Search

Background: The first International Consensus Conference for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC1) took place 10 years ago in November 2011. The rationale was – and still is – to standardize treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) based on the available evidence and to ensure that worldwide all breast cancer patients receive adequate treatment and access to new therapies. Rationale for the Manuscript: The 6th International Consensus Conference for ABC (ABC6) took place from November 4 to 6, 2021 and was the first in a purely online format, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the present manuscript, a working group of German breast cancer experts comments on the voting results of the ABC6 panelists regarding their applicability for routine clinical practice in Germany. Method: The ABC6 votes mainly include modified or new statements. With regard to all statements not modified for the ABC6 consensus, the German experts refer to the published paper of the ABC5 consensus. The German experts base their comments on the current recommendations of the Breast Committee of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, AGO Mamma). Topics: ABC6 focused on new treatment options and their implications for clinical practice. Optimal therapy sequencing for example was one of the issues. To solve the challenge of a more individualized treatment, precision medicine is fundamental. Oligometastatic disease, brain metastases and adequate supportive and palliative care were also addressed. Of special interest was the treatment of inoperable locally advanced breast cancer, which was discussed as a separate topic. As in previous years, patient advocates from around the world were an integral part of the ABC6 conference and had a major input into the consensus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Integrative medicine is becoming increasingly relevant to modern oncology. The present study aims to assess the demand for integrative therapeutic approaches including complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), body and mind practices, nutritional counseling, and psychological assistance among breast and gynecological cancer patients. Methods: From April to July 2017, a pseudo-anonymous questionnaire was distributed to cancer patients at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technical University of Munich. Patterns of CAM use and demand for integrative health approaches were investigated by generating descriptive statistics. Results: 182 (90%) of 203 patients participated in the survey. 59% indicated the use of CAM practices in general, and 41% specifically in relation to their oncological disease. Most frequently used modalities were herbal supplements (32%), homeopathy (29%), vitamins (28%), and selenium (21%). Integrative health approaches that patients would have desired alongside conventional oncological treatment were CAM (54%), relaxation therapies (44%), and dietary counseling (43%). Conclusion: There is a considerable demand for integrative medicine among breast and gynecological cancer patients. Our results underline the need for the implementation of evidence-based integrative treatments in cancer care in order to meet the standards of modern oncology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the 2016 update from the Breast Committee of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) on the recommendations for the treatment and diagnosis of patients who suffered from metastatic and advanced breast cancer.

Background: The Patient's Anastrozole Compliance to Therapy (PACT) program is a large randomized study designed to assess whether the provision of educational materials (EM) could improve compliance with aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal women with early, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Patients and Methods: The PACT study presented a large, homogeneous dataset. The baseline analysis included patient demographics and initial treatments and patient perceptions about treatment and quality of life. Results: Overall, 4,923 patients were enrolled at 109 German breast cancer centers/clinics in cooperation with 1,361 office-based gynecologists/oncologists. 4,844 women were randomized 1:1 to standard therapy (n = 2,402) or standard therapy plus EM (n = 2,442). Prior breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy had been received by 76% and 24% of the patients, respectively. Radiotherapy was scheduled for 85% of the patients, adjuvant chemotherapy for 38%. Reflecting the postmenopausal, hormone-sensitive nature of this population, only 285 patients (7%) had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: A comparison with epidemiological data from the West German Breast Center suggests that the patients in the PACT study are representative of a general postmenopausal early breast cancer population and that the findings may be applicable to 'real-world' Germany and beyond. Compliance data from PACT are eagerly anticipated. Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Few studies have assessed the quality of medical care in breast cancer patients outside clinical studies and certified centres in German-speaking countries. We used ONkeyLINE, a voluntary tumour registry, to evaluate the rate of adoption into clinical practice of guidelines on the adjuvant use of trastuzumab and to estimate the reliability of ONkeyLINE in assessing quality of care. Material and Methods: Data from ONkeyLINE were analysed to answer questions on the quality of breast cancer care in daily practice in 2007. The influence of age and area (rural/urban) on treatment patterns was also evaluated. Results: Data from approximately 85% of patients diagnosed with breast cancer in Lower Saxony in 2007 were documented in ONkeyLINE. Within 1 year, more than 77% of patients received adjuvant trastuzumab according to the updated guidelines. Variations in chemotherapy and trastuzumab according to age were evident, in part but not fully attributable to comorbidities in the elderly. Access to trastuzumab therapy in rural areas was as high as in urban areas. Conclusions: Adoption of national guidelines into clinical practice was observed at a reasonable but still unsatisfactory rate in Lower Saxony. Although voluntary, ONkeyLINE covered most breast cancer cases and proved to be a reliable tool for assessing quality of care. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]