Search

Few studies have investigated the effects of abutment screw diameter in the stress of dental implants and alveolar bones under occlusal forces. In this study, we investigated how variations in implant diameter, abutment screw diameter, and bone condition affect stresses in the abutment screw, implant, and surrounding bone. Three-dimensional finite element (FE) models were fabricated for dental implants with external hex-type abutments measuring 4 and 5 mm in diameter. The models also included abutment screws measuring 2.0 and 2.5 mm in diameter. Each implant model was integrated with the mandibular bone comprising the cortical bone and four types of cancellous bone. In total, 12 finite element models were generated, subjected to three different occlusal forces, and analyzed using FE software to investigate the stress distribution of dental implant and alveolar bone. Wider implants demonstrated lower stresses in implant and bone compared with standard-diameter implants. The quality of cancellous bone has a minimal impact on the stress values of the implant, abutment screw, and cortical bone. Regardless of occlusal arrangement or quality of cancellous bone, a consistent pattern emerged: larger abutment screw diameters led to increased stress levels on the screws, while the stress levels in both cortical and cancellous bone showed comparatively minor fluctuations. Wider implants tend to have better stress distribution than standard-diameter implants. The potential advantage of augmenting the abutment screw diameter is unfavorable. It may result in elevated stresses in the implant system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/purpose: Impact of the implant shape on the biomechanical performance of all-on-four treatment of dental implant is still unclear. This study evaluated the all-on-four treatment with four osseointegrated implants in terms of the biomechanical effects of implant design and loading position on the implant and surrounding bone by using both in vitro strain gauge tests and three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) analyses.Methods: Both in vitro and 3D FE models were constructed with placing NobelSpeedy and NobelActive implants as well as a titanium framework in an edentulous jawbone based on the concept of all-on-four treatment. Three types of loads were applied: at the central incisor area (loading position 1) and at the molar regions with (loading position 2) and without (loading position 3) the denture cantilever. For the in vitro tests, the principal bone strains were recorded by rosette strain gauges and statistically evaluated using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. The 3D FE simulations analyzed the peak von-Mises stresses in the implant and surrounding cortical bone.Results: The peak stress and strain in the surrounding bone were typically 36-62% (3D FE analysis) and 47-57% (in vitro test) (p < 0.001)higher for loading position 3 than for loading positions 1 and 2. Between those two implant designs, the bone strains and bone stresses did not differ significantly.Conclusion: For all-on-four treatment with four osseointegrated dental implants, altering the implant design does not appear to affect the biomechanical performance of the entire treatment, especially in terms of the stresses and strains in the surrounding bone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/purpose: Small-diameter dental implants are associated with a higher risk of implant failure. This study used both three-dimensional finite-element (FE) simulations and in-vitro experimental tests to analyze the stresses and strains in both the implant and the surrounding bone when using one-piece (NobelDirect) and two-piece (NobelReplace) small-diameter implants, with the aim of understanding the underlying biomechanical mechanisms.Methods: Six experimental artificial jawbone models and two FE models were prepared for one-piece and two-piece 3.5-mm diameter implants. Rosette strain gauges were used for in-vitro tests, with peak values of the principal bone strain recorded with a data acquisition system. Implant stability as quantified by Periotest values (PTV) were also recorded for both types of implants. Experimental data were analyzed statistically using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. In FE simulations, the peak value and distribution of von-Mises stresses in the implant and bone were selected for evaluation.Results: In in-vitro tests, the peak bone strain was 42% lower for two-piece implants than for one-piece implants. The PTV was slightly lower for one-piece implants (PTV = -6) than for two-piece implants (PTV = -5). In FE simulations, the stresses in the bone and implant were about 23% higher and 12% lower, respectively, for one-piece implants than those for two-piece implants.Conclusion: Due to the higher peri-implant bone stresses and strains, one-piece implants (NobelDirect) might be not suitable for use as small-diameter implants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: This study attempted to estimate the elastic modulus of cortical specimens directly from the computed tomography (CT) number (CT). Cubic specimens of fresh bovine femora were tested under compressive loading. The corresponding three-dimensional mesh models of these specimens were established with the aid of CT images. The elastic modulus of each element was determined using the following transfer formula: E=A×(CT)B. The A and B were determined by matching the simulation results with the experimental force–displacement curves. An optimization approach was used to match the entire specimen sets between simulations and experiments. The results indicated that the elastic modulus of cortical bone can be effectively estimated using a power relationship (E=1.26×10−3×(CT)1.93) directly from the CT number. This procedure eliminates the need to determine the bone density, and therefore reduces the computational time required to define mechanical properties in finite element methods. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Three-dimensional finite element (FE) models of splinted prosthetic crowns were studied and stress analyses were evaluated with different types of implant support, including standard, wide or two implant(s) for partial, posterior edentulous restorations. The FE models were constructed based on a cadaver mandible containing the 2nd premolar and the 1st molar. The crowns of these two teeth were modeled as connected and disconnected to mimic the splinted and non-splinted designs, respectively. One standard implant was placed at the premolar region, while three types of implant support, one at a time (the standard implant, wide implant and two implants), were used to support the molar crown. A 100 N oblique load was applied to the buccal cusp on each crown. The FE simulation was validated experimentally via strain gauge measurement. The experimental data were well correlated with the FE predictions ( r2=0.97). When compared with the standard implant used in the molar area, the wide implant and two implants reduced the peak stress in crestal bone by 29–37% for both splinted and non-splinted cases. Inserting the standard implant into both the premolar and molar area, the bone stresses were identical for splinted and non-splinted designs. However, splinting the adjacent crowns has shown to decrease the bone stresses at the premolar region by 25%, while the wide implant or two implants were placed at the molar region. The biomechanical advantages of using the wide implant or two implants are almost identical. The benefit of load sharing by the splinted crowns is notable only when the implants on the premolar and molar regions have different supporting ability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]