1. Validation of the Australian version of the Chronic Kidney Disease Self‐Management instrument.
- Author
-
Wembenyui, Colette, Douglas, Clint, and Bonner, Ann
- Subjects
CHRONIC kidney failure ,GLOMERULAR filtration rate ,BLOOD pressure ,STATISTICAL reliability ,RESEARCH evaluation ,SOCIAL support ,PROBLEM solving ,ACQUISITION of data methodology ,RESEARCH methodology evaluation ,SELF-management (Psychology) ,RESEARCH methodology ,CROSS-sectional method ,HEALTH outcome assessment ,MULTITRAIT multimethod techniques ,HEALTH literacy ,SELF-efficacy ,PRIMARY health care ,FACTOR analysis ,INTRACLASS correlation ,HEALTH behavior ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,MEDICAL records ,DRUGS ,SCALE analysis (Psychology) ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,STATISTICAL correlation ,PATIENT compliance ,DATA analysis software ,BEHAVIOR modification - Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the modified Chronic Kidney Disease Self‐Management instrument in an English‐speaking population. Background: There is growing evidence that self‐management behaviours can improve outcomes for people with chronic kidney disease. However, there are few suitable instruments available. Design The study was cross sectional, with a test–retest protocol. Method: Adults with chronic kidney disease attending a primary health care between June and December 2015 completed the Chronic Kidney Disease Self‐Management instrument. Construct validity was determined using exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency and test–retest reliability using Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation. For convergent validity, the relationships between knowledge, self‐efficacy and self‐management were investigated. Results: The Australian version of the Chronic Kidney Disease Self‐Management instrument has 17 items grouped into four factors: self‐integration, seeking social support, adherence to lifestyle modification and problem solving. The instrument demonstrated good reliability. Self‐efficacy was positively correlated with self‐management scores, although there was no correlation between chronic kidney disease knowledge and self‐management. Conclusions: The Australian version of the Chronic Kidney Disease Self‐Management instrument was found to be a valid and reliable patient‐reported outcome measure. It can be used in clinical practice to support self‐management, as well as future research. SUMMARY STATEMENT: What is already known about this topic? The burden of chronic kidney disease is rising mostly due to the increasing prevalence of diabetes and hypertension.Chronic kidney disease progression can be slowed with effective self‐management behaviours.Patient‐reported outcome measures need testing in target populations prior to implementation in clinical settings and research. What this paper adds? The Australian version of the Chronic Kidney Disease Self‐Management instrument demonstrated good validity and reliability in the target population.The instrument is suitable to use in research testing interventions to improve self‐management of chronic kidney disease. The implications of this paper: Clinicians can use this patient‐reported outcome measure to assess for changes in CKD self‐management behaviours following patient education.The instrument can be used to identify individuals in need of support for self‐management skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF