Search

Introduction: Given the lack of data, we aimed to explore which therapeutic endpoints pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and their parents consider to be relevant. Methods: We created an educational brochure on EoE and a questionnaire, both of which were content-validated by pediatric patients and parents. Validated documents were sent to 112 patients and parents. They ranked the importance (5 levels) of short (during next 3 months) and long-term (≥1 year) treatment effect on symptoms, quality of life, endoscopic inflammation, stricture formation, histological inflammation, and fibrosis. Results: A total of 45 parents and 30 pediatric patients ≥11 years completed the questionnaires. Pediatric patients identified improvement in the following domains as most important in the short- and long-term, respectively: symptoms (73% vs. 77%), QoL (53% vs. 57%), histologic inflammation (47% vs. 50%), histologic fibrosis (40% vs. 33%), endoscopic inflammation (47% vs. 40%), and strictures (33% vs. 40%). Parents of children ≥11 years old classified improvement in the following domains as most important in the short- and long-term, respectively: symptoms (70% vs. 83%), QoL (63% vs. 80%), histologic inflammation (67% vs. 77%), histologic fibrosis (47% vs. 63%), endoscopic inflammation (77% vs. 80%), and strictures (40% vs. 53%). Agreement between caregiver and children on the short-term importance of treatment outcomes was as follows: symptoms (77%), QoL (40%), histologic inflammation and fibrosis (47% and 43%), endoscopic inflammation and strictures (50% and 40%). Conclusion: Pediatric patients and parents attributed most importance to improvement in symptoms and QoL. Agreement between parents and patients regarding therapy goals is limited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: It is still unknown whether eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) patients with localized disease are different from those with extended disease. Methods: We evaluated prospectively included patients in the Swiss EoE cohort. Data on all patients with active disease at baseline, no concomitant gastroesophageal reflux disease, no strictures at baseline, and at least one follow-up visit were analyzed. We compared patients with histologically localized proximal versus distal versus extended (=proximal and distal) disease with regard to patient, disease characteristics, disease presentation, and development of complications. Results: We included 124 patients with a median of 2.5 years of follow-up (73.4% males, median age 35.0 years). Ten patients had proximal (8.1%), 46 patients had distal (37.1%), and 68 patients had extended disease (54.8%). Patients with proximal disease were significantly more often females (80%) compared with patients with distal (26.1%, p = 0.002) or extended disease (19.1%, p < 0.001) and reported less severe symptoms (VAS 0 vs. VAS 1, p = 0.001). Endoscopic and histological disease was less pronounced in the proximal esophagus of proximal EoE compared to extended disease (EREFS 1.0 vs. 3.0, p = 0.001; 27.0 eos/hpf vs. 52.5 eos/hpf, p = 0.008). Patients with proximal disease were less likely to undergo dilation compared to patients with distal disease in the follow-up (3.3% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.010). In a multivariate Cox regression model, proximal eosinophilia was less likely to be associated with treatment failure compared to distal eosinophilia. Conclusion: Although isolated proximal EoE is infrequent, it is associated with less severe disease and better disease outcome. Proximal disease appears to present a unique EoE phenotype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although mostly accentuated in the distal esophagus, distribution of esophageal eosinophilia in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) seems to be nonuniform.1 Disease extent has been associated with disease severity and disease progression in inflammatory bowel disease.2,3 Whether the same holds true for EoE remains largely unknown. One recent EoE study looked at the distribution of eosinophilia, but without analyzing its potential association with treatment outcomes.4 Here, we characterize the different inflammatory patterns of EoE and investigate their impact on disease presentation and disease outcome, with a particular focus on therapeutic response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Swiss Eosinophilic Esophagitis Cohort Study (SEECS) is a national cohort that was established in 2015 with the aim of improving quality of care of affected adults with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Between 2020 and 2022, paper questionnaires were gradually replaced by fully electronic data capture using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap ® ) software. We aim to provide an update of the SEECS 8 years after its launch., Methods: The SEECS prospectively includes adults (≥18 years of age) with EoE as well as patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy control subjects (HC). Upon inclusion and follow-up (typically once every 12-18 months), patients and physicians complete REDCap ® questionnaires, which are available in German, French, and English. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and biologic findings are assessed on the same day using validated instruments (EEsAI PRO for symptoms; EoE-QoL-A for QoL; EREFS for endoscopic activity; modified EoE-HSS for histologic activity). The SEECS biobank includes biosamples from patients with EoE, GERD, and HC., Results: As of July 2023, the SEECS included 778 patients (716 [92%] with EoE, 29 [3.8%] with GERD, and 33 [4.2%] HC; 559/778 [71.9%] were male). Mean age ± SD (years) at enrollment according to diagnosis was as follows: EoE 41.9 ± 12.9, GERD 53.6 ± 16.4, HC 51.7 ± 17.2. Concomitant GERD was found in 200 patients (27.9%) of the EoE cohort. Concomitant allergic disorders (asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, eczema) were present in 500 EoE patients (74.4%). At inclusion, 686 (95.8%) of EoE patients were on ongoing treatment (orodispersible budesonide tablet [Jorveza ® ] in 281 patients [41%]; budesonide or fluticasone syrup or swallowed powder in 290 patients [42.3%]; proton-pump inhibitors in 162 patients [23.6%]; elimination diets in 103 patients [15%]; and esophageal dilation at last visit in 166 patients [24.2%]). A total of 8,698 biosamples were collected, of which 1,395 (16%) were used in the framework of translational research projects., Conclusion: SEECS continuously grows and is operational using fully electronic data capture. SEECS offers up-to-date epidemiologic and real-world clinical efficacy data on EoE and promotes clinical and translational research., Competing Interests: Jeanine Wakim has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Ekaterina Safroneeva reports (i) consulting fees from Avir Pharma, Inc., Aptalis Pharma, Inc., Celgene Corp., Novartis, AG, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; (ii) being an employee of Tillotts Pharma AG. Catherine Saner has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Jean-Benoit Rossel has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Sven Trelle has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Marcel Zwahlen has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Luc Biedermann received consulting fees and/or speaker fees and/or research grants from Adare/Ellodi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AstraZeneca, AG, Switzerland, Receptos-Celgene-BMS, Dr. Falk Pharma, GmbH, Germany, Glaxo Smith Kline, AG, Nestlé S. A., Switzerland, Novartis, AG, Switzerland, and Regeneron-Sanofi Pharmaceuticals. Andrea Kreienbuehl has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Thomas Greuter received consulting fees and/or speaker fees and/or research grants from Adare/Ellodi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AstraZeneca, AG, Switzerland, Receptos-Celgene-BMS, Dr. Falk Pharma, GmbH, Germany, Glaxo Smith Kline, AG, Nestlé S. A., Switzerland, Novartis, AG, Switzerland, and Regeneron-Sanofi Pharmaceuticals. Philipp Schreiner received consulting fees and/or speaker fees from Dr. Falk Pharma, GmbH, Takeda, Regerenon-Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, Janssen-Cilag, Receptos-Celgene-BMS. Peter Netzer has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Annett Franke has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Stephan Brand has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Chantal Hasler has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Patrick Aepli has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Emanuel Burri has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Achim Weber has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Christine Sempoux has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Ruggero Biral has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Wolfram Jochum has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Joachim Diebold has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Niels Willi has no relevant financial, professional, or personal relationships to disclose. Alex Straumann received consulting fees and/or speaker fees and/or research grants from Adare/Ellodi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AstraZeneca, AG, Switzerland, Receptos-Celgene-BMS, Dr. Falk Pharma, GmbH, Germany, Glaxo Smith Kline, AG, Nestlé S. A., Switzerland, Novartis, AG, Switzerland, and Regeneron-Sanofi Pharmaceuticals. Alain Schoepfer received consulting fees and/or speaker fees and/or research grants from Adare/Ellodi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AstraZeneca, AG, Switzerland, Receptos-Celgene-BMS, Dr. Falk Pharma, GmbH, Germany, Glaxo Smith Kline, AG, Nestlé S. A., Switzerland, Novartis, AG, Switzerland, and Regeneron-Sanofi Pharmaceuticals., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)