Search

• Estimates of the time of emergence of climate change (ToE) for Australian rivers. • Stochastic data generation helps to better define baseline variability. • Uncertainty in ToE represented by 37 CMIP6 projections and 3 emissions scenarios. • ToE in river flows can precede ToE in precipitation by up to 50 years. • ToE substantially delayed or avoided in a low emissions pathway (SSP1-2.6). Climate change impacts on river flows are leading to substantial changes in water availability for human and natural systems. The significance of these impacts largely depends on the degree of change relative to natural variability. The 'Time of Emergence' (ToE) is the point in time (past or future) when the signal of climate change emerges from the noise of background variability. The ToE has been assessed for some climate variables but rarely streamflows. Here we investigate ToE of changes in streamflow across Australia for various characteristic periods relevant to different water management objectives. We assess the uncertainty in ToE estimates from different emissions pathways and a large ensemble of CMIP6 climate model projections. ToE is likely to occur earlier in hydrologic systems subject to low natural variability than those subject to high variability, and to systems that are vulnerable to failure over longer rather than shorter periods. There are clear regional differences in the patterns of ToE, with changes first emerging in south-west regions of Australia, followed by the south-east, then east and north. We estimate that ToE has already occurred in over 10% of sampled rivers for longer characteristic periods, primarily in south-west Australia. Importantly for planning, the results show that ToE in flows precedes ToE in precipitation by up to 50 years due to compounding effects of changes in annual precipitation, precipitation seasonality, and increasing temperatures. The number of catchments projected to have reached ToE by 2080 is heavily influenced by the trajectory of future emissions. A low emissions pathway generally consistent with aspirational goals of the Paris Climate Agreement (SSP1-2.6) substantially delays the emergence of significant hydrological change by up to 50 years, or negates emergence entirely by 2080, depending on location. Our methods can be applied to catchments globally, and our findings have implications for the prioritisation of climate adaptation efforts across different river systems and the urgency of continued action on climate change mitigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rivers of the south-eastern Murray-Darling Basin (MDB) and the associated irrigation areas of the southern riverine plain (SRP) in south-eastern Australia have undergone major hydrological changes over the last 30 years. These include a period of lower rainfall; a rebalance of surface water diversions between consumptive and environmental water uses under the MDB Basin Plan, improvements in water infrastructure; water trade out of the region; and falling groundwater levels. All these changes increase losses from streams to groundwater systems; potentially leading to the need for greater releases from dams to maintain baseflow in the major rivers. Baseflow is important for conveyance of water, water quality and baseflow-dependent ecosystems during dry periods. Hydrological changes in the SRP will reduce the streamflow by 2029–30 by an estimated 80 to 320 GL/yr. Further hydrological changes by 2029–30 will reduce the streamflow by another 50 GL/yr in the following decade. This is the first assessment of the cumulative stream impacts of the SRP and is relatively lower than previous assessments for single drivers. The current approach of mitigating unexpected losses is to increase conveyance loss budgets as required. This could be extended to mitigate the lower end of potential impacts; but further steps to reduce losses may be required towards the upper end. Further actions include a review of extraction limits for surface water and groundwater, trigger levels, and a greater shift towards conjunctive water management. Groundwater extraction, which has dominated impacts, is increasing from a relatively low proportion of the extraction limit in Goulburn-Murray Sedimentary Plain and shallow aquifers of the SRP. Over time, climate change will become more dominant as a driver. Most monitoring required to support mitigation already exists, but data is not collated or reported in a form relevant for stream impacts. Modelling also needs to be updated with reporting of more relevant outputs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For over two decades, Australia has sought to address the effects of the over allocation of water resources in the Murray-Darling Basin through implementation of the Murray Darling Basin Plan (2012). It is increasingly apparent that the impacts of climate change on surface runoff and water demand will profoundly impact rivers, potentially negating the Basin Plan's achievements. It will be critical that we use the lessons from the last two decades to inform adaptation to climate change. Environmental water allocations over the last decade have focussed on providing base flows, freshes, and overbank flows, within a Natural Flow Regime paradigm. In a climate-changed world managers have three broad options. The first would be to continue to pursue single loop adaptive management making improvements within the existing framework. The second option would be to adapt the system approach to focus on a subset of sites, akin to maintaining aquatic reserves. The third option would be to move flow management away from the natural flow paradigm to a more functional regime. This approach would invoke the second adaptive management loop by evaluating options for adaptation and developing processes for navigating trade-offs among social, economic, cultural, and environmental values and between protection, restoration, and adaptation. Changes in water availability because of climate change will require more than incremental adaptation (first loop adaptive management) and will necessitate consideration of either protecting a smaller suite of spatial areas or a smaller set of functional outcomes. This requires profound change to some of the Basin Plan's approaches to environmental flow management. The review of the Basin Plan in 2026 provides a rare opportunity to adapt the Basin Plan from a foundation of protect and restore to one that includes adaptation, and this will require substantive changes to the Basin Plan (second loop adaptive management). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The influence of management decisions on water allocations are often overlooked. • Effects of different water management rules were simulated in two Australian rivers. • Changing management rules alone varied long-term water allocations by −6 to +22%. • Influence of drivers varied with river system and reliability of water license. • More systematic and transparent water allocation decisions will be beneficial. A global challenge for water resource management in rivers worldwide is ensuring water supply reliability satisfies consumptive and environmental demands. High variability in water supply, water policy and management decisions, and uncertainty about the effects of climate change compound this challenge. Understanding factors driving water allocations and consequences for water users and the environment is essential. Rainfall and streamflow traditionally drive allocations, yet the influence of water management decisions are often overlooked because they are complex, rarely codified and dependent on the regional context. We compared the relative influences of water management, climate and the river system characteristics including demand and water storage infrastructure on regulated and unregulated water allocations in two regulated rivers with large dams for water supply to towns, irrigated agriculture and wetlands of international significance (Gwydir and Macquarie Rivers of the Murray-Darling Basin, southeastern Australia), using hydrological simulation models and regression-based sensitivity analyses under an historical and drier climate. Water management decisions influenced regulated water allocations (explaining 23% to 52% of the variance) considerably more than unregulated water allocations (explaining 2%). For regulated water allocations, water management decisions and the river system were more important than a plausible change in climate, while for unregulated water allocations, the river system and climate change were dominant drivers. Changing management rules alone could vary long term water allocations by between −6% and +0.1% in the Gwydir River and between −4% and +22% in the Macquarie River. Management rules which allocated future inflows (i.e. credit model) were more likely to fail in a drying environment with projected reductions in runoff, compared to rules where only water in storage is allocated (i.e. debit model). Management rules differed despite both river systems being governed by a single management agency under the same legislative and policy framework. More systematic approaches to justify water management rules and greater transparency in their influence on water allocations are critical for maximizing the benefits to water users and river health, and for managing risks to water supply in a variable and changing climate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Climate change affects natural systems, leading to increased acceleration of global water cycle and substantial impacts on the productivity of tropical rivers and the several ecosystem functions they provide. However, the anticipated impacts of climate change in terms of frequency and intensity of extreme events (e.g., droughts and floods) on hydrological systems across regions could be substantially different. This study therefore aims to assess the impacts of climate change on the streamflow of a large river basin located in central Australia (Cooper Creek-Bulloo River Basin). Modified version of the hydrological model Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) was used in this study to generate daily streamflow. This model was first calibrated (2001–2010) and then validated for two independent periods (1993–1997 and 2011–2015). The model depicted a good performance in simulating observed streamflow. Climate projection data from multiple general circulation models (ACCESS1.0, CanESM2, CESM1-CAM5, CNRM-CM5, GFDL-ESM2M, HadGEM2-CC, MIROC5, NorESM1-M, ACCESS1-0, ACCESS1-3, CCSM4, CNRM-CM5, CSIRO-Mk3.6, GFDL-CM3, GFDL-ESM2M, HadGEM2, MIROC5, MPI-ESM-LR, and NorESM1-M) in various forms (raw, statistically downscaled, dynamically downscaled, and bias adjusted) were considered in this study. Results showed that three high resolution dynamically downscaled and bias adjusted models (ACCESS1-3, CNRM-CM5, and MPI-ESM-LR) from Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN) dataset (v1.0.2) have better performance than other models considered, that is, in terms of capturing observed precipitation over the basin. Future climate projections of ensemble of these three models forced with RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 emission scenarios were then used to generate streamflow for 2050s (2040–2069) and 2080s (2070–2099). Results of the study indicated that mean annual precipitation was projected to decrease by up to −8% in 2050s and temperature was projected to increase by up to 4.66 °C in 2080s under the average and extreme emission scenarios, respectively. Mean annual, mean seasonal (December–February, March–May, June–August, September–November), and mean monthly streamflow were projected to decrease under different emission scenarios in 2050s and 2080s. These results indicate decreased water availability in the future as well as water cycle intensification. These changes in streamflow might have impacts on agriculture, natural ecosystem, and could lead to water restrictions. The outcome of this study can directly feed into frameworks for sustainable management of water resources and support adaptation strategies that rely on science and policy to improve water resources allocation in the region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Practitioners of environmental water management (EWM) operate within complex social-ecological systems. We sought to better understand this complexity by investigating the management of environmental water for vegetation outcomes. We conducted an online survey to determine practitioners' perspectives on EWM for non-woody vegetation (NWV) in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia with regards to: i) desirable outcomes and benefits; ii) influencing factors and risks; iii) challenges of monitoring and evaluation, and iv) improving outcomes. Survey participants indicated that EWM aims to achieve outcomes by improving or maintaining vegetation attributes and the functions and values these provide. Our study reveals that EWM practitioners perceive NWV management in a holistic and highly interconnected way. Numerous influencing factors as well as risks and challenges to achieving outcomes were identified by participants, including many unrelated to water. Survey responses highlighted six areas to improve EWM for NWV outcomes: (1) flow regimes, (2) vegetation attributes, (3) non-flow drivers, (4) management-governance considerations, (5) functions and values, and (6) monitoring, evaluation and research. These suggest a need for more than 'just water' when it comes to the restoration and management of NWV. Our findings indicate more integrated land-water governance and management is urgently required to address the impacts of non-flow drivers such as pest species, land-use change and climate change. The results also indicate that inherent complexity in EWM for ecological outcomes has been poorly addressed, with a need to tackle social-ecological constraints to improve EWM outcomes. [Display omitted] • Flow is important for vegetation, but management requires more than just water. • Integrated land-water management is needed to limit impacts of non-flow drivers. • Constraints need to be addressed to improve vegetation outcomes to flow regimes. • Practitioners perceive vegetation management in holistic and interconnected ways. • Building societal understanding of environmental water management is important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]