Search

The Heart Failure (HF) Meta-score may be useful in predicting prognosis in patients with primary prevention cardiac resynchronization defibrillators (CRT-D) considering the competing risk of appropriate defibrillator shock versus mortality. Data from 648 consecutive patients from two centers were used for the evaluation of the performance of the HF Meta-score. The primary endpoint was mortality and the secondary endpoint was time to first appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock or death without prior appropriate ICD shock. Fine-Gray model was used for competing risk regression analysis. In the entire cohort, 237 patients died over a median follow-up of 5.2 years. Five-year cumulative incidence of mortality ranged from 12% to 53%, for quintiles 1 through 5 of the HF Meta-score, respectively (log-rank P < 0.001). Compared with the lowest quintile, mortality risk was higher in the highest quintile (HR 6.9; 95%CI 3.7–12.8). The HF Meta-score had excellent calibration, accuracy, and good discrimination in predicting mortality (C -statistic 0.76 at 1-year and 0.71 at 5-year). The risk of death without appropriate ICD shock was higher in risk quintile 5 compared to quintile 1 (sub HR 5.8; 95%CI 3.1–11.0, P < 0.001). Our study demonstrated a good ability of the HF Meta-score to predict survival in HF patients treated with CRT-D as primary prevention. The HF Meta-score proved to be useful in identifying a subgroup with a significantly poor prognosis despite a CRT-D. • The Heart Failure Meta-score reliably predicts survival in patients who received a CRT-D as primary prevention of SCD. • The Heart Failure Meta-score is able to discriminate between patients with a low or high risk for mortality • The majority of patients died without experiencing an appropriate ICD shock • The Heart Failure Meta-score can be used to identify a subgroup with a significantly poor prognosis despite a CRT-D [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current guidelines have indicated an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for patients with severe idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, for both primary and secondary prevention. Compared to coronary artery disease, the overall benefit has been smaller. A more refined risk assessment, using the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and prevention mode (primary/secondary), is still needed to guide ICD implantation. Patients included in 2 large ICD registers were analyzed regarding the appropriate therapies and improvement of LVEF, overall and in subgroups of prevention mode and LVEF <20% versus >20%. Overall, 349 patients were included; 70% were men, the mean age was 54 years, and the mean follow-up was 33 months. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was used in 57%, and secondary prevention was present in 30%. ICD therapies were delivered to 33% of the patients, in most for ventricular tachycardia. Patients receiving an ICD for secondary prevention and non-CRT were more likely to have arrhythmic events (both p <0.05). The cumulative event rates at 5 years were 53% for secondary and 33% for primary prevention (p <0.001). Depending on the prevention mode and LVEF status (<20% vs >20%), the event rates ranged from 30% to 76%. The mean LVEF improved by 10%, independently of the stimulation mode (CRT 22% to 31%, non-CRT 26% to 35%; p <0.0001). A persistent improvement to >35% was seen in only 25% of CRT patients but in 45% of non-CRT patients (p = 0.004). In conclusion, the results from the present study have demonstrated that in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, the potential for LVEF improvement is considerable and that the rate of ICD interventions strongly depends on the prevention mode and LVEF. These findings could be the basis for additional risk stratification tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Even though current guidelines suggest the use of VDD pacemakers in patients with AV block and normal sinus node function, a DDD system is often preferred for fear of either long-term atrial undersensing or late sinus node dysfunction and the resultant need for system upgrades. Methods: We evaluated the long-term follow-up of all VDD pacemakers implanted in our center between 1992 and 2001 regarding atrial sensing, maintenance of AV synchrony, incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF), or the need for system upgrade, respectively. Results: 320 consecutive patients (56% men, age 75±13 years) received a VDD pacemaker for the following indications: third-degree AV block 54%, second-degree AV block 34%, fascicular block with first-degree AV block and syncope 6%, others 6%. 138 patients (43%) died during follow-up, 3.8±2.3 years after implantation. Follow-up duration was 6.1±2.5 years in the remaining patients. At the last follow-up, 268 pacemakers (84%) were programmed to the VDD mode, 47 pacemakers (15%) were permanently programmed to the VVI mode (AF 36, undersensing 7, others 4, respectively). In five patients a DDD upgrade was necessary for sinus node dysfunction (3) or lead defect (2). Lead revision was performed in 19 patients (6%) (ventricular lead dislocation 7, atrial undersensing 6, lead fracture 3, others 2, respectively). Conclusion: VDD pacemakers have an excellent long-term performance in patients with AV block. They have a very low incidence of lead revisions for atrial undersensing (2%) and DDD upgrades for secondary sinus node dysfunction (1%). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: The value of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is unclear, as randomized trials could not show a survival benefit compared to drug therapy. It has not been investigated if patients with a very poor left ventricular function (LVEF) could profit from an ICD. Methods: Consecutive patients with DCM who received an ICD between December 1996 and November 2003 were included in this analysis. Patients were divided in group A (secondary prevention) and group B (primary prevention). Both groups were stratified in subgroups with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below and above 20%. Results: Fifty eight patients were included (male 50, age 56.4±12.7 years). Follow-up was 34±19 months. There was no difference regarding death (18% vs. 11%), but significant differences (p value <0.05) regarding any adverse events (55% vs. 22%), any ICD intervention (48% vs. 17%) and ICD interventions for life-threatening arrhythmias (27% vs. 0%) between group A and B. LVEF was not predictive for events in group A, whereas in group B only patients with a LVEF <20% had events (p value 0.02). Over time there was an increase of the LVEF of more than 15% determined by echocardiography in 36% of patients, significantly more often in group B. Conclusions: Indication for primary prevention with an ICD in DCM should be made with caution. Larger studies are needed to determine if patients with LVEF of <20% might benefit from an ICD. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: A case of a professional ice-hockey with a blunt chest trauma is presented. A year after the first cardiac evaluation, he experienced sustained ventricular tachycardia after another slight chest trauma. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted. The pathophysiological background of tachycardias after a blunt chest trauma and its management are discussed. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) is a validated multivariate risk prediction model for mortality in patients with heart failure, using widely available clinical variables. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the SHFM when applied to patients with heart failure who received cardiac resynchronization therapy devices with defibrillation. A total of 413 patients were identified from 2 prospective implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registries who received cardiac resynchronization therapy devices with defibrillation for the primary prevention of sudden death. Baseline laboratory and clinical data were entered in the SHFM to calculate predicted survival. The end point was all-cause mortality. During a median follow-up period of 2.8 years, 78 patients died and 9 underwent heart transplantation. Observed versus predicted 5-year mortality rates were 11.6% versus 11.4%, 21.5% versus 22.1%, and 41.4% versus 46.1% by ascending tertile of Seattle Heart Failure Score, respectively. No systematic or substantial errors of risk estimation were observed. Discrimination was excellent; the C-statistic ranged from 0.78 at 1-year follow-up to 0.70 at 5-year follow-up, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square statistic was 0.87 (p = 0.65). In conclusion, in patients with heart failure who received cardiac resynchronization therapy devices with defibrillation, the SHFM offers adequate discrimination of risk for all-cause mortality and estimation of mortality risk without substantial or systematic errors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background Although radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) based technologies for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have both individually been demonstrated to be effective and safe for the treatment of paroxysmal AF, head-to-head comparisons are lacking. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Methods Out of a prospective registry of 327 patients undergoing PVI, 208 patients (age 58 ± 11 years, ejection fraction 59 ± 6%, left atrial size 39 ± 6 mm) with paroxysmal AF were identified. The presented dataset was obtained by 1:1 propensity score matching and contained 142 patients undergoing CB-PVI or RF-PVI in conjunction with a 3D mapping system, respectively. We compared single procedure efficacy of the two methods using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results After a mean follow-up of 28 months and a single procedure, AF recurred in 37 of 71 (52%) in the CB-PVI group and in 31 of 71 patients (44%) in the RF-PVI group (HR [95% CI] = 1.19 [0.74, 1.92], p = 0.48). Recurrence of AF for PVI using solely the CB was observed in 23 of 51 (45%) patients and in 23 of 51 (45%) patients in the corresponding RF-PVI group (HR [95% CI] = 0.93 [0.52, 1.66], p = 0.81). Complication rate was not different between the groups. Conclusion A propensity score matched comparison between CB-PVI and RF-PVI using a 3D-mapping system for AF ablation showed similar long-term success rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study sought to determine the clinical course and predictors of long-term outcome in patients with documented amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT). Background: Amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis is a condition that is difficult to manage, in particular because of the long half-life of amiodarone. Data on optimal treatment for AIT are scarce. Methods: We performed a retrospective review among patients with documented AIT at a tertiary care center. Baseline characteristics, treatment received, laboratory parameters, and events during follow-up were evaluated. The predefined composite end point consisted of the following AIT-associated complications: death, heart transplantation, hospitalization for heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for arrhythmia management, or hospitalization for treatment complications. Results: Eighty-four patients were included in the present analysis; 27 patients received prednisone for AIT. There was no difference in time to normalization of free thyroxine between those receiving and those not receiving prednisone. Long-term follow-up showed high morbidity and mortality; 47 patients (56%) reached the primary end point. Patients receiving prednisone had a worse outcome than those not receiving prednisone (p = 0.003). Although patients received prednisone for 84 ± 65 days, curves started to separate only 12 months after the initial diagnosis. Conclusions: Patients with AIT have a high event rate during follow-up. Prednisone had no effect on time to normalization of thyroxine levels and was associated with an increased event rate. Importantly, AIT-related problems must be expected late, at a time when thyroid function is under control. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: We aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects of right-atrial-paced (DDD) and right-atrial-sensed (VDD) biventricular paced rhythm on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves hemodynamics in patients with severe heart failure and left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. However, the impact of active right atrial pacing on resynchronization therapy is unknown. Methods: Seventeen CRT patients were studied 10 months (range: 1 to 46 months) after implantation. At baseline, the programmed atrioventricular delay was optimized by timing LV contraction properly at the end of atrial contraction. In both modes the acute hemodynamic effects were assessed by multiple Doppler echocardiographic parameters. Results: Compared to DDD pacing, VDD pacing resulted in much better improvement of intraventricular dyssynchrony assessed by the septal-to-posterior wall motion delay (VDD 106 ± 83 ms vs. DDD 145 ± 95 ms; p = 0.001), whereas the interventricular mechanical delay (difference between onset of pulmonary and aortic outflow) did not differ (VDD 20 ± 21 ms vs. DDD 18 ± 17 ms; p = NS). Furthermore, VDD pacing significantly prolonged the rate-corrected LV filling period (VDD 458 ± 123 ms vs. DDD 371 ± 94 ms; p = 0.0001) and improved the myocardial performance index (VDD 0.60 ± 0.18 vs. DDD 0.71 ± 0.23; p &#60; 0.01). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that avoidance of right atrial pacing results in a higher degree of LV resynchronization, in a substantial prolongation of the LV filling period, and in an improved myocardial performance. Thus, the VDD mode seems to be superior to the DDD mode in CRT patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to quantify daytime symptoms in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with and without sleep related breathing disorders (SRBD). Background: SRBD are common in patients with AF but little is known about daytime symptoms among those with SRBD. Methods: Patients with AF admitted to clinics of two tertiary referral hospitals for a variety of different cardiovascular diseases were screened with a trans-nasal airflow measurement device allowing measurement of the apnea–hypopnea-index. Data on cardiac risk factors, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and cardiac medication were collected. Presence of SRBD was defined as an AHI≥15/h. The Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) was used to quantify daytime symptoms. Results: Of 102 screened patients 8 were excluded due to device malfunction (n=1), dislocation of nasal cannula (n=6), or hyperthyroidism (n=1). Among the remaining 94 patients, 40 (43%) were diagnosed with SRBD. Patients with and without SRBD had similar age, body mass index, LVEF and cardiac medication. The prevalence of coronary artery disease was higher in patients with SRBD than in those without (50 vs. 17%; p=0.0007). ESS score was low and similar in both groups (no SRBD: median 4, interquartile range (IQR) 2–4 vs. SRBD: 5, IQR 3–8; p=0.14). Only 6/40 (5%) of the patients underwent overnight polysomnography and 2 (5%) started CPAP ventilation during follow-up. Conclusions: Even though SRBD are common in patients with AF, the prevalence of daytime symptoms is rare. Consequently, most patients will not initiate CPAP ventilation after positive SRBD screening. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]