Search

Background: The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy, safety, and pain level of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration via a subcutaneous catheter compared with direct injection in children with cancer. Method: This was a pilot randomized controlled trial of standard G-CSF administration versus subcutaneous catheter administration. Children 2–15 years of age who were beginning G-CSF after their first chemotherapy cycle and anticipated to receive G-CSF following the next three cycles of chemotherapy were eligible. Efficacy, safety, and pain were as outcomes of the study. Results: Twenty-nine children with cancer (median age 12 years) were enrolled in the study (16 children in the subcutaneous catheter group and 13 children in the direct injection group). During Cycle 2, the median number of days to reach absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 500/mm3 was greater among those in the subcutaneous catheter group (12 vs. 10; p =.02). In Cycle 3, however, the subcutaneous catheter group received fewer doses of G-CSF (8 vs. 12; p =.004). No complications related to subcutaneous catheter use were observed. No differences in the visual analog scale pain score were observed between groups in Cycles 1 to 3; however, in Cycle 4, children in the subcutaneous catheter group had lower median pain scores than those in the direct subcutaneous injection group (Mdn = 0, [IQR] = 0–2 vs. Mdn = 1, IQR = 0–6; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Results demonstrated administering G-CSF via a subcutaneous catheter enables ANC to recover with no pain or complications associated with its use. Thus, oncology teams may consider this administration method to be used in children with cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the impact of a structured educational programme for caregivers of children with cancer on their level of knowledge about the disease and patient's clinical outcome. Methods: This prospective, non‐randomised, experimental study included caregivers of recently diagnosed children at two hospitals in Chile. Caregivers whose children were treated at the first centre were the structured education programme group (EPG), while the second hospital provided the standard care (SCG). We evaluated caregivers' level of knowledge on days 1, 10 and 90 as well as the children's clinical outcomes over 1 year of treatment. Results: A total of 102 caregivers were enrolled between 2014 and 2015. Only the EPG showed a significant increase in knowledge between days 1 and 90. The rate of central venous catheter infections was significantly lower in the EPG versus SCG (7% versus 26%; p =.01). The risk ratio was 0.35 (95% CI = 0.13–0.94), and a log‐rank test showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p =.018). There were also fewer Emergency Department visits in the EPG for fever episodes. Conclusion: Providing a structured education to caregivers increased their level of knowledge and improved the clinical outcome of their children during the first year of treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]