Search

This study develops a differential variable speed limit (DVSL) which assigns different speed limits for car and truck, and varies speed limits based on traffic conditions. The proposed DVSL algorithm changes speed limits in real time based on truck percentage and occupancy immediately upstream of the ramp and the average speed of the control road sections upstream of the ramp. DVSL algorithm also considers spatial coordination of speeds, which gradually changes the speed limits in successive road sections upstreamof the ramp when the severe congestion occurs. The study tested the impacts of DVSL and three other speed limit strategies on delay and safety for a section of the Gardiner Expressway in Toronto, Canada using the VISSIM traffic simulation model. The other strategies are 1) uniform speed limit (USL), 2) differential speed limit for car and truck (DSL), and 3) USL & DSL (U&D) e i.e., USL at low truck percentage and DSL at high truck percentage. It was found that DVSL showed the lowest delays for both car and truck among the four strategies. This is mainly because DVSL increased the spacing between vehicles in the right lane upstream of the on-ramp and facilitated vehicles' merging into the mainline freeway. It was also found that DVSL showed the lowest likelihood of rear-end crash between the lead and following vehicles among the four strategies. This study demonstrates that the proposed DVSL algorithm can better control car and truck speeds to reduce delay and improve safety of car-truck mixed traffic flow on freeways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Microscopic traffic simulation models require the calibration of car-following (or vehicle-following) models. The parameters of vehicle-following models control individual driver’s spacing, time gap, speed variation and acceleration during different driving conditions. In recent studies, these parameters have been determined for different vehicle classes separately since heavy vehicles generally keep longer spacing and time gap than light vehicles. These parameters have been commonly estimated based on the observed macroscopic traffic flow data such as average volume and speed. However, these data cannot reflect actual vehicle-following behavior of individual vehicles. Also, the effect of the lead vehicle class on the following vehicle’s behavior has been neglected in the parameter estimation. Thus, this study estimates the driving behavior parameters for cars and heavy vehicles in the Wiedemann 99 vehicle-following model. For the estimation, 2169 vehicle trajectories were obtained from a 640-m segment of US-101 in Los Angeles, California during the morning peak hours. Separate parameters were estimated for three vehicle classes (cars, heavy vehicles, and motorcycles) and three vehicle-following cases (car following car, car following heavy vehicle, and heavy vehicle following car). From the comparison of the driving behavior parameters between cars and heavy vehicles, it was found that heavy vehicles keep longer spacing and time gap with the lead vehicle, are less sensitive to the lead car behavior, and apply smaller acceleration when they start from stationary position compared to cars. It was also found that the parameters significantly varied across different vehicle pairs even for the same vehicle class and the same vehicle-following case. The estimated parameters were also validated as the VISSIM simulation with the estimated parameters better reflected the observed cumulative average speed and acceleration distributions than the simulation with the default parameters. The results indicate that differences in the parameters among different vehicle-following cases and the variability of parameters for different vehicle pairs must be considered in the fixed parameters for each vehicle class currently used in the Wiedemann’s model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigates the effects of the traffic flow parameters related to individual drivers' lane-changing and car-following behavior on the occurrence of sideswipe and rear-end crashes on freeways. A total of 184 sideswipe and 605 rear-end crashes on I-4 freeway in Orlando, Florida, with the loop detector data were used for the analysis. A set of the Bayesian logistic regression models were developed to estimate the likelihood of crashes in a specific lane compared to the adjacent lanes using the 5 min average and lane-by-lane traffic flow parameters. The analysis results showed that the significant traffic flow parameters affecting crash occurrence in a specific lane are distinctively different between sideswipe and rear-end crashes. The flow-related variables were significant in the sideswipe crash models whereas the speed-related variables were significant in the rear-end crash models. The results suggest that the lane-by-lane traffic flow parameters are considered as surrogate measures of lane-changing and car-following behavior that are associated with the occurrence of sideswipe and rear-end crashes. These parameters can potentially be used for real-time monitoring of the likelihood of crash occurrence by lane on instrumented freeways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: This paper examines automated control strategies of variable speed limits that aim at reducing crash potential on instrumented freeways. A real-time crash prediction model was developed to estimate crash potential based on short-term variation of traffic flow characteristics. A microscopic traffic simulation model was used to realistically simulate changes in traffic conditions as an effect of variable speed limits and combined with the crash prediction model for the evaluation of control logics. Within this integrated evaluation framework, the study investigated the effect of strategy control factors on the crash potential reduction and total travel time. The study results indicated that variable speed limits could reduce crash potential by 5–17%, by temporarily reducing speed limits during risky traffic conditions when crash potential exceeded the pre-specified threshold. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: This study presents a real-time crash prediction model and uses this model to investigate the effect of the local traffic-responsive ramp metering strategy on freeway safety. Safety benefits of ramp metering are quantified in terms of the reduced crash potential estimated by the real-time crash prediction model. Driver responses to ramp metering and the consequent traffic flow changes were observed using a microscopic traffic simulation model and crash potential was estimated for a 14.8km section of I-880 in Hayward, California and a hypothetical isolated on-ramp network. The results showed that ramp metering reduced crash potential by 5–37% compared to the no-control case. It was found that safety benefits of local ramp metering strategy were only restricted to the freeway sections in the vicinity of the ramp, and were highly dependent on the existing traffic conditions and the spatial extent over which the evaluation was conducted. The results provide some insight into how a local ramp metering strategy can be modified to improve safety (by reducing total crash potential) on longer stretch of freeways over a wide range of traffic conditions. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This paper makes use of a probabilistic model that predicts the likelihood of crashes (crash potential) on freeways on the basis of traffic flow conditions, in real-time crash prevention. The model was developed using incident logs and loop detector data collected over a 13-month period on the Gardiner Expressway in Toronto. Previous work suggested that an increase in levels of traffic turbulence generally yields high crash potential. Traffic turbulence was defined in terms of a series of crash precursors that represent traffic conditions that were present prior to crash occurrence. To apply the model in crash prevention, the link needs to be established between crash potential and real-time safety intervention. The objective of this paper is to explore this link for different thresholds of crash potential. The paper discusses the guidelines for evaluating the safety benefit of one crash prevention strategy (variable speed limits) and suggests the risk-based evaluation framework for real-time traffic control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]