Search

Abstract: In bedside testing of patients with hemispatial neglect, we have found that extinction for contralesional stimuli is less when the contralesional and ipsilesional items are different on the dimension to be reported relative to when they are the same. Importantly, a study that investigated this observation found that similarity on visual features that are not necessary for response does not impact the amount of extinction. These findings suggest that response requirements may determine what stimuli will and what stimuli will not gain access to awareness. In a related study, we found that extinction of contralesional stimuli was not determined by perceptual similarity of the ipsilesional and contralesional items but by whether they shared the same semantics (e.g., ONE + 1 ) or the same response (e.g., ONE = WON). Here, we report a single case study in which extinction was determined by whether the competing items shared the same response, regardless of whether they shared or differed in their visual features or semantics. When asked to read the item in each field, there was equivalent extinction in the conditions (ONE + ONE) and (ONE + 1) but less extinction in the condition (ONE + TWO). By contrast, when asked to count the number of characters in each field, there was more extinction in the condition (ONE + TWO) than (ONE + 1). When asked to categorize each item as either a word or digit, the degree of extinction was determined both by whether the items shared the same semantics and by whether they required the same response. The results are consistent with a biased competition model in which competition for selection is resolved flexibly depending on response requirements. Furthermore, the data provide evidence that unattended stimuli are processed to the level of response. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Patients with right hemisphere brain lesions often suffer from deficits in spatial attention that can be manifested in different sensory modalities. It has recently been claimed that a relationship (i.e., association) could exist between symptoms of hemi-inattention in different modalities, based on correlations between the results of visual and auditory clinical tests of neglect or extinction. However, it should be noted that the visual and auditory tasks varied greatly both in response type and level of sensitivity. Here, we have examined cross-modal associations in spatial attention deficits using a temporal order judgment task (TOJ) in which patients were required to identify which of two visual or auditory objects had appeared first. When compared to age and education matched control participants, the patients needed, on average, the contralesional stimulus to lead the ipsilesional stimulus to achieve the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS). No association between the degree of visual and auditory hemi-inattention was observed amongst the patients, suggesting that there is a certain degree of independence between the mechanisms subserving spatial attention across sensory modalities. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]