Search

We examined international osteoporosis guidelines to determine the tools used to assess fracture risk, the classification of fracture risk presented, and the recommendations based on fracture risk status. We conducted a document analysis of guidelines from the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) website retrieved as of May 10, 2018, focusing on guidelines written in English only. Two reviewers independently reviewed each document and the following data were extracted: (1) fracture risk tool(s) endorsed; (2) classification system used to describe fracture risk status (e.g., low, moderate, high); and (3) recommendations based on risk status (e.g., pharmacological treatment). Two additional reviewers verified all data extraction. A total of 112 guidelines were listed on the IOF website, of which 94 were located either through the provided link or through a PubMed search. Of 70 guidelines written in English, 63 guidelines discussed the concept of fracture risk of which, 39 endorsed FRAX. Twenty-eight guidelines defined fracture risk categories or thresholds which determined recommendations. In total, 26 provided a risk category or threshold which constituted an indication for pharmacotherapy. Twelve guidelines reported a moderate, medium, or intermediate risk category which was associated with variable recommendations for testing and treatment. Despite the generally accepted international shift to fracture risk as a basis for treatment decisions, the majority of guidelines in English did not provide treatment recommendations based on fracture risk status. In guidelines with recommendations based on fracture risk status, thresholds and recommendations varied making international comparisons of treatment difficult. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine experiences and behaviours with bone health management post-fracture among members of a national osteoporosis (OP) patient group. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in English-speaking members of the group who had sustained a fragility fracture at 50+ years old and were not taking OP pharmacotherapy at the time of that fracture. Participants were recruited through an advertisement in the patient group newsletter and interviewed for ~1 h by telephone, responding to questions regarding visits to health care providers and their behaviours regarding bone health. We analysed the data following Giorgi's methodology. Results: Twenty-eight eligible participants (26 females, two males; 78 % response rate) aged 51-89 years old completed an interview. More than half of our participants described effective consumer behaviours, including making requests of health care providers for referrals to bone specialists, bone mineral density tests, and prescription medication. Conclusion: Members of an OP patient group described effective consumer behaviours that could be incorporated as skill sets in post-fracture interventions to improve bone health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]