Search

Background: The increasing prevalence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) language models, exemplified by ChatGPT, has sparked inquiries into their influence on creative writing skills in educational contexts. This study aims to quantitatively investigate whether ChatGPT's use negatively affects university students' creative writing abilities, focusing on originality, content presentation, accuracy, and elaboration in essays. The research adopts an experimental approach to shed light on this concern. Objective: This study aims to quantitatively investigate whether the utilization of ChatGPT, an AI chatbot, adversely affects specific dimensions of creative writing skills among university students, with an emphasis on originality, content presentation, accuracy, and elaboration. Method: The experimental study involves 600 students from 10 universities, divided into a control and an experimental group (EGp). The EGp incorporates ChatGPT in their creative writing process as an intervention. The study evaluates originality, content presentation, accuracy, and elaboration, utilizing the Wilcoxon Signed‐Rank Test for analysis. Results and Conclusion: The findings reveal a detrimental association between ChatGPT use and university students' creative writing abilities. Analysing both machine‐based and human‐based assessments substantiates earlier qualitative observations regarding ChatGPT's adverse impact on creative writing. This study highlights the necessity of approaching AI integration, particularly in creative writing disciplines, with caution. While AI tools have merits, their integration should be thoughtful, considering the potential drawbacks. These insights inform future research and educational practices, guiding the effective incorporation of AI while nurturing students' writing skills. Lay Description: What is already known about this topic: ChatGPT poses an ethical dilemma regarding its use in the field of academiaQualitative claims and opinions have been raised in prior studies regarding its use in the creative writing processPrior studies have both supported and opposed its use but with very limited quantitative approaches while most of the opinions remain qualitativeSome prior studies opine in support of ChatGPT's ability as an authorSeveral factors measuring creativity has been identified by previous studies but a constructive approach in the light of advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbots like ChatGPT is missing in such literature What this paper adds: An experimental approach to provide a valid quantitative proof of the qualitative claims over ChatGPT's detrimental effect towards creativity in writing, which was absent in prior studiesA multifactor‐based formula to measure creativity in a quantitative formA quantitative view of the factors that are affected in either a positive way or a negative way in a user by ChatGPT, providing a holistic picture to determine its extent of useA statistical and theoretical understanding over an unexplored topic like creative writing in the light of ChatGPTA quantitative proof why ChatGPT should not be considered as an author Implications for practice and/or policy: Educators may implement changes in assigning tasks to students compared to their earlier practices, based on the identified factors that are being affected negatively, to ensure ChatGPT does not hinder a student's creativity at a greater extentThe extent of using ChatGPT should be limited to self‐learning as positive effect was experienced through the experimentPolicymakers may use the findings of the study to impose strict policies in academia for ensuring academic integrity (Example: must use of plagiarism detecting software for checking scripts, assigning tasks to students which require more analytical abilities, providing tasks which are not properly readable by LLM's like ChatGPT such as image‐based questions, case studies etc.) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The role of libraries in preparing students to thrive during their studies and innovate after university is growing in importance. Information is more easily accessible through digital channels and is increasingly abundant. Generative Artificial intelligence (AI) adds to this reality and increases the need for digitally driven information literacy skills. This paper aims to guide librarians by discussing the digitalization of information creation, retrieval, and use. It recommends the training of both digital and information literacy for students. Librarians are called upon to provide clear guidelines to their universities to steer the use of generative AI. The implications of digital information sources and generative AI are discussed with the role of librarians in context. Information literacy and digital literacy are related. Academic libraries should include digital topics in information literacy training. Information literacy should be trained at the start of university education and before students begin dissertation writing. University libraries should propose guidelines for the use of generative artificial intelligence tools by students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]