Search

The Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) is commonly conducted in a simulated setting. Although the WST can be done in the community setting, its usefulness in this setting has not been systematically evaluated. The purpose of this study was to compare the WST in the simulated versus community settings, and to explore participants' perceptions of performing in each environment. For this mixed-methods study, we studied 20 motorized mobility scooter users who had used their devices for ≥ 3 months. Each participant completed the WST Version 4.3 twice in random order – once in a simulated setting and once in their community within a two-week period. Semi-structured interviews were conducted after completion of the WST in both environments. A self-report version of the WST (WST-Q) was also completed that measured perceived capacity, frequency of skill performance, and confidence. The mean (SD) total WST score in the simulated setting was 88.9% (8.6) and 92.7% (7.8) in the community setting. The two WST scores were moderately correlated (r = 0.306, p = 0.190). Community-setting WST scores were moderately correlated with WST-Q confidence scores. Simulated-setting scores were moderately correlated with WST-Q frequency scores. Although most participants preferred performing the WST in their communities due to convenience and familiarity, they perceived the simulated setting to be reflective of their community settings. Despite challenges, community-based testing may provide a better reflection of everyday performance for scooter users than testing in a simulated environment. Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) scores obtained from conducting the assessment in the community may be different from those obtained from conducting the assessment in a simulated setting. Since the WST conducted in the community likely provides different information from the WST conducted in the lab, clinicians should carefully consider which environment to access wheelchair skills in. In an urban, community setting, all WST skills were able to be found within a one block radius of participants' homes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To test the hypothesis that a Remote-Learning Course improves the subjective wheelchair-skills performance and confidence of wheelchair service providers, and to determine the participants' views on the Course. This was an observational cohort study, with pre-post comparisons. To meet the objectives of the six-week Course, the curriculum included self-study and weekly one-hour remote meetings. Participants submitted their Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q) (Version 5.3.1) "performance" and "confidence" scores before and after the Course. Participants also completed a Course Evaluation Form after the Course. The 121 participants were almost all from the rehabilitation professions, with a median of 6 years of experience. The mean (SD) WST-Q performance scores rose from 53.4% (17.8) pre-Course to 69.2% (13.8) post-Course, a 29.6% relative improvement (p < 0.0001). The mean (SD) WST-Q confidence scores rose from 53.5% (17.9) to 69.5% (14.3), a 29.9% relative improvement (p < 0.0001). Correlations between performance and confidence were highly significant (p < 0.0001). The Course Evaluation indicated that most participants found the Course useful, relevant, understandable, enjoyable, "just right" in duration, and most stated that they would recommend the Course to others. Although there is room for improvement, a Remote-Learning Course improves the subjective wheelchair-skills performance and confidence scores of wheelchair service providers by almost 30%, and participants were generally positive about the Course. A Remote-Learning Course improves the subjective wheelchair-skills performance and confidence scores of wheelchair service providers by almost 30%. Participants were generally positive about the Course. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective(s): Life and limb threatening vascular emergencies often present to rural hospitals where only general surgery services are available. It is known that Australian rural general surgical centres encounter 10–20 emergency vascular surgery procedures annually. This study aimed to assess rural general surgeons' confidence managing emergent vascular procedures. Setting, Participants and Design: A survey was distributed to Australian rural general surgeons to determine their confidence (Yes/No) in performing emergent vascular procedures including limb revascularisation, revising arterio‐venous (AV) fistulas, open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), superior mesenteric artery (SMA)/coeliac embolectomy, limb embolectomy, vascular access catheter insertion and limb amputation (digit, forefoot, below knee and above knee). Confidence level was compared with surgeon demographics and training. Variables were compared using univariate logistic regression. Results: Sixteen per cent (67/410) of all Australian rural general surgeons responded to the survey. Increased age, years since fellowship and training prior to 1995 (when separation of Australian vascular and general surgery occurred) were associated with greater confidence in limb revascularisation, revising AV fistulas, open repair of ruptured AAA, SMA/coeliac embolectomy, and limb embolectomy (p < 0.05). Surgeons who completed >6 months of vascular surgery training were more comfortable with SMA/coeliac embolectomy (49% vs. 17%, p = 0.01) and limb embolectomy (59% vs. 28%, p = 0.02). Confidence in performing limb amputation was similar across surgeon demographics and training (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Recently graduated rural general surgeons do not feel confident in managing vascular emergencies. Additional vascular surgery training should be considered as part of general surgical training and rural general surgical fellowships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Although both wheelchair skills and fitness are important and probably inter-related, the extent and nature of the relationship between them are not well understood. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that there are significant relationships between wheelchair skills scores and the peak exercise capacity of community-dwelling manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Materials and methods: We studied 26 participants, recording Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire scores and peak power output from graded aerobic wheelchair exercise testing on a motorized treadmill. Results: The median Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire capacity, confidence, and performance scores were 83.3%, 81.5%, and 76.7% and the median peak power output was 58.2 W. On regression analysis, there were significant relationships between the total Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire capacity, confidence, and performance scores and peak power output (R2 0.270–0.709, odds ratios 1.043–1.150, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Significant relationships exist between the wheelchair skills capacity, confidence, and performance scores and the peak exercise capacity of community-dwelling manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. These findings suggest that both wheelchair skills training and exercise training may be useful during the rehabilitation of people with spinal cord injury. Moderate positive relationships exist between wheelchair skills capacity and the peak exercise capacity of community-dwelling manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Moderate positive relationships exist between wheelchair skills confidence and the peak exercise capacity of community-dwelling manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Although further research is needed, these findings suggest that clinicians should address both wheelchair skills training and exercise training during the rehabilitation of people with spinal cord injury and not assume that either alone is sufficient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency, test–retest reliability and responsiveness of the Self-Efficacy in Assessing, Training and Spotting manual wheelchair skills (SEATS-M) and Self-Efficacy in Assessing, Training and Spotting power wheelchair skills (SEATS-P). Methods: A 2-week test–retest design was used with a convenience sample of occupational and physical therapists who worked at a provincial rehabilitation centre (inpatient and outpatient services). Sixteen participants completed the SEATS-M and 18 participants completed the SEATS-P. Results: For the SEATS-M assessment, training, spotting and documentation sections, Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.90 to 0.97, the 2-week intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC1,1) ranged from 0.81 to 0.95, the standard error of measurements (SEM) ranged from 5.06 to 8.70 and the smallest real differences (SRD) ranged from 6.24 to 8.18. For the SEATS-P assessment, training, spotting and documentation sections, Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.83 to 0.92, the ICCs ranged from 0.72 to 0.86, the SEMs ranged from 4.54 to 8.91 and the SRDs ranged from 5.90 to 8.27. Conclusions: There is preliminary evidence that both the SEATS-M and the SEATS-P have high internal consistency, good test–retest reliability and support for responsiveness. These tools can be used in evaluating clinician self-efficacy with assessing, training, spotting and documenting wheelchair skills included on the Wheelchair Skills Test. There is preliminary evidence that the SEATS-M and SEATS-P are reliable and responsive outcome measures that can be used to evaluate the self-efficacy of clinicians to administer the Wheelchair Skills Program. Measurement of clinicians' self-efficacy in this area of practice may enable an enhanced understanding of the areas in which clinicians lack self-efficacy, thereby informing the development of improved knowledge translation interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose:To investigate the score distribution, reliability, and validity of the objective Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) for scooter users. Method:A study using a test–retest design was conducted with 20 people who had mobility limitations that prevented them from ambulating more than one city block without a mobility aid, and who had owned a scooter for ≥3 months. Objective scooter skills, confidence, and physical accessibility were measured at both time points, while anxiety, depression, visual attention and task switching, functional independence, and visual acuity were measured only at baseline. Results:The mean total WST scores at Time 1 and Time 2 were 86.3% and 87.5%. The WST ICC was 0.889. The WST had a SEM of 2.50 and a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.74. The total WST scores were significantly correlated with total subjective WST-Q scores (r = 0.547,p = 0.013), scooter confidence (r = 0.466,p = 0.038), and were affected by gender (p = 0.005). Conclusion:The WST for scooters has good test–retest reliability and generally varies as anticipated with other measures. Although further study is needed, the WST for scooters appears to have promise for use in research and clinical practice. Implications for RehabilitationIt is important to understand the measurement properties of the tools we use in rehabilitation so the results can be interpreted correctly.As scooter use increases, better measurement of skills is required. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]