Search

Afforestation is an important mitigation strategy for climate change due to its carbon sequestration potential. Besides this favorable biogeochemical effect on global CO 2 concentrations, afforestation also affects the regional climate by changing the biogeophysical land surface characteristics. In this study, we investigate the effects of an idealized global CO 2 reduction to pre-industrial conditions by a Europe-wide afforestation experiment on the regional longwave radiation balance, starting in the year 1986 on a continent entirely covered with grassland. Results show that the impact of biogeophysical processes on the surface temperatures is much stronger than that of biogeochemical processes. Furthermore, biogeophysically induced changes of the surface temperatures, atmospheric temperatures, and moisture concentrations are as important for the regional longwave radiation balance as the global CO 2 reduction. While the outgoing longwave radiation is increased in winter, it is reduced in summer. In terms of annual total, a Europe-wide afforestation has a regional warming effect despite reduced CO 2 concentrations. Thus, even for an idealized reduction of the global CO 2 concentrations to pre-industrial levels, the European climate response to afforestation would still be dominated by its biogeophysical effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Afforestation is an important mitigation strategy to climate change due to its carbon sequestration potential. Besides this positive biogeochemical effect on global CO2 concentrations, afforestation also affects the regional climate by changing the biogeophysical land surface characteristics. In this study, we investigate the effects of an idealized global CO2 reduction to pre-industrial conditions by a Europe wide afforestation experiment on the regional longwave radiation balance, starting in the year 1986 from a continent entirely covered with grassland. Results show that the impact of biogeophysical processes on the surface temperatures is much stronger than of biogechemical processes. Furthermore, biogeophysically induced changes of the surface temperatures, atmospheric temperatures and moisture concentrations are as important for the regional greenhouse effect as the global CO2 reduction. While the greenhouse effect is strengthened in winter, it is weakened in summer. On annual total, a Europe-wide afforestation has a regional warming effect, despite reduced CO2 concentrations. Thus, even for an idealized reduction of the global CO2 concentrations to pre-industrial levels, the European climate response to afforestation would still be dominated by its biogeophysical effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent climate change mitigation strategies rely on the reduction of methane (CH 4) emissions. Carbon and hydrogen isotope ratio (δ13 C CH4 and δ2 H CH4) measurements can be used to distinguish sources and thus to understand the CH 4 budget better. The CH 4 emission estimates by models are sensitive to the isotopic signatures assigned to each source category, so it is important to provide representative estimates of the different CH 4 source isotopic signatures worldwide. We present new measurements of isotope signatures of various, mainly anthropogenic, CH 4 sources in Europe, which represent a substantial contribution to the global dataset of source isotopic measurements from the literature, especially for δ2 H CH4. They improve the definition of δ13 C CH4 from waste sources, and demonstrate the use of δ2 H CH4 for fossil fuel source attribution. We combined our new measurements with the last published database of CH 4 isotopic signatures and with additional literature, and present a new global database. We found that microbial sources are generally well characterised. The large variability in fossil fuel isotopic compositions requires particular care in the choice of weighting criteria for the calculation of a representative global value. The global dataset could be further improved by measurements from African, South American, and Asian countries, and more measurements from pyrogenic sources. We improved the source characterisation of CH 4 emissions using stable isotopes and associated uncertainty, to be used in top-down studies. We emphasise that an appropriate use of the database requires the analysis of specific parameters in relation to source type and the region of interest. The final version of the European CH 4 isotope database coupled with a global inventory of fossil and non-fossil δ13 C CH4 and δ2 H CH4 source signature measurements is available at 10.24416/UU01-YP43IN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent climate change mitigation strategies rely on the reduction of methane (CH4) emissions. δ13CCH4 and δ²HCH4 measurements can be used to distinguish sources and thus to understand the CH4 budget better. The CH4 emission estimates by models are sensitive to the isotopic signatures assigned to each source category, so it is important to provide representative estimates of the different CH4 source isotopic signatures worldwide. We present new measurements of isotope signatures of various, mainly anthropogenic, CH4 sources in Europe, which represent a substantial contribution to the global dataset of source isotopic measurements from the literature, especially for δ²HCH4. They improve the definition of δ13CCH4 from waste sources, and demonstrate the use of δ²HCH4 for fossil fuel source attribution. Results from previous studies were combined in a common database that we updated with our new measurements, as well as with additional literature. We found that microbial sources are generally well characterised. The large variability in fossil fuels isotopic compositions requires particular care in the choice of weighting criteria for the calculation of a representative global value. The global dataset could be further improved by measurements from African, South American and Asian countries, as well as more measurements from pyrogenic sources. The final version of the European methane isotope database coupled with a global inventory of fossil and non-fossil δ13CCH4 and δ²HCH4 source signature measurements, is available at: https://doi.org/10.24416/UU01-4PO56T (Menoud et al., 2021a). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Solar photovoltaics (PV) plays an essential role in decarbonizing the European energy system. However, climate change affects surface solar radiation and will therefore directly influence future PV power generation. We use scenarios from Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) for a mitigation (SSP1-2.6) and a fossil-fuel-dependent (SSP5-8.5) pathway in order to quantify climate risk for solar PV in Europe as simulated by the Global Solar Energy Estimator (GSEE). We find that PV potential increases by around 5 % in the mitigation scenario, suggesting a positive feedback loop between climate change mitigation and PV potential. While increased clear-sky radiation and reduced cloud cover go hand in hand in SSP1-2.6, the effect of a decrease in clear-sky radiation is outweighed by a decrease in cloud cover in SSP5-8.5, resulting in an increase in all-sky radiation. Moreover, we find that the seasonal cycle of PV generation changes in most places, as generation grows more strongly in winter than in summer (SSP1-2.6) or increases in summer and declines in winter (SSP5-8.5). We further analyze climate change impacts on the spatial variability of PV power generation. Similar to the effects anticipated for wind energy, we report an increase in the spatial correlations of daily PV production with large inter-model agreement yet relatively small amplitude, implying that PV power balancing between different regions in continental Europe will become more difficult in the future. Thus, based on the most recent climate simulations, this research supports the notion that climate change will only marginally impact renewable energy potential, while changes in the spatiotemporal generation structure are to be expected and should be included in power system design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Solar photovoltaics (PV) plays an essential role in decarbonizing the European energy system. However, climate change affects surface solar radiation and thereby will directly influence future PV power generation. We use scenarios from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) for a mitigation (SSP1-2.6) and a fossil-fuel dependent (SSP5-8.5) pathway, to quantify climate risk for solar PV in Europe simulated by the Global Solar Energy Estimator (GSEE). We find that PV potential increases by around 5 % in the mitigation scenario, suggesting a positive feedback loop between climate change mitigation and PV potential. While increased clear-sky radiation and reduced cloud cover go hand in hand in SSP1-2.6, a decrease in clear-sky radiation is overcompensated by a decrease in cloud cover in SSP5-8.5, resulting in an increase of all-sky radiation. Moreover, we find that the seasonal cycle of PV generation changes in most places as generation grows more strongly in winter than in summer (SSP1-2.6) or increases in summer and declines in winter (SSP5-8.5). We further analyze climate change impacts on the spatial variability of PV power generation. Similar to effects anticipated for wind energy, we report an increase of the spatial correlations of daily PV production with large inter-model agreement yet relatively small amplitude, implying that PV power balancing between different regions in continental Europe will become more difficult in the future. Based on the most recent climate simulations, this research thus supports the notion that climate change will only marginally impact renewable energy potential, while changes in the spatio-temporal generation structure are to be expected and should be included in power system design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the context of the first phase of the Euro-CORDEX Flagship Plot Study (FPS) Land Use and Climate Across Scales (LUCAS), we investigate the afforestation impact on the seasonal cycle of soil temperature over the European continent with an ensemble of ten regional climate models (RCMs). For this purpose, each ensemble member performed two idealized land cover experiments in which Europe is covered either by forests or grasslands. The multi-model mean exhibits a reduction of the annual amplitude of soil temperature (AAST) over all European regions, although this not a robust feature among the models. In Mediterranean, the simulated AAST response to afforestation is between -4 K and +2 K while in Scandinavia the inter-model spread ranges from -7 K to +1 K. We then examine the role of changes in the annual amplitude of ground heat flux (AAGHF) and summer soil moisture content (SMC) in determining the effect of afforestation on AAST response. In contrast with the diverging results in AAST, all the models consistently indicate a widespread AAGHF decrease and summer SMC decline due to afforestation. The AAGHF changes effectively explain the largest part of the inter-model variance in AAST response in most regions, while the changes in summer SMC determine the sign of AAST response within a group of three simulations sharing the same land surface model. Finally, we pair FLUXNET sites to compare the simulated results with observation-based evidence of the impact of forest on soil temperature. In line with models, observations indicate a summer ground cooling in forested areas compared to open lands. The vast majority of models agree with the sign of the observed reduction in AAST, although with a large variation in the magnitude of changes. Overall, we aspire to emphasize the effects of afforestation on soil temperature profile with this study, given that changes in the seasonal cycle of soil temperature potentially perturb crucial biochemical processes. Such perturbations can be of societal relevance as afforestation is proposed as a climate change mitigation strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bioenergy crops are an important source of renewable energy and are a possible mechanism to mitigate global climate warming by replacing energy with higher greenhouse gas emissions. There is, however, uncertainty about potential synergies and trade-offs of increased use of this energy form. This is even more enhanced by the non-predictable climate change currently going on. Energy crops like Miscanthus and Short Rotation Forestry (SRF) or Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) are becoming more and more important and increasingly visible. Integrated into a sustainable whole system of primary use (bioenergy) and secondary use (soil carbon stabilisation and erosion control) in agricultural areas, Miscanthus, Willow and Poplar can be used to mitigate climate change impacts without negative trade-offs. Therefore, policy-relevant scientific data as a basis for future policy decisions is needed. The goal of this project was the development of a sustainable whole system of Miscanthus, Willow and Poplar bioenergy crops in the European agricultural setting. Focus has been on biodiversity, water and air security, erosion control and soil security, GHG emissions and soil C changes compared with the most common agricultural crops (barley, corn maize, winter rapeseed, rice, winter rye, soybean, sunflower, winter wheat, sugar beet, potatoes). The technical distribution potential and likely yield of second-generation energy crops, such as Miscanthus, SRC with willow, and SRF with poplar, was modelled using SalixFOR, PopFOR and MiscanFOR. The results were coupled with EPIC model results about carbon changes and erosion risk, represented by different erosion modelling approaches (e.g. RUSLE, MUSLE, ...). The sustainable whole system can work as a tool to identify areas where Miscanthus, Willow and Poplar bioenergy crops can be used to produce bioenergy without trade-offs for land use change or food security. When properly used, the above-named bioenergy crops can instead be seen as tools for carbon stabilisation and erosion control. Changes in topsoil SOC (0 – 30 cm) under Miscanthus can range from 0 to increases of up to 2000 kg/ha/y. Differences in erosion potential for agricultural crops compared with Miscanthus, Salix and Poplar will be highlighted. For Miscanthus, RUSLE predicts erosion between <0.5 to 20 t/ha/y in Europe. Further, we will show modelled yield maps for Miscanthus, Salix and Poplar in Austria and present constraint/opportunity maps for Europe based on the factors total economic value, technical potential, current land use, erosion and carbon changes, biodiversity and trade-offs and synergies. In this sustainable whole system Miscanthus, Salix and Poplar show their climate change mitigation and adaptation potential. The results can be used for policy-relevant decisions. The data can be used for developing land management practices and reducing impacts from climate change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A transition to a low carbon energy system is needed to respond to global challenge of climate change mitigation. Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage (ATES) is a technology with worldwide potential to provide sustainable space heating and cooling by (seasonal) storage and recovery of heat in the subsurface. However, adoption of ATES varies strongly across Europe, because of both technical as well as organizational barriers, e.g. differences in climatic and subsurface conditions and legislation respectively. After identification of all these barriers in a Climate-KIC research project, six ATES pilot systems have been installed in five different EU-countries aiming to show how such barriers can be overcome. This paper presents the results of the barrier analysis and the results of the pilot plants. The barriers are categorized in general barriers, and barriers for mature and immature markets. Two pilots show how ATES can be successfully used to re-develop contaminated sites by combining ATES with soil remediation. Two other pilots show the added value of ATES because its storage capacity enables the utilization of solar heat in combination with solar power production. Finally, two pilots are realized in countries with legal barriers where ATES systems have not previously been applied at all. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]