Search

The article presents information on rulings made by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2024. Topics discussed include the cases against former U.S. President Donald J. Trump and the Court's rulings, a comparison between the Supreme Court and the federal appeals court Fifth Circuit in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the conservative and liberal justices in the Supreme Court.

The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court over the ruling made by federal prosecutors on the prosecution of some proponents of U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump who rallied in Washington, D. C. on January 6, 2021. Topics mentioned include the participation of proponents to block certification of the 2020 election results, the effect of riot on Trump's federal case, and the proper application of the obstruction law.

The article reports on the ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court favoring Starbucks in the case accusing the company of illegally suppressing labor organizing when it terminated seven workers at its Memphis store in Tennessee in 2022. According to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Starbucks fired the workers due to their unionization efforts. Also cited are the standards to determine reasonable cause on possible labor law violations.

The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court to allow the Republican-led state of South Carolina to keep using the First Congressional District's voting map that a lower court had deemed an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. It shows the opinion of the court's majority on partisan redistricting, political apartheid and race-based redistricting accusations. It raises arguments of civil rights groups over the racial effect of the map and dilution of African American voting power.

The article reports on the decision issued by the Florida Supreme Court to allow a ban on abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, overturning a court precedent on privacy protections in the state's Constitution. The ruling will ensure that the proposed constitutional amendment on abortion will go on the November 2024 ballot. Also cited is the majority opinion authored by Justice Jamie R. Grosshans.

The article focuses on the Supreme Court's decision to dismiss the case concerning Idaho's abortion restrictions, originally accepted for review but later deemed "improvidently granted," revealing internal tensions and irregularities within the Court's handling of urgent cases.

The article focuses on Brazil's Supreme Court decision to decriminalize marijuana for personal use, allowing citizens to possess up to 40 grams without penalties, marking a significant shift in national drug policy amid a global trend towards greater acceptance of cannabis.

The article focuses on the Georgia Court of Appeals staying the criminal election interference case against former President Donald J. Trump while considering whether the district attorney in Fulton County should be disqualified from prosecuting the case due to a conflict of interest.

The article focuses on the Supreme Court's decision, making it more challenging for individuals to swiftly recover property seized by the police. Topics include the court ruling against two Alabama women seeking prompt hearings for the return of their cars seized in connection with crimes, and dissenting opinions expressing concerns about due process and civil asset forfeiture practices.

The article focuses on Donald J. Trump's looming legal challenges, including a criminal trial and a S454 million judgment in a civil fraud suit, which threaten his financial stability and raise the specter of potential imprisonment.

The article focuses on a legal battle over ownership of a recently fallen meteorite in Sweden, highlighting the rarity of such events and the questions they raise about property rights and scientific value.

The article focuses on a New York judge ruling that prosecutors can introduce damaging evidence, including the "Access Hollywood" recording, in Donald J. Trump's upcoming criminal trial, despite his lawyers' attempts to keep it out.

The article focuses on Donald J. Trump's initial bid to pause the 450 million U.S. dollar judgment he faces in a civil fraud case being rejected by a New York appeals court, potentially exposing him to financial jeopardy.

The article reports on the decision of the High Court in London, England on February 1, 2024 to dismiss a lawsuit filed by former U.S. President Donald J. Trump against Christopher Steele, a former British spy who compiled a dossier in 2016 detailing unproven claims of links between Trump and Russia.

The article focuses on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition refraining from an immediate response to a Supreme Court decision striking down a law limiting the judiciary's powers, as both supporters and opponents emphasize the need for national unity during the conflict with Hamas in Gaza.