1. Facial esthetics and subjective impairment assessed after maxillomandibular advancement surgery for patients with obstructive sleep apnea
- Author
-
Dan M.J. Milstein, Jan de Lange, Ruben C. Apperloo, Maurits H. T. de Ruiter, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Maxillofacial Surgery (AMC), Oral Medicine, Oral Kinesiology, Maxillofacial Surgery (AMC + VUmc), Graduate School, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and Other Research
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Visual analogue scale ,medicine.medical_treatment ,OSA ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Quality of life ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,medicine ,General Dentistry ,obstructive sleep apnea ,Maxillomandibular advancement surgery ,business.industry ,food and beverages ,Maxillomandibular advancement ,030206 dentistry ,medicine.disease ,respiratory tract diseases ,Surgery ,Obstructive sleep apnea ,Otorhinolaryngology ,VAS ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Objective: To assess facial esthetics and quality of life (QoL) as measure of success or failure after maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) surgery for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: Visual analog scales (VAS) on facial esthetics and QoL survey, including EQ-5D3L, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) were collected. Outcomes were analyzed for surgical-success/failure after MMA. Results: Forty-one patients returned completed surveys (response: 66%). Mean VAS on facial esthetics was 57 ± 22 mm preoperative and 51 ± 24 mm postoperative (p = 0.217). When MMA was considered a surgical-failure, VAS was significantly more negative (40 ± 22 mm; p = 0.026). EQ-5D-3L showed an overall mean score of 73.2 ± 15.7, ESS was 6.3 ± 5.4, and FOSQ was 16.0 ± 3.3. Conclusion: No significant alteration of facial esthetics were reported after MMA; however, lower QoL was associated with surgical-failure; whereas, in surgical-success, QoL were higher.
- Published
- 2023