Search

Gestational surrogacy is a reproductive arrangement where a woman gestates a child for others—the "intended parents"—in order to be handed over to them after birth. Since the turn of the millennium, demands for surrogacy have continuously increased due to social and demographic changes, rising rates of infertility, and the normalization of new, non-heteronormative, family forms. Many countries prohibit surrogacy, and others that previously permitted this reproductive arrangement closed down as a result of political decisions or surrogacy scandals. Moreover, surrogacy is offered at greatly varying costs, ranging from approximately US$50,000 in countries like the Republic of Georgia to US$200,000 in fertility clinics in California. Accordingly, many of these arrangements are transnational, with intended parents who cannot access surrogacy or afford surrogacy in their home country commissioning it in countries such as the United States, until recently Ukraine, and today increasingly in the Republic of Georgia. Existing research has focused on surrogacy from different angles, such as practices of kinning and de-kinning, inequality and stratification, the political economy of the fertility industry, and its gender dimensions. We engage in, but further these debates by drawing attention to settings, accounts, experiences, and new theoretical notions that diverge from "mainstream" presentations of surrogacy. Moreover, in this Special Issue, we experimented with writing joint papers with a deliberative aim to provide comparative analyses and emphasize the links between and diversity of different cases of surrogacy. Therefore, all papers have an explicit comparative character and are all based on empirical studies from more than one field site. They provide nuanced understandings of surrogacy arrangements, grounded in empirical data rather than ideological, political, or moral assessments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, we offer an analysis of the development of "repronubs": less-known locations offering small-scale, niche cross-border gestational surrogacy or surrogacy services for a regional market. This analytical category of "repronubs" is useful to describe the formation of the industry from small local sites to those offering cross-border services. Based on our work in these locations, we compare the markets, regulatory contexts, and organization of the industry in Ghana, Kazakhstan, and Laos, focusing on the "repropreneurs" or surrogacy facilitation agents as pivotal in the emergence of these sites. These "repronubs" highlight the surrogacy trade between countries of the Global South and are established next to or instead of the more well-known North–South destinations. We document how surrogacy itself is increasingly stratified between higher cost and better-regulated environments such as in certain states of the United States or Canada and lower cost, less well regulated, and regionally focused environments in the settings we describe. These locations are characterized by poor or liberal regulations, the existence of local in vitro fertilization (IVF) expertise, and the emergence of local repropreneurs driving the trade using their social networks. The growth of demand from China and the growing affluent middle class in Africa is creating further markets for such regional "nubs." Studying surrogacy in such locations is made difficult by the secrecy and confidentiality surrounding it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, I consider how the 'new hysteria' of uterus transplants (UTx) continues traditions of medical experimentation focussed upon the correction of the defective female body. Media accounts of 'first' UTx events in the US are analysed to describe the narrative 'anchors' used in these accounts. In Sweden and Denmark, UTx is presented within the media as a means to avoid surrogacy, while in the US UTx is constructed as an alternate choice to surrogacy in keeping with the US emphasis on neoliberal choices. These differing approaches to surrogacy and UTx reflect the different social contexts. In media accounts, risks are minimised and success is emphasised, and the potentials of UTx for non-heteronormative reproduction are not mentioned. Despite parallels with other forms of transplantation and surrogacy markets, public representations avoid the potential of a future UTx market. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]