Search

It is introduced an immune dynamic n-valued Łukasiewicz logic I D Ł n on the base of n-valued Łukasiewicz logic Ł n and corresponding to it immune dynamic M V n -algebra ( I D L n -algebra), 1 < n < ω , which are algebraic counterparts of the logic, that in turn represent two-sorted algebras (M , R , ◊) that combine the varieties of M V n -algebras M = (M , ⊕ , ⊙ , ∼ , 0 , 1) and regular algebras R = (R , ∪ , ; , ∗) into a single finitely axiomatized variety resembling R-module with "scalar" multiplication ◊ . Kripke semantics is developed for immune dynamic Łukasiewicz logic I D Ł n with application in immune system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recently, algebraic Routley–Meyer-style semantics was introduced for basic substructural logics. This paper extends it to fuzzy logics. First, we recall the basic substructural core fuzzy logic MIAL (Mianorm logic) and its axiomatic extensions, together with their algebraic semantics. Next, we introduce two kinds of ternary relational semantics, called here linear Urquhart-style and Fine-style Routley–Meyer semantics, for them as algebraic Routley–Meyer-style semantics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 'Kripke-style' semantics is given for combinatory logic using frames with a ternary accessibility relation, much as in the Tourley-Meyer semantics for relevance logic. We prove by algebraic means a completeness theorem for combinatory logic, by proving a representation theorem for 'combinatory posets.' A philosophical interpretation is given of the models, showing that an element of a combinatory poset can be understood simultaneously as a set of states and as a set of (untyped) actions on states. This double interpretation allows for one such element to be applied to another (including itself). Application turns out to be modeled the same way as 'fusion' in relevance logic.We also introduce 'dual combinators' that apply from the right. We then explore relationships to some well-known substructural logics, showing that each can be embedded into the structurally free. non-associative Lambek calculus, with the embedding taking a theorem ω to a statement of the form Γ ⊨ ω, where Γ is some fusion of the combinators (sometimes dual combinators as well) needed to justify the structural assumptions of the given substructural logic. This builds on earlier ideas from Belnap and Meyer about a Gentzen system wherein structural rules are replaced with rules for introducing combinators. We develop such a system and prove a cut theorem.Keywords: combinatory logic, substructural logic, Gentzen, gaggle, relevance logic, semantics, algebraic logic [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]