Search

Background: In postoperative patients with breast cancer, the combination of an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by a taxane is a standard regimen. In the current study, the authors examined whether AC could be safely omitted, and compared the effectiveness of paclitaxel versus docetaxel.Methods: Female postoperative patients with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer were eligible for enrollment in this phase 3, open-label, randomized controlled trial at 84 centers in Japan. Patients were randomized to 4 cycles of doxorubicin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide at a dose of 600 mg/m2 (AC) followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m2 (ACpT) or AC followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m2 (ACdT), or 8 cycles of paclitaxel (PTx) or docetaxel (DTx) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival adverse events. The authors adopted a 2 × 2 factorial design to examine the AC containing-regimens (ACpT and ACdT) versus the AC free-regimens (PTx and DTx), and the paclitaxel-containing regimens (ACpT and PTx) versus the docetaxel-containing regimens (ACdT and DTx).Results: Of 1060 patients, 1049 were treated and included in the intention-to-treat population. The DFS results did not demonstrate noninferiority between the AC-containing and the AC-free regimens (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.982-1.448 [Pnoninferiority  = .30]). Better outcomes were noted in patients treated with the docetaxel-containing regimens compared with the paclitaxel-containing regimens with respect to DFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.589-0.875 [P = .0008]) and overall survival (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.574-0.980 [P = .035]). Neutropenia, nausea, and vomiting were found to occur more often in the AC-containing arms, whereas the incidence of edema was greater in the docetaxel-containing treatment arms.Conclusions: Noninferiority in DFS was not demonstrated between the AC-containing and AC-free regimens. Compared with a similar regimen of paclitaxel, docetaxel appeared to increase the DFS. Cancer 2017;123:759-68. © 2016 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 ( HER3) expression in lung and breast cancers has a negative impact on survival. Patritumab, a human anti- HER3 m Ab, has shown anticancer activity in preclinical models. This study examined the safety and pharmacokinetics of patritumab in combination with trastuzumab and paclitaxel in patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. In this open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation, phase Ib study, patients received patritumab 9 or 18 mg/kg plus trastuzumab and paclitaxel at known tolerated doses. Safety and tolerability were assessed based on dose-limiting toxicities and other non-life threatening adverse events. The pharmacokinetic profile for patritumab was determined based on the target trough level. Clinical efficacy was evaluated based on the overall response rate and progression-free survival. Six patients received patritumab 9 mg/kg and 12 received 18 mg/kg. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, alopecia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and maculopapular rash. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The target trough serum concentration was achieved in all patients at a dose of 18 mg/kg. Overall response rate was 38.9% and median progression-free survival was 274 days. In conclusion, patritumab plus trastuzumab and paclitaxel was tolerable and efficacious at both doses. We recommend the dose level of 18 mg/kg for future phase II studies. (Clinical trial registration: Japic CTI-121772.) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This phase I study in Japanese patients evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of palbociclib, a highly selective and reversible oral cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, as monotherapy for solid tumors (part 1) and combined with letrozole as first-line treatment of postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (part 2). Part 1 evaluated palbociclib 100 and 125 mg once daily (3 weeks on/1 week off; n = 6 each group) to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Part 2 evaluated palbociclib maximum tolerated dose (125 mg) plus letrozole 2.5 mg ( n = 6). The most common treatment-related adverse event was neutropenia (all grades/grade 3/4): 100 mg, 83%/67%; 125 mg, 67%/33%; and palbociclib plus letrozole, 100%/83%. Heavier pretreatment with chemotherapy may have resulted in higher neutropenia rates observed with the 100-mg dose. Palbociclib exposure was higher with 125 vs 100 mg (mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve over dosing interval [τ]: 1322 vs 547.5 ng·h/mL [single dose], 2838 vs 1276 ng·h/mL [multiple dose]; mean maximum plasma concentration: 104.1 vs 41.4 ng/mL [single dose], 185.5 vs 77.4 ng/mL [multiple dose]). Half-life was 23-26 h. No drug-drug interactions between palbociclib and letrozole occurred. Four patients had stable disease (≥24 weeks in one patient with rectal cancer [100 mg] and one with esophageal cancer [125 mg]) in part 1; two patients had partial response and two had stable disease (both ≥24 weeks) in part 2. Palbociclib at the 125-mg dose (schedule 3/1) was tolerated and is the recommended dose for monotherapy and letrozole combination therapy in Japanese patients. The trials are registered with : A5481010 and NCT01684215. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]