12 results on '"Meijer, Jeroen"'
Search Results
2. Identifying and tracking mobile elements in evolving compost communities yields insights into the nanobiome
- Author
-
van Dijk, Bram, Buffard, Pauline, Farr, Andrew D., Giersdorf, Franz, Meijer, Jeroen, Dutilh, Bas E., and Rainey, Paul B.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Innovative analytical methodologies for characterizing chemical exposure with a view to next-generation risk assessment
- Author
-
Tkalec, Žiga, Antignac, Jean-Philippe, Bandow, Nicole, Béen, Frederic M., Belova, Lidia, Bessems, Jos, Le Bizec, Bruno, Brack, Werner, Cano-Sancho, German, Chaker, Jade, Covaci, Adrian, Creusot, Nicolas, David, Arthur, Debrauwer, Laurent, Dervilly, Gaud, Duca, Radu Corneliu, Fessard, Valérie, Grimalt, Joan O., Guerin, Thierry, Habchi, Baninia, Hecht, Helge, Hollender, Juliane, Jamin, Emilien L., Klánová, Jana, Kosjek, Tina, Krauss, Martin, Lamoree, Marja, Lavison-Bompard, Gwenaelle, Meijer, Jeroen, Moeller, Ruth, Mol, Hans, Mompelat, Sophie, Van Nieuwenhuyse, An, Oberacher, Herbert, Parinet, Julien, Van Poucke, Christof, Roškar, Robert, Togola, Anne, Trontelj, Jurij, and Price, Elliott J.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Do cats mirror their owner? Paired exposure assessment using silicone bands to measure residential PAH exposure
- Author
-
Figueiredo, Daniel M., Lô, Serigne, Krop, Esmeralda, Meijer, Jeroen, Beeltje, Henry, Lamoree, Marja H., and Vermeulen, Roel
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The NORMAN Suspect List Exchange (NORMAN-SLE): facilitating European and worldwide collaboration on suspect screening in high resolution mass spectrometry
- Author
-
Mohammed Taha, Hiba, Aalizadeh, Reza, Alygizakis, Nikiforos, Antignac, Jean-Philippe, Arp, Hans Peter H., Bade, Richard, Baker, Nancy, Belova, Lidia, Bijlsma, Lubertus, Bolton, Evan E., Brack, Werner, Celma, Alberto, Chen, Wen-Ling, Cheng, Tiejun, Chirsir, Parviel, Čirka, Ľuboš, D’Agostino, Lisa A., Djoumbou Feunang, Yannick, Dulio, Valeria, Fischer, Stellan, Gago-Ferrero, Pablo, Galani, Aikaterini, Geueke, Birgit, Głowacka, Natalia, Glüge, Juliane, Groh, Ksenia, Grosse, Sylvia, Haglund, Peter, Hakkinen, Pertti J., Hale, Sarah E., Hernandez, Felix, Janssen, Elisabeth M.-L., Jonkers, Tim, Kiefer, Karin, Kirchner, Michal, Koschorreck, Jan, Krauss, Martin, Krier, Jessy, Lamoree, Marja H., Letzel, Marion, Letzel, Thomas, Li, Qingliang, Little, James, Liu, Yanna, Lunderberg, David M., Martin, Jonathan W., McEachran, Andrew D., McLean, John A., Meier, Christiane, Meijer, Jeroen, Menger, Frank, Merino, Carla, Muncke, Jane, Muschket, Matthias, Neumann, Michael, Neveu, Vanessa, Ng, Kelsey, Oberacher, Herbert, O’Brien, Jake, Oswald, Peter, Oswaldova, Martina, Picache, Jaqueline A., Postigo, Cristina, Ramirez, Noelia, Reemtsma, Thorsten, Renaud, Justin, Rostkowski, Pawel, Rüdel, Heinz, Salek, Reza M., Samanipour, Saer, Scheringer, Martin, Schliebner, Ivo, Schulz, Wolfgang, Schulze, Tobias, Sengl, Manfred, Shoemaker, Benjamin A., Sims, Kerry, Singer, Heinz, Singh, Randolph R., Sumarah, Mark, Thiessen, Paul A., Thomas, Kevin V., Torres, Sonia, Trier, Xenia, van Wezel, Annemarie P., Vermeulen, Roel C. H., Vlaanderen, Jelle J., von der Ohe, Peter C., Wang, Zhanyun, Williams, Antony J., Willighagen, Egon L., Wishart, David S., Zhang, Jian, Thomaidis, Nikolaos S., Hollender, Juliane, Slobodnik, Jaroslav, and Schymanski, Emma L.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Inter-laboratory mass spectrometry dataset based on passive sampling of drinking water for non-target analysis
- Author
-
Schulze, Bastian, van Herwerden, Denice, Allan, Ian, Bijlsma, Lubertus, Etxebarria, Nestor, Hansen, Martin, Merel, Sylvain, Vrana, Branislav, Aalizadeh, Reza, Bajema, Bernard, Dubocq, Florian, Coppola, Gianluca, Fildier, Aurélie, Fialová, Pavla, Frøkjær, Emil, Grabic, Roman, Gago-Ferrero, Pablo, Gravert, Thorsten, Hollender, Juliane, Huynh, Nina, Jacobs, Griet, Jonkers, Tim, Kaserzon, Sarit, Lamoree, Marja, Le Roux, Julien, Mairinger, Teresa, Margoum, Christelle, Mascolo, Giuseppe, Mebold, Emmanuelle, Menger, Frank, Miège, Cécile, Meijer, Jeroen, Moilleron, Régis, Murgolo, Sapia, Peruzzo, Massimo, Pijnappels, Martijn, Reid, Malcolm, Roscioli, Claudio, Soulier, Coralie, Valsecchi, Sara, Thomaidis, Nikolaos, Vulliet, Emmanuelle, Young, Robert, and Samanipour, Saer
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. High-Performance Data Processing Workflow Incorporating Effect-Directed Analysis for Feature Prioritization in Suspect and Nontarget Screening
- Author
-
Jonkers, Tim J H, Meijer, Jeroen, Vlaanderen, Jelle J, Vermeulen, Roel C H, Houtman, Corine J, Hamers, Timo, Lamoree, Marja H, IRAS OH Epidemiology Chemical Agents, dIRAS RA-2, E&H: Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, AIMMS, E&H: Environmental Health and Toxicology, IRAS OH Epidemiology Chemical Agents, and dIRAS RA-2
- Subjects
Chemistry(all) ,TTR-binding ,General Chemistry ,effect-directed analysis ,Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry ,Mass Spectrometry ,Article ,Workflow ,bioassay ,antibiotic ,Toxicity Tests ,Humans ,Environmental Chemistry ,Biological Assay ,suspect and nontarget screening ,environment - Abstract
Effect-directed analysis (EDA) aims at the detection of bioactive chemicals of emerging concern (CECs) by combining toxicity testing and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). However, consolidation of toxicological and chemical analysis techniques to identify bioactive CECs remains challenging and laborious. In this study, we incorporate state-of-the-art identification approaches in EDA and propose a robust workflow for the high-throughput screening of CECs in environmental and human samples. Three different sample types were extracted and chemically analyzed using a single high-performance liquid chromatography HRMS method. Chemical features were annotated by suspect screening with several reference databases. Annotation quality was assessed using an automated scoring system. In parallel, the extracts were fractionated into 80 micro-fractions each covering a couple of seconds from the chromatogram run and tested for bioactivity in two bioassays. The EDA workflow prioritized and identified chemical features related to bioactive fractions with varying levels of confidence. Confidence levels were improved with the in silico software tools MetFrag and the retention time indices platform. The toxicological and chemical data quality was comparable between the use of single and multiple technical replicates. The proposed workflow incorporating EDA for feature prioritization in suspect and nontarget screening paves the way for the routine identification of CECs in a high-throughput manner., A comprehensive workflow was developed that incorporates effect-directed analysis in suspect and nontarget screening for feature prioritization, allowing for the high-throughput identification of bioactive chemicals of emerging concern.
- Published
- 2022
8. Towards evolutionary predictions: Current promises and challenges
- Author
-
Wortel, Meike T., Agashe, Deepa, Bailey, Susan F., Bank, Claudia, Bisschop, Karen, Blankers, Thomas, Laan, L., Meijer, Jeroen, and Tans, S.J.
- Subjects
models ,predictability ,evolution ,population genetics ,prediction ,evolutionary control ,disease modelling - Abstract
Evolution has traditionally been a historical and descriptive science, and predicting future evolutionary processes has long been considered impossible. However, evolutionary predictions are increasingly being developed and used in medicine, agriculture, biotechnology and conservation biology. Evolutionary predictions may be used for different purposes, such as to prepare for the future, to try and change the course of evolution or to determine how well we understand evolutionary processes. Similarly, the exact aspect of the evolved population that we want to predict may also differ. For example, we could try to predict which genotype will dominate, the fitness of the population or the extinction probability of a population. In addition, there are many uses of evolutionary predictions that may not always be recognized as such. The main goal of this review is to increase awareness of methods and data in different research fields by showing the breadth of situations in which evolutionary predictions are made. We describe how diverse evolutionary predictions share a common structure described by the predictive scope, time scale and precision. Then, by using examples ranging from SARS-CoV2 and influenza to CRISPR-based gene drives and sustainable product formation in biotechnology, we discuss the methods for predicting evolution, the factors that affect predictability and how predictions can be used to prevent evolution in undesirable directions or to promote beneficial evolution (i.e. evolutionary control). We hope that this review will stimulate collaboration between fields by establishing a common language for evolutionary predictions.
- Published
- 2022
9. The NORMAN Suspect List Exchange (NORMAN-SLE): facilitating European and worldwide collaboration on suspect screening in high resolution mass spectrometry
- Author
-
Taha, Hiba Mohammed, Aalizadeh, Reza, Alygizakis, Nikiforos, Antignac, Jean-Philippe, Arp, Hans Peter H., Bade, Richard, Baker, Nancy, Belova, Lidia, Bijlsma, Lubertus, Bolton, Evan E., Brack, Werner, Celma Tirado, Alberto, Chen, Wen-Ling, Cheng, Tiejun, Chirsir, Parviel, Cirka, L'ubos, D'Agostino, Lisa A., Feunang, Yannick Djoumbou, Dulio, Valeria, Fischer, Stellan, Gago-Ferrero, Pablo, Galani, Aikaterini, Geueke, Birgit, Glowacka, Natalia, Gluge, Juliane, Groh, Ksenia, Grosse, Sylvia, Haglund, Peter, Hakkinen, Pertti J., Hernandez, Felix, Janssen, Elisabeth M-L, Jonkers, Tim, Kiefer, Karin, Kirchner, Michal, Koschorreck, Jan, Krauss, Martin, Krier, Jessy, Lamoree, Marja H., Letzel, Marion, Letzel, Thomas, Li, Qingliang, Little, James, Liu, Yanna, Lunderberg, David M., Martin, Jonathan W., McEachran, Andrew D., McLean, John A., Meier, Christiane, Meijer, Jeroen, Menger, Frank, Merino, Carla, Muncke, Jane, Muschket, Matthias, Neumann, Michael, Neveu, Vanessa, Ng, Kelsey, Oberacher, Herbert, O'Brien, Jake, Oswald, Peter, Oswaldova, Martina, Picache, Jaqueline A., Postigo, Cristina, Ramirez, Noelia, Reemtsma, Thorsten, Renaud, Justin, Rostkowski, Pawel, Ruedel, Heinz, Salek, Reza M., Samanipour, Saer, Scheringer, Martin, Schliebner, Ivo, Schulz, Wolfgang, Schulze, Tobias, Sengl, Manfred, Shoemaker, Benjamin A., Sims, Kerry, Singer, Heinz, Singh, Randolph R., Sumarah, Mark, Thiessen, Paul A., Thomas, Kevin, Torres, Sonia, Trier, Xenia, van Wezel, Annemarie P., Vermeulen, Roel C. H., Vlaanderen, Jelle J., von der Ohe, Peter C., Wang, Zhanyun, Williams, Antony J., Willighagen, Egon L., Wishart, David S., Zhang, Jian, Thomaidis, Nikolaos S., Hollender, Juliane, Slobodnik, Jaroslav, and Schymanski, Emma L.
- Subjects
Environmental Sciences (social aspects to be 507) - Abstract
Background: The NORMAN Association (https://www.norman-.network.com/) initiated the NORMAN Suspect List Exchange (NORMAN-SLE; https://www.norman-.network.com/nds/SLE/) in 2015, following the NORMAN collaborative trial on non-target screening of environmental water samples by mass spectrometry. Since then, this exchange of information on chemicals that are expected to occur in the environment, along with the accompanying expert knowledge and references, has become a valuable knowledge base for "suspect screening" lists. The NORMAN-SLE now serves as a FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) chemical information resource worldwide.Results: The NORMAN-SLE contains 99 separate suspect list collections (as of May 2022) from over 70 contributors around the world, totalling over 100,000 unique substances. The substance classes include per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), pharmaceuticals, pesticides, natural toxins, high production volume substances covered under the European REACH regulation (EC: 1272/2008), priority contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) and regulatory lists from NORMAN partners. Several lists focus on transformation products (TPs) and complex features detected in the environment with various levels of provenance and structural information. Each list is available for separate download. The merged, curated collection is also available as the NORMAN Substance Database (NORMAN SusDat). Both the NORMAN-SLE and NORMAN SusDat are integrated within the NORMAN Database System (NDS). The individual NORMAN-SLE lists receive digital object identifiers (DOIs) and traceable versioning via a Zenodo community (https:// zenodo.org/communities/norman-.sle), with a total of > 40,000 unique views, > 50,000 unique downloads and 40 citations (May 2022). NORMAN-SLE content is progressively integrated into large open chemical databases such as PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and the US EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard (https://comptox. epa.gov/dashboard/), enabling further access to these lists, along with the additional functionality and calculated properties these resources offer. PubChem has also integrated significant annotation content from the NORMAN-SLE, including a classification browser (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/classification/#hid=101).Conclusions: The NORMAN-SLE offers a specialized service for hosting suspect screening lists of relevance for the environmental community in an open, FAIR manner that allows integration with other major chemical resources. These efforts foster the exchange of information between scientists and regulators, supporting the paradigm shift to the "one substance, one assessment" approach. New submissions are welcome via the contacts provided on the NORMAN-SLE website (https://www.norman-.network.com/nds/SLE/).
- Published
- 2022
10. An annotation database for chemicals of emerging concern in exposome research.
- Author
-
Meijer, Jeroen, Lamoree, Marja, Hamers, Timo, Antignac, Jean-Philippe, Hutinet, Sébastien, Debrauwer, Laurent, Covaci, Adrian, Huber, Carolin, Krauss, Martin, Walker, Douglas I., Schymanski, Emma L., Vermeulen, Roel, and Vlaanderen, Jelle
- Subjects
- *
ENVIRONMENTAL exposure , *INFORMATION retrieval , *CHEMICAL formulas , *INORGANIC compounds , *ANNOTATIONS - Abstract
• CECscreen is an annotation database for CECs in human biological samples. • CECscreen includes 70,397 structures, 306,071 simulated metabolites, and metadata. • CECscreen is openly accessible and is incorporated into Metfrag. • CECscreen facilitates large-scale detection of chemicals in exposome research. Chemicals of Emerging Concern (CECs) include a very wide group of chemicals that are suspected to be responsible for adverse effects on health, but for which very limited information is available. Chromatographic techniques coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) can be used for non-targeted screening and detection of CECs, by using comprehensive annotation databases. Establishing a database focused on the annotation of CECs in human samples will provide new insight into the distribution and extent of exposures to a wide range of CECs in humans. This study describes an approach for the aggregation and curation of an annotation database (CECscreen) for the identification of CECs in human biological samples. The approach consists of three main parts. First, CECs compound lists from various sources were aggregated and duplications and inorganic compounds were removed. Subsequently, the list was curated by standardization of structures to create "MS-ready" and "QSAR-ready" SMILES, as well as calculation of exact masses (monoisotopic and adducts) and molecular formulas. The second step included the simulation of Phase I metabolites. The third and final step included the calculation of QSAR predictions related to physicochemical properties, environmental fate, toxicity and Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion (ADME) processes and the retrieval of information from the US EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard. All CECscreen database and property files are publicly available (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3956586). In total, 145,284 entries were aggregated from various CECs data sources. After elimination of duplicates and curation, the pipeline produced 70,397 unique "MS-ready" structures and 66,071 unique QSAR-ready structures, corresponding with 69,526 CAS numbers. Simulation of Phase I metabolites resulted in 306,279 unique metabolites. QSAR predictions could be performed for 64,684 of the QSAR-ready structures, whereas information was retrieved from the CompTox Chemicals Dashboard for 59,739 CAS numbers out of 69,526 inquiries. CECscreen is incorporated in the in silico fragmentation approach MetFrag. The CECscreen database can be used to prioritize annotation of CECs measured in non-targeted HRMS, facilitating the large-scale detection of CECs in human samples for exposome research. Large-scale detection of CECs can be further improved by integrating the present database with resources that contain CECs (metabolites) and meta-data measurements, further expansion towards in silico and experimental (e.g. , MassBank) generation of MS/MS spectra, and development of bioinformatics approaches capable of using correlation patterns in the measured chemical features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Identifying antimicrobials and their metabolites in wastewater and surface water with effect-directed analysis.
- Author
-
Jonkers, Tim J.H., Keizers, Peter H.J., Béen, Frederic, Meijer, Jeroen, Houtman, Corine J., Al Gharib, Imane, Molenaar, Douwe, Hamers, Timo, and Lamoree, Marja H.
- Subjects
- *
METABOLITES , *WATER analysis , *ANTI-infective agents , *CLARITHROMYCIN , *SEWAGE , *ENVIRONMENTAL risk assessment - Abstract
This study aimed to identify antimicrobial contaminants in the aquatic environment with effect-directed analysis. Wastewater influent, effluent, and surface water (up- and downstream of the discharge location) were sampled at two study sites. The samples were enriched, subjected to high-resolution fractionation, and the resulting 80 fractions were tested in an antibiotics bioassay. The resulting bioactive fractions guided the suspect and nontargeted identification strategy in the high-resolution mass spectrometry data that was recorded in parallel. Chemical features were annotated with reference databases, assessed on annotation quality, and assigned identification confidence levels. To identify antibiotic metabolites, Phase I metabolites were predicted in silico for over 500 antibiotics and included as a suspect list. Predicted retention times and fragmentation patterns reduced the number of annotations to consider for confirmation testing. Overall, the bioactivity of three fractions could be explained by the identified antibiotics (clarithromycin and azithromycin) and an antibiotic metabolite (14-OH(R) clarithromycin), explaining 78% of the bioactivity measured at one study site. The applied identification strategy successfully identified antibiotic metabolites in the aquatic environment, emphasizing the need to include the toxic effects of bioactive metabolites in environmental risk assessments. [Display omitted] • An antibiotic bioassay confirmed bioactive fractions in fractionated water samples. • Chemical features related to bioactivity were prioritized for identification. • Phase I metabolites were predicted in silico for over 500 antibiotics. • A bioactive metabolite was identified as 14-OH(R) clarithromycin. • 78% of the measured bioactivity was explained by the identified compounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Towards evolutionary predictions: Current promises and challenges.
- Author
-
Wortel MT, Agashe D, Bailey SF, Bank C, Bisschop K, Blankers T, Cairns J, Colizzi ES, Cusseddu D, Desai MM, van Dijk B, Egas M, Ellers J, Groot AT, Heckel DG, Johnson ML, Kraaijeveld K, Krug J, Laan L, Lässig M, Lind PA, Meijer J, Noble LM, Okasha S, Rainey PB, Rozen DE, Shitut S, Tans SJ, Tenaillon O, Teotónio H, de Visser JAGM, Visser ME, Vroomans RMA, Werner GDA, Wertheim B, and Pennings PS
- Abstract
Evolution has traditionally been a historical and descriptive science, and predicting future evolutionary processes has long been considered impossible. However, evolutionary predictions are increasingly being developed and used in medicine, agriculture, biotechnology and conservation biology. Evolutionary predictions may be used for different purposes, such as to prepare for the future, to try and change the course of evolution or to determine how well we understand evolutionary processes. Similarly, the exact aspect of the evolved population that we want to predict may also differ. For example, we could try to predict which genotype will dominate, the fitness of the population or the extinction probability of a population. In addition, there are many uses of evolutionary predictions that may not always be recognized as such. The main goal of this review is to increase awareness of methods and data in different research fields by showing the breadth of situations in which evolutionary predictions are made. We describe how diverse evolutionary predictions share a common structure described by the predictive scope, time scale and precision. Then, by using examples ranging from SARS-CoV2 and influenza to CRISPR-based gene drives and sustainable product formation in biotechnology, we discuss the methods for predicting evolution, the factors that affect predictability and how predictions can be used to prevent evolution in undesirable directions or to promote beneficial evolution (i.e. evolutionary control). We hope that this review will stimulate collaboration between fields by establishing a common language for evolutionary predictions., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (© 2022 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.