Search

Background: Socioeconomic status (SES) is a key determinant of health. However, ascertaining the SES in developing countries is really challenging. Hence, we decided to develop an asset-based simple and rational SES tool for urban population of Puducherry and compare it with Modified Kuppuswamy's (MK) scale. Materials and Methods: Sequential mixed methods design was used. The list of local household assets to determine SES was created based on group interviews with stakeholders and review of literature. Then, survey was carried out among 500 urban households by trained medical interns after obtaining informed consent. EpiCollect-5, mobile-based software, was used to capture data. Principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out to construct a wealth index using SPSS version 24. The assets included in the final PCA were ranked based on their contribution to the index by linear regression. Results: The eigenvalue for the first principal component was 6.7 accounting for 33.6% of the variance in the original data. Finally, reduced 10-item-based SES scale was created and scoring system was formulated based on regression coefficient. The weighted kappa statistics and correlation coefficient measure of reliability between household quintiles on 20-item and 10-item reduced SES tool were 0.77 and 0.95, respectively. There was a moderate correlation between SES obtained from MK scale and newly constructed scale. Conclusions: The newly devised SES scale is context specific, reliable, easy to administer, and quick to ascertain the SES and thus can be used for a similar context in future health research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previously, we had a course in epidemiology for medical undergraduates that was based on traditional lecture methods with no formal formative assessment (FA). We found poor uptake of our course in terms of learning and attendance by students. Objective: The objective was to assess the effect of improved course (interactive lectures and formal FA) in epidemiology on student learning and attendance. Materials and Methods: It was a triangulation type of mixed-methods program evaluation, where both quantitative (quasi-experimental design) and qualitative (open-ended responses) analysis was done. This study was carried out in the department of community medicine in a tertiary care teaching hospital, Puducherry. We improved the quality of the course material, interaction in lectures and included formal structured FA in the last course. Kirkpatrick's framework was used for the course evaluation. We compared the performance of three batches to check the effect of our revisions on students' learning and their attendance. Results: Student's learning outcome was measured using end-of-course assessment scores (Level-2). The percentage of students successfully completing the course improved from 39% to 81% and attendance status of ≥90% improved from 50% to 57%. Learner's immediate reactions (Level-1) were captured using open-ended questions, and content analysis was done. Students appreciated the course material, FAs, and in-class activity. Conclusions: Little improvement in a traditional epidemiology course for undergraduates in the form of interactive lectures and formative feedback and providing the student with course material led to significant gains in students' knowledge and attendance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]