Search

There is ample evidence that Black Carbon (BC) is harmful to the Arctic. BC can darken the otherwise highly reflective surfaces of snow and ice and increase atmospheric and ice surface temperatures. Because of the importance of BC to the Arctic, this work was designed to resolve the most significant source regions of Arctic BC as measured by monitoring stations in the Arctic. Using a bottom‐up approach, it is shown for the first time that there is one particular BC transport pathway from lower latitudes into the Arctic that registers at all but one of the Arctic surface monitoring stations included in this study. Through this pathway, pollutants are transported from the Indo‐Gangetic plane over Central Asia into the high Arctic in as little as 7 days. The measurement sites and BC pathways in this study are shown to be well representative of the Arctic as a whole. Plain Language Summary: Snow and sea ice are two of the most reflective surfaces occurring naturally on planet Earth. Light absorbing aerosols, such as wind blown black carbon, that stick to these pristine surfaces can make them less reflective, thus converting more sunlight into heat. The added heat leads to increased surface temperatures and is detrimental to the Arctic climate. There are few sources of light absorbing aerosols in the Arctic compared to the vast amounts of black carbon aerosols that are emitted closer to the equator. This research highlights an important pathway for light absorbing aerosols to enter the Arctic. Light absorbing aerosols that enter the Arctic through this pathway can then subsequently spread out throughout the Arctic. This pathway is shown to transport light absorbing airborne pollutants from South Asia, over Central Asia, and into the high Arctic in quantities that well exceed the background levels, thus highlighting the importance of this newly found pathway. Key Points: Black Carbon aerosols can travel from South Asia over Central Asia and to the Arctic in 7 daysBlack Carbon transported via this pathway measures well above the station average at almost all Arctic stationsThe identified pathway is significant for Black Carbon concentrations throughout the Arctic [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The circum-Arctic region experienced serious fires in 2019 and 2020. Biomass burning is considered a primary source of black carbon (BC) aerosols. BC contributes to Arctic warming and impacts snow/ice melting. However, the impacts of biomass burning on BC in the Arctic during these recent serious fires have not been quantified in detail. In this study, based on numerical simulations using the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Chemistry (WRF-Chem), we calculated the contribution ratios of biomass burning to Arctic BC and revealed its transport pathways. Affected by biomass burning emissions, the near-surface BC concentrations over the terrestrial areas within the Arctic Circle were highest in summer, and declined in spring and autumn. Spatially, high-concentration levels of BC were distributed in the Russian central and eastern areas. Biomass burning accounted for 63.72% and 45.18% of the summer BC in the Arctic near-surface and middle troposphere, respectively. In the near-surface, the contributions from local Arctic sources were comparable to those from sources outside the Arctic Circle in summer. In the middle troposphere, contributions from sources outside the Arctic Circle were dominant. In summer, BC originating from biomass burning in Siberia was transported a short distance by southwesterly winds to the central Arctic near-surface, while the enhanced southwesterly winds in the middle troposphere transported BC from Siberia, Alaska and northern Canada to the central Arctic and Greenland. In spring and autumn, most BC originating from biomass burning in the near-surface of Eurasia was transported eastward by westerly winds and then transported northward over the North Pacific Ocean, and the long distance may have resulted in fewer effects on the Arctic. These results highlight the important role of biomass burning in the Arctic environment under a warming climate. [Display omitted] • Affected by biomass burning, the near-surface BC concentrations over the terrestrial areas within the Arctic Circle were highest in summer. • The biomass burning contributions from local sources to Arctic BC in the near-surface in summer were obvious. • BC from biomass burning in the near-surface of Siberia were transported by southwesterly winds to the central Arctic. • The enhanced southwesterly winds in the middle troposphere transported BC from Siberia, Alaska, and northern Canada to the central Arctic and Greenland. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 and subsequent spread of the disease COVID-19 became classified as a pandemic in March of 2020, leading to global safety measures introduced to limit the impact of the virus. This combination of safety measures has become commonly referred to as "lockdown". The associated industry and lifestyle changes led to reductions in the anthropogenic emission of atmospheric pollutants such as black carbon (BC), which is transported from the mid-latitudes into the Arctic during the winter and spring. Measurements of BC and other anthropogenic pollutants are of increasing importance in the Arctic due to the rapid warming observed there in the past few decades. It is believed that BC has a significant role in this warming, and so understanding the Arctic's response to reduced BC emissions at lower latitudes will provide insight into how future changes might mitigate further warming. Reductions in BC have been reported worldwide, and so in this study, the impact of these reductions on BC concentrations at the High Arctic site Villum Research Station was investigated. The effect was examined from March 2020, around when global lockdowns began, to June 2020, when the Arctic haze period ended and BC levels were once again low. Firstly, the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model (DEHM) was used to assess this impact on BC concentrations by adjusting global anthropogenic pollution emission inventories to simulate those observed during the lockdown period and comparing the results to a similar model run with standard emission inventories. Secondly, equivalent BC data from an aethalometer at Villum Research Station were analysed, comparing the concentrations during the lockdown period to both aethalometer data from previous years and DEHM results from the lockdown period. It was found that when adjusted DEHM emission inventories were introduced from the 1st of March, the model predicted a reduction in BC concentrations beginning on the 10th of March and reached a 10% reduction by the 1st of April. This reduction fluctuated around 10% until the end of the Arctic haze period. Aethalometer data did not show any significant change from previous years, and no concentration reduction could be concluded from its comparison with DEHM results. This is likely because the predicted reduction of 10% is smaller than both the inter-annual and intra-annual variability of measured BC concentrations at Villum. • DEHM model and aethalometer used to assess effect of lockdown on Villum BC levels. • DEHM model simulated a 10% reduction in BC at Villum during April–May 2020. • Similar reductions are expected throughout the Arctic region (between 7% and 11%). • The aethalometer showed no response to the lockdown due to inherent BC variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Black carbon (BC), organic carbon (OC), and total carbon (TC) in snow are important for their climatic and cryospheric effects. They are also part of the global carbon cycle. Atmospheric black and organic carbon (including brown carbon) may deposit and darken snow surfaces. Currently, there are no standardized methods for sampling, filtering, and analysis protocols to detect carbon in snow. Here, we describe our current methods and protocols to detect carbon in seasonal snow using the OCEC thermal optical method, a European standard for atmospheric elemental carbon (EC). We analyzed snow collected within and around the urban background SMEARIII (Station for Measuring Ecosystem-Atmosphere Relations) at Kumpula (60° N) and the Arctic GAW (Global Atmospheric Watch) station at Sodankylä (67° N). The median BC, OC, and TC in snow samples (ntot = 30) in Kumpula were 1118, 5279, and 6396 ppb, and in Sodankylä, they were 19, 1751, and 629 ppb. Laboratory experiments showed that error due to carbon attached to a sampling bag (n = 11) was <0.01%. Sonication slightly increased the measured EC, while wetting the filter or filtering the wrong side up indicated a possible sample loss. Finally, we discuss the benefits and drawbacks of OCEC to detect carbon in snow. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]