Search

Many Saccharomyces cerevisiae duplicate genes that were derived from an ancient whole-genome duplication (WGD) unexpectedly show a small synonymous divergence (Ks), a higher sequence similarity to each other than to orthologues in Saccharomyces bayanus, or slow evolution compared with the orthologue in Kluyveromyces waltii, a non-WGD species. This decelerated evolution was attributed to gene conversion between duplicates. Using [approximately equal to] 300 WGD gene pairs in four species and their orthologues in non-WGD species, we show that codon-usage bias and proteinsequence conservation are two important causes for decelerated evolution of duplicate genes, whereas gene conversion is effective only in the presence of strong codon-usage bias or protein-sequence conservation. Furthermore, we find that change in mutation pattern or in tDNA copy number changed codon-usage bias and increased the Ks distance between K. waltii and S. cerevisiae. Intriguingly, some proteins showed fast evolution before the radiation of WGD species but little or no sequence divergence between orthologues and paralogues thereafter, indicating that functional conservation after the radiation may also be responsible for decelerated evolution in duplicates. selective constraints | whole-genome duplication | concerted evolution | decelerated evolution

The question of how duplicate genes are retained in a population remains controversial. The duplication-degeneration-complementation model, which involves no positive selection, stipulates a higher retention rate of duplicate genes in a small population than in a large one. This model has been accepted by many evolutionists. However, we found considerably more retentions and fewer losses of duplicate genes in the mouse genome than in the human genome, although the population size of rodents is in general larger than that of primates. Indeed, in nearly every interval of synonymous divergence between duplicate genes, the number of gene retentions in mouse is larger than that in human. Our findings suggest a more important role of positive selection in duplicate retention than duplication--degeneration-complementation. In addition, certain functional categories show a higher tendency of lineage-specific expansion than expected, suggesting lineage-specific selection or functional bias in retained duplicates. functional bias | gene duplication | lineage specific expansion | duplicability

Many Saccharomyces cerevisiae duplicate genes that were derived from an ancient whole-genome duplication (WGD) unexpectedly show a small synonymous divergence (Ks), a higher sequence similarity to each other than to orthologues in Saccharomyces bayanus, or slow evolution compared with the orthologue in Kluyveromyces waltii, a non-WGD species. This decelerated evolution was attributed to gene conversion between duplicates. Using ≈300 WGD gene pairs in four species and their orthologues in non-WGD species, we show that codon-usage bias and protein-sequence conservation are two important causes for decelerated evolution of duplicate genes, whereas gene conversion is effective only in the presence of strong codon-usage bias or protein-sequence conservation. Furthermore, we find that change in mutation pattern or in tDNA copy number changed codon-usage bias and increased the Ks distance between K. waltii and S. cerevisiae. Intriguingly, some proteins showed fast evolution before the radiation of WGD species but little or no sequence divergence between orthologues and paralogues thereafter, indicating that functional conservation after the radiation may also be responsible for decelerated evolution in duplicates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The question of how duplicate genes are retained in a population remains controversial. The duplication-degeneration-complementation model, which involves no positive selection, stipulates a higher retention rate of duplicate genes in a small population than in a large one. This model has been accepted by many evolutionists. However, we found considerably more retentions and fewer losses of duplicate genes in the mouse genome than in the human genome, although the population size of rodents is in general larger than that of primates. Indeed, in nearly every interval of synonymous divergence between duplicate genes, the number of gene retentions in mouse is larger than that in human. Our findings suggest a more important role of positive selection in duplicate retention than duplication-degeneration-complementation. In addition, certain functional categories show a higher tendency of lineage-specific expansion than expected, suggesting lineage-specific selection or functional bias in retained duplicates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]