Search

Identification of fibrosis in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) relies on symptom assessment and endoscopy. Symptoms are highly variable, and early fibrotic remodeling may go undetected on endoscopy yet contribute to esophageal dysfunction. We aimed to assess whether esophageal distensibility has utility in defining fibrostenotic severity in a cohort of pediatric patients with EoE with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. We analyzed a prospectively recruited a cohort of children ages 9 to 21 years undergoing upper endoscopy and Endoscopic Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP) for suspected or previously diagnosed EoE. Esophageal distensibility was evaluated by the distensibility index (DI) and esophageal diameter at the distensibility plateau. The association of esophageal distensibility to clinical, endoscopic, and histologic parameters of disease severity was assessed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the utility of distensibility in defining esophageal rigidity in pediatric EoE. We identified 59 pediatric patients with EoE undergoing endoscopy and EndoFLIP at a single pediatric tertiary referral center. DI (mm2/mmHg) was significantly lower in patients with fibrotic as compared with inflammatory features on endoscopy (median, 3.3; interquartile range, 2.3–4.4) vs median, 5.5; interquartile range, 4.1–6.0; P =.02) and showed no correlation with eosinophil count. DI <4.5 mm2/mmHg predicted grade 2 rings on endoscopy with area under the curve of 0.81 (P =.0004). DI predicted food impaction in both unadjusted and adjusted models (fully adjusted odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–2.14; P =.0486). Esophageal distensibility determined by EndoFLIP is a measure of fibrostenotic severity that can be used to clinically phenotype pediatric EoE. We propose parameters of DI <4.5 mm2/mmHg for defining esophageal rigidity in pediatric patients with EoE ages 9 years and older. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cow's milk protein (CMP) is the most common trigger of inflammation in children and adults with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We sought to assess the clinical, endoscopic, and histologic efficacy of dietary elimination of all CMP-containing foods in EoE. We performed a prospective observational study in children with EoE treated with the 1-food elimination diet (1FED), excluding all CMP. Children and their caretakers were educated by a registered dietitian regarding dietary elimination of all CMP-containing foods, with substitutions to meet nutritional needs for optimal growth and development, and daily meal planning. Upper endoscopy with biopsies was performed after 8 to 12 weeks of treatment. The primary end point was histologic remission, defined as fewer than 15 eosinophils per high-power field. Secondary end points were symptomatic, endoscopic, and quality-of-life (QOL) improvements. Forty-one children (76% male; ages, 9 ± 4 years; 88% white) underwent 1FED education and post-treatment endoscopy with biopsies. Histologic remission occurred in 21 (51%) children, with a decrease in peak eosinophils per high-power field from a median of 50 (interquartile range, 35–70) to a median of 1 (interquartile range, 0–6; P <.0001). Endoscopic abnormalities improved in 24 (59%) patients, while symptoms improved in 25 (61%). Improved symptoms included chest pain, dysphagia, and pocketing/spitting out food. Parents perceived worse QOL, while children perceived improved QOL with the 1FED. One-food elimination of CMP-containing foods from the diet induced histologic remission in more than 50% of children with EoE and led to significant improvement in symptoms and endoscopic abnormalities. The ease of implementation and adherence supports the 1FED as first-line dietary treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: To systematically evaluate the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE). Methods: A retrospective review of 657 patients seen at the EE center of a tertiary care children''s hospital between 1994 and 2007 was performed. Charts were reviewed for the 144 patients who were also seen by the otolaryngology service. Results: One hundred forty-four patients received 193 otolaryngology-related diagnoses. Eustachian tube dysfunction (27.5%) and sleep disordered breathing (24.9%) were the most common, followed by dysphagia (13.0%), rhinosinusitis/nasal congestion (9.3%) and airway stenosis (5.2%). Seventy-nine patients (54.9%) had a pre-existing diagnosis of EE at the time of their otolaryngology consultation. Twenty-one patients (14.6%) were referred to the gastroenterology service for evaluation for EE. Forty-four patients (30.5%) remained undiagnosed. Twenty-five of these patients presented with dysphagia, 16 of whom were not previously diagnosed with EE; only 4 of these 16 patients were referred for evaluation for EE. In one case, a child with moderate sized tonsils underwent adenotonsillectomy for dysphagia and failure to thrive; this patient was diagnosed with EE 1 month post-operatively. Conclusions: Twenty percent of patients with EE may require care by an otolaryngologist for a myriad of complaints. Even experienced pediatric otolaryngologists may not recognize this condition. Otolaryngologists should consider EE in patients presenting with dysphagia. A careful gastroenterology review of symptoms may also allow otolaryngologists to identify EE in patients with allergy mediated nasal complaints, or laryngeal/airway disorders. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]