Search

Background: The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy, safety, and pain level of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration via a subcutaneous catheter compared with direct injection in children with cancer. Method: This was a pilot randomized controlled trial of standard G-CSF administration versus subcutaneous catheter administration. Children 2–15 years of age who were beginning G-CSF after their first chemotherapy cycle and anticipated to receive G-CSF following the next three cycles of chemotherapy were eligible. Efficacy, safety, and pain were as outcomes of the study. Results: Twenty-nine children with cancer (median age 12 years) were enrolled in the study (16 children in the subcutaneous catheter group and 13 children in the direct injection group). During Cycle 2, the median number of days to reach absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 500/mm3 was greater among those in the subcutaneous catheter group (12 vs. 10; p =.02). In Cycle 3, however, the subcutaneous catheter group received fewer doses of G-CSF (8 vs. 12; p =.004). No complications related to subcutaneous catheter use were observed. No differences in the visual analog scale pain score were observed between groups in Cycles 1 to 3; however, in Cycle 4, children in the subcutaneous catheter group had lower median pain scores than those in the direct subcutaneous injection group (Mdn = 0, [IQR] = 0–2 vs. Mdn = 1, IQR = 0–6; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Results demonstrated administering G-CSF via a subcutaneous catheter enables ANC to recover with no pain or complications associated with its use. Thus, oncology teams may consider this administration method to be used in children with cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]