Search

Myocardial infarction can be ruled out in patients with a single cardiac troponin measurement. Whether use of a uniform rule-out threshold has resulted in sex differences in care remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate implementation of a uniform rule-out threshold in females and males with possible myocardial infarction, and to derive and validate sex-specific thresholds. The implementation of a uniform rule-out threshold (<5 ng/L) with a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay was evaluated in consecutive patients presenting with possible myocardial infarction. The proportion of low-risk patients discharged from the emergency department and incidence of myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days were determined. Sex-specific thresholds were derived and validated, and proportion of female and male patients were stratified as low-risk compared with uniform threshold. In 16,792 patients (age 58 ± 17 years; 46% female) care was guided using a uniform threshold. This identified more female than male patients as low risk (73% vs 62%), but a similar proportion of low-risk patients were discharged from the emergency department (81% for both) with fewer than 5 (<0.1%) patients having a subsequent myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days. Compared with a uniform threshold of <5 ng/L, use of sex-specific thresholds would increase the proportion of female (61.8% vs 65.9%) and reduce the proportion of male (54.8% vs 47.8%) patients identified as low risk. Implementation of a uniform rule-out threshold for myocardial infarction was safe and effective in both sexes. Sex-specific rule-out thresholds should be considered, but their impact on effectiveness and safety may be limited. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are limited data around sex differences in the risk profile, treatments and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions in contemporary interventional practice. We investigated the impact of sex on clinical and procedural characteristics, complications and clinical outcomes in a national cohort. We created a longitudinal cohort (2006–2018, n = 30,605) of patients with stable angina who underwent CTO PCI in the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) database. Clinical, demographic, procedural and outcome data were analysed in two groups stratified by sex: male (n = 24,651), female (n = 5954). Female patients were older (68 vs 64 years, P < 0.001), had higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN) and prior stroke. Utilization of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), drug eluting stents (DES), radial or dual access and enabling strategies during CTO PCI were higher in male compared to female patients. Following multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference in in-patient mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR):1.40, 95 % CI: 0.75–2.61, P = 0.29) and major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (adjusted OR: 1.01, 95 % CI: 0.78–1.29, P = 0.96). The crude and adjusted rates of procedural complications (adjusted OR: 1.37, 95 % CI: 1.23–1.52, P < 0.001), coronary artery perforation (adjusted OR: 1.60, 95 % CI: 1.26–2.04, P < 0.001) and major bleeding (adjusted OR: 2.06, 95 % CI: 1.62–2.61, P < 0.001) were higher in women compared with men. Female patients treated by CTO PCI were older, underwent lesser complex procedures, but had higher adjusted risk of procedural complications with a similar adjusted risk of mortality and MACCE compared with male patients. • Limited data about clinical profile and outcomes of CTO PCI stratified by sex • In current study, women observed adjusted higher odds of procedural complications but similar odds of death & MACCE compared with men • Randomised control trial data are needed to validate these observational study findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]