Search

The complexity of an animal's physical environment is known to affect the hippocampus. Captivity may affect hippocampal anatomy and this may be attributable to the limited opportunities for memory-based experiences. This has tangential support, in that differential demands on memory can mediate changes in the hippocampus. What remains unclear is whether captivity directly affects hippocampal architecture and whether providing memory-based experiences in captivity can maintain hippocampal attributes comparable to wild-caught conspecifics. Using food-caching mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli), we found that wild-caught individuals had larger hippocampal volumes relative to the rest of the telencephalon than captive birds with or without memory-based food-caching experiences, whereas there were no differences in neuron numbers or telencephalon volume. Also, there were no significant differences in relative hippocampal volume or neuron numbers between the captive birds with or without memory-based experiences. Our results demonstrate that captivity reduces hippocampal volume relative to the remainder of the telencephalon, but not at the expense of neuron numbers. Further, memory-based experiences in captivity may not be sufficient to maintain hippocampal volume comparable to wild-caught counterparts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent work from our laboratory demonstrates that both young and adult rats show a preference for directional responding over place navigation in the Morris water task. Based on these findings, previous studies on the postnatal development of spatial learning have most likely assessed the ontogeny of directional responding instead of true place navigation. Here, we examined the development of directional responding and place navigation among young male and female rats using two variants of the Moms water task that specifically require directional and place responses. In the place variant, the hidden platform remained in the same absolute spatial location regardless of pool position. In the direction variant, the platform remained in the same direction in the room regardless of pool position. We found that ability to solve the direction task emerged around 20 to 21 days of age, whereas ability to solve the place task did not emerge until 26 to 27 days of age. These findings indicate that directional responding and place navigation exhibit different developmental trajectories and suggest that the 2 forms of navigation have different neurobiological bases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]