable for cancer diagnosis. Concerning tumor staging, nucleosome levels correlate with tumor stage and presence of metastases in gastrointestinal cancer, but not in other tumor types. Prognostic value of circulating nucleosomes is found in lung cancer in univariate analyses, but not in multivariate analyses. Circulating nucleosomes are most informative for the monitoring of cytotoxic therapy. Strongly decreasing levels are mainly found in patients with remission of disease, whereas constantly high or increasing values are associated with progressive disease during chemo- and radiotherapy. In addition, therapy outcome is already indicated by the nucleosomal course during the first week of chemo- and radiotherapy in patients with lung, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer as well as in hematologic malignancies. Despite their non-tumor-specificity, kinetics of nucleosomes are valuable markers for the early estimation of therapeutic efficacy and may be helpful to adapting early cancer therapy in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to test the diagnostic utility of the DNA integrity index for detection of cancer. Matched serum and plasma samples of 42 patients with various forms of cancer and 17 patients with corresponding benign diseases were analyzed. DNA was isolated from 1 mL serum and plasma using the MagNA Pure LC system. Cell-free DNA was quantified by real-time PCR using the reference gene of the LightCycler t(14;18) kit. Subsequently, the DNA integrity index was calculated as the ratio in relative abundance of 347-bp versus 137-bp PCR products. We found that DNA concentrations were not different in plasma (median: 4.5 ng/mL) and serum (67.1 ng/mL) of patients with benign diseases when compared with values in plasma (5.1 ng/mL) and serum (65.4 ng/mL) of cancer patients. Similarly, the DNA integrity index in plasma (0.38), and serum of patients with benign diseases (0.29) was comparable to values in plasma (0.33) and serum (0.37) of cancer patients. Diagnostic sensitivity of DNA (AUC 0.53) and DNA integrity (AUC 0.45) was poor in plasma, and was increased only slightly by the combination of both (AUC 0.57). In serum, sensitivity of DNA (AUC 0.52) and DNA integrity (AUC 0.64) was higher and was further improved by the combination of both (AUC 0.72) reaching a sensitivity of 30% at 100% specificity. In conclusion, we could not confirm a high diagnostic utility of the DNA integrity index. However, a combination with other markers such as DNA may enhance sensitivity for cancer detection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Facing an era of promising new antitumor therapies, predictors of therapy response are needed for the individual management of treatment. In sera collected prospectively from 311 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy, changes in nucleosomal DNA fragments, cytokeratin-19 fragments (CYFRA 21–1), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) were investigated and correlated with therapy response. In univariate analysis, high levels, slower and incomplete decline in nucleosomal DNA, CYFRA 21–1, and CEA predicted poor outcome. DNA concentrations at day 8 of the first therapeutic cycle and CYFRA 21–1 before start of the second cycle were identified as best predictive variables. In multivariate analysis, they predicted progression with a specificity of 100% in 29% of the cases earlier than imaging techniques. Thus, nucleosomal DNA and CYFRA 21–1 specifically identify a subgroup of patients with insufficient therapy response at the early treatment phase and showed to be valuable for disease management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The inadequate response of immune cells to circulating apoptotic products, such as nucleosomal DNA fragments, is assumed to be a potent stimulus for the production of autoantibodies during the pathogenesis and progression of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Here, we analyzed the levels of circulating nucleosomes, caspases, and C-reactive protein in sera of 244 individuals with various autoimmune diseases (155 with autoimmune hepatic disorders, 25 with ANCA-associated vasculitis, and 64 with various connective tissue diseases), and 32 healthy controls. Nucleosomes and caspase activities were significantly elevated in sera of patients with hepatic autoimmune diseases, connective tissue diseases, and particularly in ANCA-associated vasculitis when compared with healthy individuals. Nucleosomes showed a correlation with caspases, and caspases with C-reactive protein, but nucleosomes did not correlate with C-reactive protein. Serum levels of the apoptotic products, nucleosomes, and caspases are increased in various autoimmune diseases but may not be solely responsible for antinucleosome antibody production in SLE patients. It remains to be clarified whether qualitative changes in nucleosomes are linked with pathogenesis and disease progression in SLE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nucleosomes are cell death products that are elevated in serum of patients with diseases that are associated with massive cell destruction. We investigated the kinetics of circulating nucleosomes after cerebral stroke and their correlation with the clinical status. Methods: In total, we analyzed nucleosomes by ELISA in sera of 63 patients with early stroke daily during the first week after onset. For correlation with the clinical pathology, patients were grouped into those with medium to slight functional impairment (Barthel Index BI ≥50) and those with severe functional impairment (BI <50). Results: Patients with BI ≥50 showed a continuous increase in nucleosomes until day 5 (median: 523 arbitrary units, AU) followed by a slow decline. In contrast, patients with BI <50 showed a steeper initial increase reaching a maximum already on day 3 (869 AU). Both, days after stroke (p < 0.001) and BI (p < 0.001), had a significant influence on nucleosome concentrations, respectively. Consistently, patients with BI <50 had a significantly larger area under the curve (AUC/day) of nucleosome values during the first week after stroke (800 AU) than patients with BI ≥50 (497 AU; p = 0.031). Concerning the infarction volume, nucleosomes showed significant correlations for the concentrations on day 3 (r = 0.43; p = 0.001) and for the area under the curve (r = 0.34; p = 0.016). Conclusion: Even if nucleosomes are nonspecific cell death markers, their release into serum after cerebral stroke correlates with the gross functional status as well as with the infarction volume and can be considered as biochemical correlative to the severity of stroke. Copyright © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nucleosomes appear spontaneously in elevated concentrations in the serum of patients with malignant diseases as well as during chemo- and radiotherapy. We analyzed whether their kinetics show typical characteristics during radiochemotherapy and enable an early estimation of therapy efficacy. We used the Cell Death Detection Elisaplus (Roche Diagnostics) and investigated the course of nucleosomes in the serum of 32 patients with a local stage of pancreatic cancer who were treated with radiochemotherapy for several weeks. Ten of them received postsurgical therapy, 21 received primary therapy and 1 received therapy for local relapse. Blood was taken before the beginning of therapy, daily during the first week, once weekly during the following weeks and at the end of radiochemotherapy. The response to therapy was defined according to the kinetics of CA 19-9: a decrease of CA 19-9 ≥50% after radiochemotherapy was considered as ‘remission’; an increase of ≥100% (which was confirmed by two following values) was defined as ‘progression’. Patients with ‘stable disease’ ranged intermediately. Most of the examined patients showed a decrease of the concentration of nucleosomes within 6 h after the first dose of radiation. Afterwards, nucleosome levels increased rapidly, reaching their maximum during the following days. Patients receiving postsurgery, primary or relapse therapies did not show significant differences in nucleosome values during the time of treatment. Single nucleosome values, measured at 6, 24 and 48 h after the application of therapy, could not discriminate significantly between patients with no progression and those with progression of disease. However, the area under the curve of the first 3 days, which integrated all variables of the initial therapeutic phase, showed a significant correlation with the progression-free interval (p = 0.008). Our results indicate that the area under the curve of nucleosomes during the initial phase of radiochemotherapy could be valuable for the early prediction of the progression-free interval. Copyright © 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An editorial about the challenges in the detection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is presented. The authors addressed the prevalence of lung cancer worldwide. They discussed the involvement of circulating biomarkers in the management of lung cancer. They explained the difference between small and non-small cell lung cancer.

Abstract: Extracellular nucleic acids are present in plasma, serum, and other body fluids and their analysis has gained increasing attention during recent years. Because of the small quantity and highly fragmented nature of cell-free DNA in plasma and serum, a fast, efficient, and reliable isolation method is still a problem and so far there is no agreement on a standardized method. We used spin columns from commercial suppliers (QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit from Qiagen; NucleoSpin Kit from Macherey-Nagel; MagNA Pure isolation system from Roche Diagnostics) to isolate DNA from 44 plasma samples in parallel at laboratories in Berlin and Munich. DNA in all samples was quantified by real-time PCR on a LightCycler 480 using three different targets (GAPDH, ß-globin, ERV). The quantities of cell-free DNA for the different isolation methods and genes varied between medians of 1.6ng/mL and 28.1ng/mL. This considerable variation of absolute DNA values was mainly caused by the use of different isolation methods (p<0.0001). Comparable results were achieved by the use of the genes GAPDH and ERV while higher values were obtained by use of ß-globin. The laboratory site had only minor influence on DNA yield when manual extraction methods were used. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]