Search

Background Uncontrolled infections are known to be an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation; however, the posttransplant prognosis of recipients treated for pretransplant infection is unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze pretransplant infections among liver transplant recipients and to determine their impact on posttransplant clinical outcomes. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed 357 subjects who had undergone living-donor liver transplantation between January 2008 and May 2014. Results Among 357 recipients, 71 patients (19.8%) had 74 episodes of infectious complications before liver transplantation. These complications consisted of pneumonia (n = 13), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (n = 12), catheter-related infection (n = 10), urinary tract infection (n = 12), biliary tract infection (n = 6), and skin and soft-tissue infection (n = 3). Twenty-six patients experienced 29 episodes of bacteremia, and the most common pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 8), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 7), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 4), and Streptococcus species (n = 3). Twenty-one bacteremic episodes (70%) occurred within 1 month before transplantation (n = 4). Recipients with pretransplant infections had significantly more frequent posttransplant infections (71.8% [51 of 71] vs 47.2% [35 of 286]; P = .0001), posttransplant bacteremia (33.8% [24 of 71] vs 20.3% [58 of 286]; P = .015), and longer posttransplant intensive care unit stays (11.2 ± 10.7 days vs 7.3 ± 4.2 days; P = .0004) than those without pretransplant infections. However, episodes of rejection ( P = .36), length of hospitalization ( P = .10), 28-day mortality ( P = .31), and 1-year mortality ( P = .61) after transplantation were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Conclusions Pretransplant infection had an impact on posttransplant morbidity, although not on rejection and mortality. Alertness for posttransplant infection and proper management (including effective antimicrobial coverage) would improve patient morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Acinetobacter baumannii has become an increasingly important nosocomial pathogen. Carbapenem is the preferred drug of choice for treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli, but carbapenem-resistant A baumannii (CRAB) has now emerged. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, outcomes, and risk factors for CRAB bacteremia in liver transplant recipients. Methods The medical records of 393 subjects who underwent living donor liver transplant at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital from January 2008 to April 2015 were reviewed. Results A total of 92 (23.4%) bacteremic patients, comprising 156 episodes, were identified. Fourteen patients, totaling 18 episodes, had CRAB bacteremia. The median time of emergence of CRAB bacteremia was 55.5 (range, 2–829) days after transplantation, and 72.2% of episodes (n = 13) occurred within 6 months of transplant. The presumed sources of infection were intra-abdominal (n = 11, 61.1%), biliary tract (n = 3, 16.7%), lung (n = 2, 11.1%), catheter (n = 1, 5.6%), and wound (n = 1, 5.6%). By multivariate analysis, length of post-transplant intensive care unit (ICU) stay (odds ratio [OR], 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11–1.15; P = .04) was associated with CRAB bacteremia. Overall mortality in 14 recipients with CRAB bacteremia was 50% (n = 7), but only 10% (30 of 301) in non-bacteremic patients and 20.5% (16 of 78) in other bacteremic patients excluding CRAB ( P < .001). Conclusion In our study, patients with CRAB bacteremia after liver transplant showed an unfavorable outcome and, recently, CRAB has become an increasingly major pathogen at our center. Reducing the length of ICU stay could be a solution for preventing CRAB bacteremia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Routine microbiologic surveillance is a method of infection control, but its clinical significance in transplant recipients is not known. We analyzed microbiologic data to evaluate the influence of cultured microorganisms between the point of surveillance and infectious episodes in liver transplant recipients. Methods: We performed surveillance culture for sputum and peritoneal fluid in liver transplant recipients from January 2009 to December 2011, at the time of transplantation (T1), 5 days (T2), and 10 days (T3) postoperatively. Results: Of the 179 recipients, 32.9% had a positive sputum culture result and 37.4% had a positive peritoneal culture result during surveillance. In the culture surveillance of sputum, 37 organisms were isolated from 35 recipients at T1, and the most common organism was Staphylococcus aureus (n = 13). At T2, 45 organisms were isolated from 39 recipients, including Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 10), S aureus (n = 8), and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 6). At T3, 18 organisms were isolated from 15 patients, including Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 5) and K pneumonia (n = 4). In the peritoneal fluid, 11 organisms were isolated from 10 recipients at T1, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2) and Enterococcus species (n = 2). At T2, 39 organisms were isolated from 36 recipients, including coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species (CNS; n = 8) and Enterococcus species (n = 7). At T3, 54 organisms were isolated from 51 recipients, including CNS (n = 17) and Candida species (n = 8). Among the 59 patients with positive culture results for sputum surveillance, 16.9% developed pneumonia caused by the same organisms. Among the 67 patients with positive peritoneal fluid culture, 16.4% developed an intra-abdominal infection caused by the same organisms cultured. The recipients with positive surveillance culture had a higher risk of pneumonia (20.3% [12/59] vs 1.6% [2/120]; P < .001) and intra-abdominal infection (31.3% [21/67] vs 18.7% [21/112]; P = .05). Conclusions: Periodic microbiologic surveillance may be useful in the prediction of post-transplantation pneumonia and intra-abdominal infection and could offer a potential target for empirical antimicrobial therapy in cases of infection. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]