1. Paper versus Electronic Sources for Law Review Cite Checking: Should Paper Be the Gold Standard?
- Author
-
Rumsey, Mary and Schwartz, April
- Subjects
ELECTRONIC information resources ,LAW periodicals ,DOCUMENT imaging systems ,LIBRARY surveys ,ANNOTATIONS & citations (Law) ,ELECTRONIC reference sources - Abstract
The article presents information on a survey which finds that despite the convenience of electronic versions, law review editors continue to strongly prefer paper sources. This preference conflicts with libraries' need to cancel duplicate print subscriptions to reporters and law reviews, and to avoid large interlibrary loan costs. In this article, the authors report the results of this survey of law review practice and suggest that image-based documents should lead to changes in law review policy. In contrast to scholarly publications in other disciplines, most law journals get edited by students. As part of that editing, students hunt down a copy of each System of Citation. To the extent that any citation guide dictates whether journal staffers check citations in paper rather than electronic sources, then the Bluebook reigns. Surprisingly, editors split on whether the Bluebook elevates paper sources over electronic ones. With the advent of image-based documents, the geography of the legal information landscape has changed radically. In 2002, owner of Westlaw introduced PDF versions of some cases. This "old wine in new bottles" gives researchers the option of seeing cases exactly as they appear in West reporters, i.e., as they appear on paper.
- Published
- 2005