Search

Aim: To test the association of alcohol consumption with total and cause‐specific mortality risk. Design Prospective observational multi‐centre population‐based study. Setting: Sixteen cohorts (15 from Europe) in the MOnica Risk, Genetics, Archiving and Monograph (MORGAM) Project. Participants: A total of 142 960 individuals (mean age 50 ± 13 years, 53.9% men). Measurements Average alcohol intake by food frequency questionnaire, total and cause‐specific mortality. Findings In comparison with life‐time abstainers, consumption of alcohol less than 10 g/day was associated with an average 11% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 7–14%] reduction in the risk of total mortality, while intake > 20 g/day was associated with a 13% (95% CI = 7–20%) increase in the risk of total mortality. Comparable findings were observed for cardiovascular (CV) deaths. With regard to cancer, drinking up to 10 g/day was not associated with either mortality risk reduction or increase, while alcohol intake > 20 g/day was associated with a 22% (95% CI = 10–35%) increased risk of mortality. The association of alcohol with fatal outcomes was similar in men and women, differed somewhat between countries and was more apparent in individuals preferring wine, suggesting that benefits may not be due to ethanol but other ingredients. Mediation analysis showed that high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol explained 2.9 and 18.7% of the association between low alcohol intake and total as well as CV mortality, respectively. Conclusions: In comparison with life‐time abstainers, consuming less than one drink per day (nadir at 5 g/day) was associated with a reduced risk of total, cardiovascular and other causes mortality, except cancer. Intake of more than two drinks per day was associated with an increased risk of total, cardiovascular and especially cancer mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To assess the relationship between hemoglobin concentration and cause-specific mortality. Design Cohort study. Setting Data from the government-sponsored Annual Geriatric Health Examination Program. Participants Community-dwelling Taipei citizens aged 65 and older followed up between 2006 and 2010 (N = 77,532). Measurements Mortality was determined by matching participants' medical records with national death files. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between hemoglobin concentration (World Health Organization ( WHO)-defined anemia and 7 hemoglobin concentrations) and cause-specific mortality. Results The mortality risk of WHO-defined anemia increased substantially in both sexes for all-cause and cancer mortalities (men, hazard ratio ( HR) = 1.86, 95% confidence interval ( CI) = 1.71-2.02 for all-cause mortality; HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.69-2.22 for cancer mortality; for women, HR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.43-1.86 for all-cause mortality; HR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.38-2.19 for cancer mortality). Men with hemoglobin concentrations of 15.0 to 15.9 g/ dL and women with hemoglobin concentrations of 13.0 to 13.9 g/ dL had the lowest risks of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality. Risks of all-cause and cancer mortality increased significantly when hemoglobin concentrations were less than 14 g/ dL in men and less than 12 g/ dL in women. Even mild anemia (11.0-11.9 g/ dL) was associated with greater mortality risk. Stratification according to age, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and presence of comorbidities did not lead to any substantial changes. Conclusion Hemoglobin concentrations associated with optimal survival in older adults were identified and additional data provided regarding the relationship between hemoglobin concentrations and cause-specific mortality risks in older adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The lack of health insurance reduces access to care and often results in poorer health outcomes. The present study simultaneously assessed the effects of health insurance on cancer and chronic disease mortality, as well as the inter-relationships with diet, obesity, smoking, and inflammatory biomarkers. We hypothesized that public/no insurance versus private insurance would result in increased cancer/chronic disease mortality due to the increased prevalence of inflammation-related lifestyle factors in the underinsured population.Methods: Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey participants (NHANES III;1988-1994) were prospectively examined to assess the effects of public/no insurance versus private insurance and inflammation-related lifestyle factors on mortality risk from cancer, all causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to assess these relationships.Results: Multivariate regression analyses revealed substantially greater risks of mortality ranging from 35% to 245% for public/no insurance versus private insurance for cancer (HR=1.35; 95% CI=1.09,1.66), all causes (HR=1.54; 95% CI=1.39,1.70), CVD (HR=1.62; 95% CI=1.38,1.90) and diabetes (HR=2.45; 95% CI=1.45,4.14). Elevated CRP, smoking, reduced diet quality and higher BMI were more prevalent in those with public insurance, and were also associated with increased risks of cancer/chronic disease mortality.Discussion: Insurance status was strongly associated with cancer/chronic disease mortality after adjusting for lifestyle factors. The results suggest that inadequate health insurance coverage results in a substantially greater need for preventive strategies that focus on tobacco control, obesity, and improved dietary quality. These efforts should be incorporated into comprehensive insurance coverage programs for all Americans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]