Search

This paper reports finding from a nested qualitative study designed to elicit the views and perceptions of those who participated in a randomised controlled feasibility trial testing a non-pharmacological intervention, Respiratory Distress Symptom Intervention (RDSI), for the management of the breathlessness-cough-fatigue symptom cluster in lung cancer. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 lung cancer patients, three caregivers and seven researchers involved in recruitment, consent, RDSI training and delivery and participant follow-up. Thematic analysis identified key considerations including: the importance of informed consent emphasising commitment to completion of paperwork and raising awareness of potential sensitivities relating to content of questionnaires; ensuring screening for the presence of symptoms reflects the language used by patients; appreciation of the commitment required from participants to learn intervention techniques and embed them as part of everyday life; conduct of interviews with patients who decline to participate; and conduct of serial interviews with those receiving RDSI to further inform its routine implementation into clinical practice. This study will inform the development of a fully powered follow-on trial testing the hypothesis that RDSI plus usual care is superior to usual care alone in the effective management of this symptom cluster in lung cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of Value‐Based Healthcare principles for lung cancer patients in a large Belgian hospital. This hospital implemented a digital platform for the collection of patient‐reported outcomes and the standardisation of care pathways. Also, a follow‐up by the multidisciplinary care team was put in place. Methods: Evaluation was done by employing a mixed method approach with data analysis of all included patients (n = 201), a pilot study (n = 30) and semi‐structured interviews with the care team (n = 5). Results: Overall, 95% of all lung cancer patients of two thoracic oncologists agreed to participate in the digital follow‐up during the period January 2018 to September 2020 (201 participating patients). The response rates of those patients were high: 92% of the weekly questionnaires and 90% of the 6‐weekly ICHOM questionnaires were responded. Based on the pilot study, we conclude that questions are clear and the platform is user‐friendly for 90% of patients in the pilot. The interviews revealed that the weekly follow‐up has a positive impact on the patient–provider communication and makes it easier to discuss psychological and palliative care needs. Conclusion: This study shows a successful implementation of Value Based Healthcare with weekly digital follow‐up. Clinical trial registration is as follows: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04712149. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Measuring the quality of life in family caregivers of people in palliative care is essential to document the impact of care on the caregiver. This study aimed to adapt and validate a Latin American‐Spanish version of the QOLLTI‐F scale in family caregivers of palliative care patients. This study was conducted between May and November 2019 in Medellin, Colombia. We develop three phases: translation and semantic adaptation (n = 17), face and content validity (n = 21), construct validity, internal consistency (n = 208) and test–retest reliability (n = 35). Main family caregivers of stage‐IV cancer patients receiving palliative treatment, participated. In the translation and semantic adaptation, some items were adjusted following the caregivers' recommendations. In face validity, Fleiss' Kappa was over 0.65 for family caregivers. In content validity, Fleiss' Kappa ranged from 0.54 to 1 for experts. In construct validity, the original version seven‐factor structure did not show appropriate model fit indices. The data revealed instead a new 3‐factor structure related to (1) impact of care‐giving, (2) social and healthcare interactions and (3) meaning of life. Cronbach's alpha was 0.83 for the overall scale. Test–retest reliability was 0.87 between measurements 1 and 2. This study found that The Latin American‐Spanish version of the QOLLTI‐F scale is an understandable, useful, and relevant tool for family caregivers of people with cancer receiving palliative care. Future research is needed to confirm the factor structure identified in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) uses videoconferencing technology to support and train healthcare professionals (HCPs) remotely. A 4‐month fortnightly ECHO programme was developed and implemented to enhance palliative care provision by primary care therapists. Teaching and case‐based discussions were facilitated by palliative care specialists. A mixed‐methods cohort study was used to evaluate the project. ECHO participants completed pre‐ and post‐programme questionnaires regarding their knowledge and skills across key palliative care domains. Focus groups were held before programme commencement to explore participants' attitudes and experiences of palliative care and after programme conclusion to explore their experiences of ECHO. Twenty‐six primary care HCPs commenced the ECHO programme. Mean scores in self‐rated confidence in knowledge and skill improved significantly (p <.002) following the programme. Twenty‐one primary care HCPs completed the post‐ECHO surveys and scores of self‐rated confidence in knowledge and skills were significantly higher than pre‐ECHO scores. Ninety‐five percent of participants (n = 19) reported ECHO met their learning needs and was an effective format to enhance clinical knowledge. Eighty‐five percent of participants (n = 17) would recommend ECHO to their colleagues. Project ECHO improved palliative care knowledge and skills of primary care HCPs in Ireland, with potential to address the growing need for integrated palliative care services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Palliative care patients who live alone report greater psychological distress, and are less likely to die at home than those living with a family carer. However, there is a lack of research on the value of models of care that specifically address this disadvantage. This article describes the experiences of terminally ill 'home alone' people using one of two models of care aimed at maintaining participants' need for independent living, focusing on the effect of these two models of care on their physical, social and emotional needs. Twenty six palliative care patients of Silver Chain Hospice Care, in Western Australia, were randomly assigned to either having a personal alarm or additional care-aide hours in their home. An in-depth qualitative study was conducted in two phases in 2010 using face-to-face interviews. The care-aide model of care resulted in benefits such as easing the burden of everyday living; supporting well-being; enhancing quality of life and preserving a sense of dignity; and reducing loneliness and isolation. The personal alarm model of care imparted a sense of security; provided peace of mind; and helped to deal with feelings of isolation. Participants in both groups felt that they could remain at home longer. By providing a safer, more secure environment through the use of a personal alarm or additional care-aide hours, patients were able to continue their activities of daily living, could build a sense of 'normality' into their lives, and they could live independently through support and dignity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]