Search

Lithium‐ion cell chemistries are favored in the automotive sector, as they enable electric vehicles (EVs) to compete with traditional gasoline‐powered vehicles in terms of performance, range, and cost. The life and performance of these packs depend upon the Battery management system which monitors and controls the pack. The modeling, simulation, and analysis of a lithium‐ion battery pack that closely resembles an actual automobile battery are the focus of this paper. Real cells that are commercially available and specifically developed for automotive applications are modeled in the simulation environment. The cell characterization and formation of pack topology with heat exchange are addressed. A commercial electric car's power train model and EV dynamics are used in the simulation environment to test the modeled battery pack over various drive cycles. The performance analysis is upscaled by considering different aspects like resistive forces while driving, ambient temperature, initial conditions while the vehicle starts, etc. The battery manufacturer can verify the battery's performance under different load conditions, with a high degree of similarity to real‐world scenarios. The simulations are conducted on MATLAB/Simulink 2021b software. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Batteries are essential to mobilization and electrification as they are used in a wide range of applications, from electric vehicles to small mobile devices. All these devices are powered with AC or DC inside their systems, so they require different battery systems depending on their technical requirements. Batteries show unique characteristics depending on their types, and their needs vary based on their performance, ambient conditions, and so forth. One of the main demands for them is thermal stability. For batteries, thermal stability is not just about safety; it's also about economics, the environment, performance, and system stability. This paper has evaluated over 200 papers and harvested their data to build a collective understanding of battery thermal management systems (BTMSs). These studies are specifically designed to solve different problems. This paper has been prepared to show what these systems are, how they work, what they have been designed for, and under what conditions they should be applied. The BTMSs have been evaluated based on their method, method tools, discharge rate, maximum temperature, temperature difference values, and ambient and inlet temperatures. After evaluating over 200 studies, the results indicate that the passive BTMSs are not useful the cases where the temperature reaches higher values suddenly, especially for system systems that require higher discharge rates. On the other hand, active cooling methods do not manage the temperature difference in the battery cells. However, hybrid cooling methods address both cases admirably by compensating for both of their weaknesses and bringing out their advantages. The general optimum temperature for lithium battery batteries is 55°C. Even though there are many other parameters that need to be considered before making a decision for a BTMS design, the best performance for an optimum system seems to be methods 34, 38, and 22 as they are able to provide lower maximum temperature and temperature difference in the cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, the temperature response of a lithium‐ion type 18650 battery pack cooled by a thermoelectric air‐cooling module is presented. The effects of the airflow rate, on‐off cooling fan position, charging and discharging rate and cooling by the thermoelectric air‐cooling module are investigated. The charging and discharging procedures with different current rates of 2 A (0.06 C), 3 A (0.09 C), and 4 A (0.12 C) are investigated. The results showed that different test conditions of the thermoelectric air‐cooling module have a substantial effect on the temperature of the battery pack. It was demonstrated that a thermoelectric air‐cooling module has a decreased battery temperature of lower than 40°C. The operating conditions of the cooling fans have a substantial effect on battery temperature. The experiment in which all the cooling fans are turned on shows a higher cooling capacity than natural air cooling by approximately 16%–57%. However, when setting the on‐off position of the fans that are installed in different positions, the cooling capacity when the fans at the inlet and thermoelectric cooling heat sink are turned on and the fan at the outlet battery pack is turned off is slightly less than that when all the cooling fans are turned on by approximately 25%–57%. Therefore, it can be selected as an optimum for cooling the battery pack due to less power consumption and noise issues. The proposed research can be implemented as a guideline for the cooling system of energy storage, such as small electric vehicle platforms, ground batteries, and solar energy storage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is more convenient and safer to employ wireless power transfer (WPT) systems to charge the battery pack of electric scooters (ESs) than conventional plug-in systems. A charging equaliser suitable for ESs is proposed to achieve constant current (CC) output without communication link between the transmitter side and the receiver side. The full-bridge rectifier and select switches utilised at the receiver side are employed to be operated once to change from the balancing mode to charging modes. The characteristics of the load-independent current output in the CC mode are achieved by properly selecting the parameters of the circuit so that no sophisticated control strategies are required to regulate the output as per the charging profile. The experimental results show that when the voltage of battery pack is charged at 32 or 4.2 V, the current is 1.02 or 1.12 A, respectively. Therefore, the proposed system can be considered as a CC system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study presents a multidisciplinary end-to-end design, build, and test drive experience of a Formula Society of Automatic Engineers (FSAE) electric vehicle. The design team members' background include computer engineering, electrical engineering, and mechanical engineering expertise. Each team member worked on a sub-team namely mechanical, drivetrain, supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA), and battery management system (BMS). The mechanical team modified/redesigned a gasoline FSAE car frame to accommodate the battery pack, cooling systems, electric drive train, and SCADA hardware. The drivetrain team designed a combinational logic-based tractive system control board to enhance the safety and reliability of the drivetrain. The SCADA team used a model-view-controller software architecture and agile development practices to design and implement a custom electric vehicle operating system and the main brain hardware. The BMS team designed the sensing network and communication protocol to provide an update on the state of the health of the energy source. A thorough description of each sub-system is provided herein. System integration and field test results are also included. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]