Search

Introduction Incontinence is a common, distressing condition, most prevalent in older people. There is an unmet need for effective interventions to support continence. This review focuses on non-pharmacological interventions to reduce incontinence among homebound older people. Aim: to identify interventions with potential to be delivered by care workers, nurses or family members in a person's home. Methods Multiple databases were searched until 15 September 2023 for randomised controlled trials reporting home-based interventions for incontinence for older people (≥65 years) living at home. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and papers against inclusion criteria, then assessed for the Risk of Bias (RoB2). A third reviewer resolved the discrepancies. Primary data were extracted and synthesised. Results A full-text review of 81 papers identified seven eligible papers (1996–2022, all USA), including n  = 636 participants (561 women and 75 men). Two studies focusing on multicomponent behavioural interventions showed benefit, as did one study of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation self-administered through electrode-embedded socks. Three, which included cognitively impaired people, reported improvement with toileting assistance programmes, but the effects were not all significant. Results were inconclusive from a study examining the effects of fluid intake adjustments. Interventions were delivered by nurses, three in collaboration with family caregivers. No faecal incontinence interventions met the criteria. Conclusion There is scant evidence for continence supporting interventions delivered in older people's own homes. With an ageing population often reliant on family or social care workers well-placed to support continence promotion and policy drives for services to support older people remaining at home, this evidence gap needs addressing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Dual sensory impairment (DSI), the combination of visual and hearing impairments, is associated with increased risk for age-related cognitive decline and dementia. Administering cognitive tests to individuals with sensory impairment is challenging because most cognitive measures require sufficient hearing and vision. Considering sensory limitations during cognitive test administration is necessary so that the effects of sensory and cognitive abilities on test performance can be differentiated and the validity of test results optimized. Objective To review empirical strategies that researchers have employed to accommodate DSI during cognitive testing of older adults. Methods Seven databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Global Health and the Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews databases) were searched for relevant articles integrating the three concepts of cognitive evaluation, aging, and DSI. Given the inclusion criteria, this scoping review included a total of 67 papers. Results Twenty-eight studies reported five categories of strategies for cognitive testing of older adult participants with DSI: the assistance of experts, the modification of standardized test scoring procedures, the use of communication strategies, environmental modifications, and the use of cognitive tests without visual and/or auditory items. Conclusions The most used strategy reported in the included studies was drawing on the assistance of team members from related fields during the administration and interpretation of cognitive screening measures. Alternative strategies were rarely employed. Future research is needed to explore the knowledge-to-practice gap between research and current clinical practice, and to develop standardized testing strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: This paper aims to assess kinematic parameters related to functional capacity, fatigue, and breathlessness during the 6-min walk test (6MWT) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods and results: A cross-sectional study was conducted in which adults 70 years or older with HFpEF were voluntarily recruited between April 2019 and March 2020. An inertial sensor was placed at the L3–L4 level and another on the sternum to assess kinematic parameters. The 6MWT was divided into two 3-min phases. Leg fatigue and breathlessness, assessed by the Borg scale, the heart rate (HR), and the oxygen saturation (SpO2), were measured at the beginning and the end of the 6MWT. The difference in kinematic parameters between the 6MWT two 3-min phases was also calculated. Bivariate Pearson correlations and subsequent multivariate linear regression analysis were performed. Seventy older adults with HFpEF (mean = 80.74 years old) were included. Kinematic parameters explained 81.00% of the functional capacity, 45.50% of the leg fatigue and 66.10% of the breathlessness variance. Moreover, kinematic parameters could explain 30.90% of the SpO2 variance at the end of the 6MWT. Kinematic parameters also explained 33.10% of the SpO2 difference between the beginning and end of 6MWT. Kinematic parameters explained neither the HR variance at the end of 6MWT nor the HR difference between the beginning and end. Conclusion: Gait kinematics from L3-L4 and sternum explain a part of the variance in subjective outcomes, assessed by the Borg scale, and objective outcomes such as functional capacity and SpO2. The kinematic assessment allows clinicians to quantify fatigue and breathlessness through objective parameters related to the patient's functional capacity. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03909919. Graphical Abstract [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]