Search

Rationale: The cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) signaling transduction pathway has been shown to play an important role in the modulation of several ethanol-induced behaviors. Different studies have demonstrated intracellular calcium (Ca(2+))-dependent activation of the PKA cascade after ethanol administration. Thus, the cAMP cascade mediator Ca(2+)-dependent calmodulin (CaM) has been strongly implicated in the central effects of ethanol., Objectives: In this study, we assessed the role of the CaM inhibitor W7 on ethanol-induced stimulation, ethanol intake, and ethanol-induced activation of PKA., Methods: Swiss mice were pretreated with W7 (0-10 mg/kg) 30 min before ethanol (0-3.75 g/kg) administration. Immediately, animals were placed during 20 min in an open-field chamber. Ethanol (10 %, v/v) intake in 2 h was assessed using a limited access paradigm. Experiments with caffeine (0-15 mg/kg), cocaine (0-4 mg/kg), and saccharine (0.1 %, w/v) were designed to compare their results to those obtained with ethanol. Western blot was assayed 45 min after ethanol administration., Results: Results showed that pretreatment with W7, reduced selectively in a dose-dependent fashion ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation and ethanol intake. The ethanol-induced activation of PKA was also prevented by W7 administration., Conclusions: These results demonstrate that CaM inhibition resulted in a selective reduction of ethanol-stimulating effects and ethanol intake. The PKA activation induced by ethanol was blocked after the CaM blockade with W7. These results provide further evidence of the key role of cellular Ca(2+)-dependent pathways on the central effects of ethanol.

Previous studies have shown that both 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (AT), which inhibits metabolism of ethanol (EtOH) to acetaldehyde by inhibiting catalase, and D-penicillamine (D-P), an acetaldehyde-sequestering agent, modulate EtOH-conditioned place preference (CPP) in male albino Swiss (IOPS Orl) mice. These studies followed a reference-dose-like procedure, which involves comparing cues that have both been paired with EtOH. However, the role of EtOH-derived acetaldehyde has not been examined using a standard CPP method, and efficacy of these treatments could be different under the two circumstances. In the present investigation, we manipulated the strength of CPP across five separate studies and evaluated the effect of D-P and AT on EtOH-induced CPP following a standard unbiased CPP procedure. Mice received pairings with vehicle-saline injections with one cue and, alternatively, with AT- and D-P-EtOH with another cue. Our studies indicate that AT and D-P only disrupt CPP induced by EtOH in mice when the number of conditioning sessions and the dose of EtOH are low. These findings suggest that acquisition of EtOH-induced CPP may depend on the levels of acetaldehyde available during memory acquisition and the strength of the memory. Therefore, we propose that, at least when the memory processes are labile, brain acetaldehyde could participate in the formation of Pavlovian learning elicited by EtOH.

Rationale: Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is the co-substrate used by catalase to metabolize ethanol to acetaldehyde in the brain. This centrally formed acetaldehyde has been involved in several ethanol-related behaviors., Objectives: The present research evaluated the effect of the H2O2 scavenger, alpha lipoic acid (LA), on the acquisition and reconditioning of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP)., Methods: Mice received pairings of a distinctive floor stimulus (CS+) associated with intraperitoneal injections of ethanol (2.5 g/kg). On alternate days, animals received pairings of a different floor stimulus (CS-) associated with saline injections. A different group of animals received pairings with the (CS-) associated with saline injections, and on alternate days they received LA (100 mg/kg) injected 30 min prior to ethanol (2.5 g/kg) administration paired with the (CS+). A preference test assessed the effect of LA on the acquisition of ethanol-induced CPP. A similar procedure was followed to study the effect of LA on the acquisition of cocaine- and morphine-induced CPP. A separate experiment evaluated the effect of LA on the reconditioning of ethanol-induced CPP. In addition, we investigated the consequence of LA administration on central H2O2 levels., Results: LA selectively blocked the acquisition of ethanol-induced CPP. Moreover, this compound impaired the reconditioning of ethanol-induced CPP. Additionally, we found that LA diminished H2O2 levels in the brain., Conclusions: These data suggest that a decline in H2O2 availability by LA might impede the formation of brain ethanol-derived acetaldehyde by catalase, which results in an impairment of the rewarding properties of ethanol.

Rationale: The main system of central ethanol oxidation is mediated by the enzyme catalase. By reacting with H(2)O(2), brain catalase forms compound I (the catalase-H(2)O(2) system), which is able to oxidize ethanol to acetaldehyde in the brain. Previous studies have demonstrated that pharmacological manipulations of brain catalase activity modulate the stimulant effects of ethanol in mice. However, the role of H(2)O(2) in the behavioral effects of ethanol has not yet been clearly addressed., Objectives: In the present study, we investigated the effects of alpha-lipoic acid (LA), a scavenging agent for H(2)O(2), on ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation., Methods: CD-1 mice were pretreated with LA [0-100 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (IP)] 0-60 min prior to administration of ethanol (0-3.75 g/kg, IP). In another experiment, animals were pretreated with LA (0, 25, or 50 mg/kg, IP) 30 min before cocaine (10 mg/kg, IP), amphetamine (2 mg/kg, IP), or caffeine (25 mg/kg, IP). After these treatments the animals were placed in an open-field chamber and their locomotor activity was measured for 20 min., Results: LA 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg IP prevented ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation. LA did not affect the locomotor-stimulating effects of cocaine, amphetamine, and caffeine. Additionally, we demonstrated that LA prevents the inactivation of brain catalase by 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole, thus indicating that H(2)O(2) levels are reduced by LA., Conclusions: These data support the idea that a decrease in cerebral H(2)O(2) production by LA administration inhibits ethanol-stimulated locomotion. This study suggests that the brain catalase-H(2)O(2) system, and by implication centrally formed acetaldehyde, plays a key role in the psychopharmacological effects of ethanol.

Rationale: Considerable evidence indicates that brain ethanol metabolism mediated by catalase is involved in modulating some of the behavioral and physiological effects of this drug, which suggests that the first metabolite of ethanol, acetaldehyde, may have central actions. Previous results have shown that acetaldehyde administered into the lateral ventricles produced anxiolysis in a novel open arena in rats., Objectives: The present studies investigate the effects of centrally formed acetaldehyde on ethanol-induced anxiolysis., Materials and Methods: The effects of the catalase inhibitor sodium azide (SA; 0 or 10 mg/kg, IP) on ethanol-induced anxiolysis (0.0, 0.5, or 1.0 g/kg, IP) were evaluated in CD1 mice in two anxiety paradigms, the elevated plus maze and the dark/light box. Additional studies assessed the effect of the noncompetitive catalase inhibitor 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (AT; 0.5 g/kg, IP) and the acetaldehyde inactivation agent D: -penicillamine (50 mg/kg, IP) on the plus maze., Results: SA reduced the anxiolytic effects of ethanol on several parameters evaluated in the elevated plus maze and in the dark/light box. In the plus maze, AT completely blocked and D-penicillamine significantly reduced the anxiolytic properties of ethanol., Conclusions: Thus, when cerebral metabolism of ethanol into acetaldehyde is blocked by catalase inhibitors, or acetaldehyde is inactivated, there is a suppressive effect on the anxiolytic actions of ethanol. These data provide further support for the idea that centrally formed or administered acetaldehyde can contribute to some of the psychopharmacological actions of ethanol, including its anxiolytic properties.

Rationale: There is evidence to suggest that acetaldehyde is involved in the control of ethanol-seeking behavior and reward. D -penicillamine, a thiol amino acid, is a highly selective agent for the inactivation of acetaldehyde. Previous studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that D -penicillamine prevents both behavioral stimulation induced by ethanol and acetaldehyde-produced locomotor depression in mice., Objectives: The contribution of ethanol-derived acetaldehyde to the affective effects of ethanol (preference and aversion) was assessed using an unbiased place conditioning design., Methods: Male mice received four pairings of a distinctive floor stimulus (CS+: GRID+ or HOLE+) with injections of saline and ethanol (2 g/kg) given before (preference) or after (aversion) the 5-min exposure to the place conditioning apparatus. A different floor stimulus (CS-: GRID- or HOLE-), associated with saline-saline injections on alternate days, was presented. For a different group of animals, the pairings with the CS+ were associated with saline and ethanol injections, but on alternate days, they received D -penicillamine (50 or 75 mg/kg) and ethanol injections paired with the CS-floor stimulus. A 60-min preference test was carried out 24 h after the last conditioning trial. A similar procedure was followed to test the effect of D -penicillamine on morphine (16 mg/kg) and cocaine-induced (20 mg/kg) conditioned place preference (CPP)., Results: CPP and conditioned place aversion (CPA) were observed for ethanol, but D -penicillamine only blocked CPP. D -penicillamine, by itself, did not produce either rewarding or aversive effects. CPP observed for morphine and cocaine was unaffected by D -penicillamine pretreatment., Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that the selective inactivation of acetaldehyde blocked the rewarding, but not aversive, effects of ethanol and support the role of this ethanol metabolite in the affective properties of ethanol.

Rationale: Novelty associated with behavioral testing has been shown to enhance psychostimulant- and morphine-induced locomotor stimulation. Evidence has demonstrated that novelty increases dopamine (DA) activity, and habituation to a novel environment reduces such activation. However, it is not clear whether novelty modulates ethanol-induced behavioral stimulation and whether DA plays a role in this effect., Objectives: The present work sought to demonstrate a role of habituation to test procedure as a factor that could modulate the involvement of DA in ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation., Methods: Non-habituated (NH) and habituated (H) Swiss mice pretreated with DA D1- (SCH23390; 0-0.045 mg/kg) or D2-receptor (sulpiride; 0-50 mg/kg) antagonists were tested for ethanol (0-2.5 g/kg)-induced locomotor stimulation. Experiments with amphetamine (0-4 mg/kg), morphine (0-5 mg/kg) and caffeine (0-15 mg/kg)were designed to compare their results to those obtained with ethanol. The effect of the non-selective opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone (0-1.5 mg/kg) was also tested on ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation., Results: NH and H animals did not differ in their locomotor response to ethanol or caffeine; however, amphetamine- and morphine-induced stimulation was greater in NH than in H mice. SCH23390 only reduced ethanol-induced stimulation at doses that also reduced spontaneous activity in both NH and H mice. Sulpiride decreased ethanol-stimulated behavior only in the NH condition. Habituation did not modify the effect of sulpiride on amphetamine-, morphine- or caffeine-induced activation. Naltrexone (0-1.5 mg/kg) reduced ethanol-induced stimulation regardless of habituation., Conclusions: The present data suggest that the participation of DA D2-receptors in ethanol-induced behavioral stimulation requires the presence of novelty. Results also support the involvement of neurotransmitter systems other than DA (i.e., endogenous opioid system) as important substrates mediating ethanol-induced locomotor activation.

Rationale: Over the last few years, a role for the brain catalase-H(2)O(2) enzymatic system has been suggested in the behavioural effects observed in rodents after ethanol administration. This role seems to be related to the ability of cerebral catalase to metabolise ethanol to acetaldehyde using H(2)O(2)as a co-substrate. On the other hand, it has been shown that normobaric hyperoxia increases the rate of cerebral H(2)O(2) production in rodents in vivo. Thus, substrate-level changes could regulate brain catalase activity, thereby modulating the behavioural effects of ethanol., Objectives: The aim of the present study was to assess if the enhancement of cerebral H(2)O(2) production after hyperoxia exposure results in a boost of ethanol-induced locomotion in mice., Methods: CD-1 mice were exposed to air or 99.5% O(2) inhalation (for 15, 30, or 45 min) and 0, 30, 60 or 120 min after this treatment, ethanol-induced locomotion was measured. The H(2)O(2)-mediated inactivation of endogenous brain catalase activity following an injection of 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole was used as a measure of the rate of cerebral H(2)O(2) production., Results: Hyperoxia exposure (30 or 45 min) potentiated the locomotor-stimulating effects of ethanol (2.5 or 3.0 g/kg), whereas cocaine (4 mg/kg) or caffeine (15 mg/kg)-induced locomotion and blood ethanol levels were unaffected. Moreover, the results also confirmed brain H(2)O(2) overproduction in mice., Conclusions: The present results suggest that an increase in brain H(2)O(2) production potentiates ethanol-induced locomotion. Therefore, this study provides further support for the notion that the brain catalase-H(2)O(2) system, and by implication centrally formed acetaldehyde, plays a key role in the mediation of ethanol's psychopharmacological effects.

Rationale: It has been proposed that brain aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) plays a role in the modulation of some psychopharmacological effects of ethanol. Diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC), an ALDH inhibitor, elevates blood acetaldehyde levels in the presence of ethanol. Concurrent administration with 4-methylpyrazole (4-MP), an alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitor, prevents peripheral accumulation of acetaldehyde by DDTC., Objective: To investigate the effects of concurrent DDTC and 4-MP administration on ethanol-induced locomotor activity in mice., Methods: Mice were pretreated IP with saline (S+S) or 4-MP (10 mg/kg) (S+4-MP), then received IP injections of ethanol (0, 0.8, 1.6, 2.4, 3.2 and 4 g/kg) prior to testing in the open field., Results: Pretreatment with 4-MP does not modify the spontaneous or ethanol-induced locomotor activity. In the second experiment, the DDTC (114, 228 and 456 mg/kg) and 4-MP (DDTC+4-MP) were administered 8 h prior to testing locomotor activity in the open field. Animals were then treated with ethanol (0, 0.8, 1.6, 2.4, 3.2 and 4 g/kg), and placed in open field chambers. The locomotor activity of animals pretreated with DDTC and 4-MP was significantly enhanced here compared to groups S+S and S+4-MP. These effects cannot be attributed to elevated blood acetaldehyde levels, as pretreatment with 4-MP prevented peripheral accumulation of acetaldehyde., Conclusions: These data suggest that brain ALDH may contribute to the effects of ethanol on locomotor activity. This role of the enzyme ALDH in some of the psychopharmacological effects of ethanol may be a result of its ability to regulate levels of acetaldehyde in brain.

The present study was designed in an attempt to assess a previously suggested role of brain catalase activity in ethanol-induced behaviour by examining ethanol-induced locomotor activity in cyanamide-treated mice. Mice were pretreated with IP injections of the catalase inhibitor cyanamide (3.75, 7.5, 15, 30 or 45 mg/kg) or saline. Following this treatment, animals in each group received IP injections of ethanol (0.0, 1.6, 2.4 or 3.2 g/kg) and locomotion was recorded. Several time intervals (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 or 25 h) between the two treatments were also evaluated. Results indicated that cyanamide administration produced a dose-dependent decrease in ethanol-induced locomotor activity that depends on the time between treatments. However, cyanamide did not change spontaneous or d-amphetamine-induced locomotor activity. Moreover, an additive effect of cyanamide and another brain catalase inhibitor, 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (AT), on the reduction of ethanol-induced locomotor activity was observed. Perfused brain homogenates of mice treated with cyanamide, AT or cyanamide+AT showed a significant reduction of brain catalase activity. The dose and time patterns of both effects were closely related and a significant correlation between them was obtained. These results suggest that cyanamide could reduce locomotor activity through its inhibition of brain catalase, giving further support to the notion that brain catalase may be an important regulator of some ethanol-induced behavioural effects.

In the present investigation we questioned whether taurine antagonized the effects of ethanol on motor activity measured in the open field. Ten minutes following simultaneous administration (IP) of ethanol (1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 g/kg) or saline and taurine (30, 45 and 60 mg/kg) or saline, mice were placed in open field chambers and locomotor activity was measured during a 10 min testing period. A significant interaction was found between taurine and ethanol. Taurine-treated mice displayed lower motor excitation with the 1.0 g/kg dose of ethanol than the saline group treated with the same dose of ethanol. However at the 2.0 g/kg ethanol dose, taurine-treated mice demonstrated higher motor activity than the saline treated mice, once again, treated with the same dose of ethanol. No differences in blood ethanol levels were observed between the two groups. In a second study, taurine administration (30, 45 and 60 mg/kg) did not show any effect on d-amphetamine-induced enhancement of locomotor activity (1, 2, and 3 mg/kg). Data from this study demonstrated an interaction between taurine and ethanol in their effect on locomotor activity in the open field.

The involvement of endogenous opioid mechanisms in the interaction between stress and ethanol was investigated in the rat. Animals were pretreated with naltrexone (10 mg/kg) or saline 3 h before a second injection consisting of ethanol (1.0 g/kg) or saline. They were then restrained for 15 or 60 min or left in home cages for an equivalent amount of time. After restraint, animals were either subjected to an open-field test or decapitated to collect blood for corticosterone determinations. Locomotor depression was found to be induced by 15 but not 60 min restraint. In naltrexone-treated animals, however, 60 min restraint was also found to induce locomotor depression. Ethanol pretreatment was found to block the locomotor depression induced by 15 min restraint. Such an interaction was in turn antagonized by naltrexone. In the 15 min condition, stress and ethanol were also found to interact in their effects on plasma levels of corticosterone. Naltrexone did not alter any effects of the stressors on corticosterone levels. These results provide support for the involvement of endogenous opioid mechanisms in the interaction of stress and ethanol at a behavioural level.

The possible involvement of catecholamines (CA) in the mediation of acetaldehyde's conditioned taste aversion (CTA) was examined by testing the effects of alpha-methyl-para-tyrosine (AMPT, a tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor) on the CTAs produced by acetaldehyde. AMPT blocked the acquisition of the CTA normally produced by a low dose of acetaldehyde (0.2 g/kg), but had no significant effect on CTA produced by a high dose of acetaldehyde (0.3 g/kg). In a second study, acetaldehyde's role in the CTA produced by ethanol was investigated using the pre-exposure conditioned taste aversion paradigm. Pre-exposure to acetaldehyde (both doses) blocked the ethanol CTAs but when pre-exposure with acetaldehyde was coupled with AMPT, only the larger dose of acetaldehyde blocked the ethanol aversion. These results suggest that while the CTA to the low dose of acetaldehyde may be primarily central and catecholamine-mediated, the mechanism underlying the high dose CTA is probably peripheral and emetic in nature. These findings support the conclusion that acetaldehyde may be mediating many of the actions of ethanol.

Voluntary ethanol consumption and high Km (mM range) brain and liver aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity were measured in male rats of the Long-Evans, Wistar and Sprague-Dawley strains. The total amounts of ethanol consumed by the three strains did not differ significantly, nor did the levels of cerebral ALDH activity. Levels of brain ALDH did not differ as a function of ethanol exposure and across strains. Levels of ethanol consumption correlated better with levels of brain than liver aldehyde-oxidizing capacity, which were tested separately for each strain and also combining all the animals. Inherent variation in brain ALDH may be a biochemical counterpart of observed differences in voluntary ethanol intake within strains.

Catalase activity in blood collected from young rats naive to ethanol (65 days) was significantly and positively correlated with later voluntary consumption of ethanol. Catalase activity levels were also correlated with catalase activity in brain and blood sampled after exposure to ethanol. The results obtained in the present study extend and confirm earlier findings (Aragon et al. 1985c) that brain catalase activity and voluntary ethanol intake are unidirectionally and causally related. The results also suggest that brain catalase activity may be part of an enzymatic system controlling the production and elimination of acetaldehyde in brain. This system may be a biological marker system mediating the affinity of organisms to ingest ethanol.

Rationale: Opioid receptor antagonists reliably alter the expression or extinction of ethanol's conditioned motivational effects as indexed by the place conditioning procedure, suggesting endogenous opioids are normally involved. These studies examined how exogenous stimulation of opioid receptors alters ethanol's conditioned rewarding and aversive effects., Objectives: Drugs that either directly (morphine) or indirectly (ethanol) stimulate opioid receptors were tested for their effects on the expression and extinction of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) and conditioned place aversion (CPA)., Methods: Male DBA/2J mice were exposed to unbiased ethanol (2 g/kg) conditioning procedures that produced either CPP (experiments 1-2) or CPA (experiments 3-4). Morphine (0, 2.5, 5, or 10 mg/kg) was injected before three post-conditioning tests in experiments 1 and 3, whereas ethanol (0, 1, 2, or 3 g/kg) was injected before tests in experiments 2 and 4. All groups received vehicle on test 4 to determine whether the drug pretreatments altered the course of extinction., Results: Morphine dose-dependently enhanced CPP expression (experiment 1), but ethanol dose-dependently reduced CPP expression (experiment 2). Test 4 showed no differences between drug-treated mice and mice given vehicle on all tests. Morphine had no effect on expression or extinction of ethanol-induced CPA (experiment 3). The highest ethanol dose (3 g/kg) interfered with CPA expression, but not extinction (experiment 4)., Conclusions: Pretreatment drug effects on ethanol CPP and CPA expression were most likely a byproduct of their activity altering effects rather than opioid-receptor mediated modulation of ethanol's conditioned motivational effects. Neither drug affected the course of extinction.