Search

Rationale: Caffeine is a widely studied psychostimulant, even though its exact effect on brain activity remains to be elucidated. Positron emission tomography (PET) allows studying mechanisms underlying cerebral metabolic responses to caffeine in caffeine-naïve rats. Rodent studies are typically performed under anesthesia. However, the anesthesia may affect neurotransmitter systems targeted by tested drugs. Objectives: The scope of the present study was to address the impairing or enhancing effect of two common anesthetics, alpha-chloralose and isoflurane, on the kinetics of caffeine. Methods: The first group of rats (n = 15) were anesthetized under 1.5% isoflurane anesthesia. The second group of rats (n = 15) were anesthetized under alpha-chloralose (80 mg/kg). These rats received an intravenous injection of saline (n = 5) or of 2.5 mg/kg (n = 5) or 40 mg/kg (n = 5) caffeine for both groups. Results: With 2.5 mg/kg or 40 mg/kg caffeine, whole-brain cerebral metabolism was significantly reduced by 17.2% and 17% (both P < 0.01), respectively, under alpha-chloralose anesthesia. However, the lower dose of caffeine (2.5 mg/kg) had a limited effect on brain metabolism, whereas its higher dose (40 mg/kg) produced enhancements in brain metabolism in the striatum, hippocampus, and thalamus (all P < 0.05) under isoflurane anesthesia. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate significant differences in brain responses to caffeine on the basic of the anesthesia regimen used, which highlights the importance of attention to the anesthetic used when interpreting findings from animal pharmacological studies because of possible interactions between the anesthetic and the drug under study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Developing sensitive diagnostic methods for a longitudinal evaluation of the status of liver fibrosis is a priority. This study is aimed at assessing the significance of longitudinal positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 18F-labeling tracers for assessing liver fibrosis in a rat model with bile duct ligation (BDL). Twenty-one 6-week-old Sprague-Dawley male rats were used in this study. Longitudinal PET images using [18F]N-2-(2-fluoroethoxy)benzyl)-N-(4-phenoxypyridin-3-yl)acetamide ([18F]FEPPA) (n = 3), [18F]fluoroacetate ([18F]FAc) (n = 3), and 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) (n = 3) were obtained at 0, 1, and 2 weeks after BDL. Biochemical assays, histological assays, immunohistochemical staining assays, and next generation sequencing analyses were also performed at 0 (n = 3), 1 (n = 3), 2 (n = 3), and 3 (n = 3) weeks after BDL, which demonstrated the severe damage in rat livers after BDL. Regarding [18F]FEPPA and [18F]FDG, there was a significantly higher uptake in the liver after BDL (both P < 0.05), which lasted until week 2. However, the uptake of [18F]FAc in the liver was not significantly different before and after BDL (P = 0.28). Collectively, both [18F]FEPPA and [18F]FDG can serve as sensitive probes for detecting the liver fibrosis. However, [18F]FAc is not recommended to diagnose liver fibrosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Developing sensitive diagnostic methods for a longitudinal evaluation of the status of liver fibrosis is a priority. This study is aimed at assessing the significance of longitudinal positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 18F-labeling tracers for assessing liver fibrosis in a rat model with bile duct ligation (BDL). Twenty-one 6-week-old Sprague-Dawley male rats were used in this study. Longitudinal PET images using [18F]N-2-(2-fluoroethoxy)benzyl)-N-(4-phenoxypyridin-3-yl)acetamide ([18F]FEPPA) (n = 3), [18F]fluoroacetate ([18F]FAc) (n = 3), and 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) (n = 3) were obtained at 0, 1, and 2 weeks after BDL. Biochemical assays, histological assays, immunohistochemical staining assays, and next generation sequencing analyses were also performed at 0 (n = 3), 1 (n = 3), 2 (n = 3), and 3 (n = 3) weeks after BDL, which demonstrated the severe damage in rat livers after BDL. Regarding [18F]FEPPA and [18F]FDG, there was a significantly higher uptake in the liver after BDL (both P < 0.05), which lasted until week 2. However, the uptake of [18F]FAc in the liver was not significantly different before and after BDL (P = 0.28). Collectively, both [18F]FEPPA and [18F]FDG can serve as sensitive probes for detecting the liver fibrosis. However, [18F]FAc is not recommended to diagnose liver fibrosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]