Search

Proposals to establish pan-Canadian licensure for physicians have broad support amongst medical groups to address physician shortages in underserved rural communities. The concept has also elicited concern from some stakeholders that its implementation could exacerbate rural physician workforce shortages by prompting an exodus of rural physicians to urban centres. An environmental scan of reports from key medical groups published within the past 10 years was conducted to determine factors influencing rural physician practice patterns. Data from membership surveys of the Society of Rural Physicians of Canada and the Canadian Medical Association – conducted in fall 2022 – were reviewed to determine whether licensure is a factor in rural physicians' decisions to leave or stay in practice in rural Canada. Factors contributing to physicians' decisions to leave rural practice identified in the environmental scan included lack of infrastructure support, inability to find locum coverage, inadequate support for team-based care and effects of high workloads on wellness. A common theme found in responses to the membership surveys was the recognition of licensing restrictions as barriers preventing rural physicians from practising in multiple provinces or territories. Survey respondents also voiced strong support for national licensure implementation. Pan-Canadian licensure holds promise as a strategy to enhance the recruitment and retention of physicians in rural communities. It could also provide physicians flexibility to work in multiple jurisdictions to address the health workforce needs of underserved communities. Résumé Les propositions visant à établir un permis d'exercice pancanadien pour les médecins bénéficient d'un large soutien de la part des groupes médicaux afin de remédier aux pénuries de médecins dans les communautés rurales mal desservies. Ce concept a également suscité des inquiétudes de la part de certaines parties prenantes qui craignent que sa mise en æuvre n'aggrave les pénuries de médecins en milieu rural en provoquant l'exode de ces derniers vers les centres urbains. Une analyse environnementale des rapports des principaux groupes médicaux publiés au cours des dix dernières années a été effectuée pour déterminer les facteurs influençant les modes de pratique des médecins ruraux. Les données des enquêtes sur les membres de la Société de la médecine rurale du Canada et de l'Association médicale canadienne-menées à l'automne 2022-ont été examinées pour déterminer si le permis d'exercice est un facteur dans la décision des médecins ruraux de quitter ou de rester en pratique dans les régions rurales du Canada. Les facteurs contribuant à la décision des médecins de quitter la pratique rurale, identifiés dans l'analyse de l'environnement, comprenaient le manque de soutien en matière d'infrastructure, l'incapacité à trouver une couverture de suppléance, le soutien inadéquat des soins en équipe et les effets des charges de travail élevées sur le bien-être. Un thème commun ressorti des réponses aux enquêtes menées auprès des membres est la reconnaissance des restrictions en matière de permis d'exercice en tant qu'obstacles empêchant les médecins ruraux d'exercer dans plusieurs provinces ou territoires. Les répondants à l'enquête ont également exprimé leur soutien à la mise en place d'un système national de permis d'exercice. Le permis d'exercice pancanadien est une stratégie prometteuse pour améliorer le recrutement et la fidélisation des médecins dans les communautés rurales. Il pourrait également permettre aux médecins de travailler dans plusieurs administrations afin de répondre aux besoins en personnel de santé des communautés mal desservies. Mots-clés: Ressources humaines en santé, autorisation d'exercice, autorisation d'exercer nationale, permis d'exercer pancanadienne, enregistrement national, pénurie de médecins, effectifs de médecins [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is used for diagnostic and procedural guidance by physicians in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL). POCUS use is largely limited to urban locations and the training is variable amongst physicians. The primary aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of POCUS devices in NL and the secondary aim was to characterise the patterns of POCUS use amongst physicians in NL. Methods: This is a mixed-methods cross-sectional study. We determined the prevalence of POCUS devices from purchase records and the patterns of POCUS use through theme-based interviews. The interviews were transcribed, coded and analysed using standardised qualitative methods. Results: Ten physicians (3 females, 5 rural) participated in the interviews. The overall prevalence of POCUS devices in NL was 12.5/100,000 population. Participants in urban areas had more access to POCUS training and devices. Participants used POCUS on a daily or weekly basis to rule in or out life-threatening conditions and improve access to specialist care. The benefits of POCUS included expedited investigations, decreased radiation and increased patient satisfaction. The barriers to using POCUS were lack of training, time, devices, image archiving software, difficulty generating and interpreting images and patient body habitus. Conclusion: This is the first study to our knowledge to report the prevalence of POCUS devices in Canada. Physicians who practise in rural NL have limited access to POCUS devices and have identified barriers to POCUS training. Connecting physicians in rural areas with POCUS experts through a province-wide POCUS network may address these barriers and improve healthcare access. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are a commonly prescribed class of antibiotics in Canada. Evidence of a constellation of possible adverse events is developing. Central and peripheral nervous system abnormalities and collagen-related events (including aortic aneurysm/dissection, tendinopathy/rupture and retinal detachment) are associated with FQ exposure in large population-based aftermarket studies. In 2017, Health Canada warned about rare FQ-related persistent or disabling side effects. This study explores FQ use in a rural community. Methods: Antibiotic prescriptions (including FQs) in the over 18 adult population (5416) were measured in the town of Sioux Lookout for 5 years, January 2013 to 31 December 2017. Results: FQ prescriptions accounted for 16.0% of adult antibiotics, superseded by penicillins (21.1%) and macrolides (18.2%). Ciprofloxacin accounted for one half of FQ use (51.2%), followed by levofloxacin (36.7%) and norfloxacin (13.3%). FQs were commonly used for respiratory (33%) and urinary tract infections (18%). Conclusion: Aftermarket evidence reports increased risk of 'disabling and persistent serious adverse events'(Health Canada) in patients using FQs. Appropriate clinical caution should be exercised in the prescribing of FQs. Common overuse seems to occur in the treatment of uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia and cystitis, despite recommendations to use other antimicrobial agents as first-line treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]