Search

Background: Pulmonary function may decline after induction chemotherapy and predict perioperative complications in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The influence of adjuvant chemotherapy is largely indeterminate. Objective: To assess whether adjuvant chemotherapy alters pulmonary function and impacts on treatment-related adverse events. Methods: In a trial on adjuvant chemotherapy (the TREAT trial), 132 patients with R0-resected NSCLC were randomised to 4 cycles of cisplatin-vinorelbine (CVb, n = 65) or cisplatin-pemetrexed (CPx, n = 67). Pulmonary function tests (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FEV1, forced vital capacity, FVC, total lung capacity, TLC, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, DLCO, and blood gas analyses, BGA) were analysed before and 30 days after the last chemotherapy, and changes were calculated (Δ = mean differences). Results: Overall,FVC increased significantly (Δ +290 ml, n = 76; p < 0.0001), while TLC did not change (Δ +220 ml, n = 41; p = 0.174). For CPx, FEV1 increased significantly (Δ +150 ml, n = 47; p = 0.0017), but not for CVb (Δ +30 ml, n = 30). DLCO decreased only for CVb (-8%, n = 6) but not for CPx (-0.39%, n = 17; p = 0.58). BGA did not change (p = 0.99). In a Cox regression analysis, baseline pulmonary function did not influence treatment failure. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy seems not to result in a decrease of pulmonary function parameters. A significant FVC increase was probably due to ongoing postoperative improvement. Decline of DLCO was noted with CVb but not with CPx. Pulmonary function does not impact on treatment failure. © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although progress could have been achieved in treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), outcome still remains poor. One of the strategies to improve survival currently under investigation is maintenance therapy, e.g. prolongation of treatment duration with the administration of an agent at the end of a defined number of initial chemotherapy cycles. This can consist of molecularly targeted or chemotherapeutic drugs which were already included in the induction therapy or different, potentially noncross-resistant agents. The latter represents the perhaps most promising strategy according to currently available data. Drugs chosen for this form of maintenance should be well tolerated with favorable toxicity profile. In the search for this, pemetrexed has classified as an encouraging agent for maintenance therapy as it can be easily delivered, has a favorable toxicity profile and has already demonstrated significant efficacy in advanced NSCLC. Here we review the current status of maintenance therapy with emphasis on pemetrexed in advanced NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Cytotoxic therapy for lung-cancer patients has only moderately improved during the last decades. Simultaneously, efforts of intensive research to increase our understanding of the molecular basis of lung cancer have been undertaken. The cancer cell has been characterised by several genetic changes that lead to altered cellular functions. In addition, multiple factors of the cancer-cell environment further affect the tumour cell via various receptors and subsequent signaling pathways. The increased knowledge of cellular signaling offers the opportunity to develop novel substances that target specific pathway molecules. In the current review, some of the most essential receptors and signaling pathways involved in lung cancer will be described. In conjunction, examples of novel target-specific agents that have already found their way into clinical trials will be discussed. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We report 5-year efficacy and safety outcomes from CheckMate 9LA in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and exploratory analyses in key patient subgroups. Adults with stage IV/recurrent NSCLC and no sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were randomized to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy (n = 361) or chemotherapy (n = 358). Outcomes were assessed in all randomized patients and subgroups. With 57.3 months' minimum follow-up, patients continued to derive overall survival (OS) benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy over chemotherapy (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62–0.85; 5-year OS rates, 18% vs. 11%), regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (PD-L1 < 1%, 22% vs. 8%; PD-L1 ≥ 1%, 18% vs. 11%), histology (squamous, 18% vs. 7%; non-squamous, 19% vs. 12%), or presence of baseline brain metastases (20% vs. 6%). Five-year duration of response (DOR) rates were 19% versus 8% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, with consistent benefit across subgroups. Patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy due to treatment-related adverse events had a 5-year OS rate of 37%. Five-year progression-free survival and DOR rates in 5-year survivors were 55% versus 38% and 59% versus 46%, respectively. No new safety signals were observed in 5-year survivors, regardless of the number of ipilimumab doses received. This 5-year update supports the long-term, durable OS benefit and improved 5-year survivorship with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy over chemotherapy in patients with mNSCLC, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression or histology. NCT03215706 • NIVO + IPI + chemo provided long-term, durable clinical benefit in metastatic NSCLC. • Magnitude of benefit was higher in PD-L1 < 1% or squamous histology subgroups. • NIVO + IPI + chemo improved efficacy outcomes in patients with brain metastases. • Treatment discontinuation due to TRAEs had no negative impact on efficacy. • In 5-y survivors, safety profile was consistent regardless of the no. of IPI doses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]