Search

Many instances of severe damage to pile foundations and pile-supported infrastructures have been caused by liquefaction-induced lateral spreading during major earthquakes, particularly in coastal areas. The current study conducted a series of shaking table experiments to determine the differences between the responses of a free- and a fixed-head group pile under lateral spreading in the presence of finned and circular protection piles. The results indicated that the maximum bending moment tolerated by nonprotected free-head piles was more than that by fixed-head piles. Also, reductions in bending moments were more significant in free-head piles in the presence of protection piles than in fixed-head piles. The bending moments of front and rear piles under restricted pile head conditions were reduced by about 31% and 21%, respectively, when finned piles were used as protection piles, while they were 34% and 42%, respectively, under free-head conditions. Furthermore, modification factors of recommended lateral pressure distribution along a pile per the current design code were determined for the protected and nonprotected free- and fixed-head pile groups of the current study and it was observed that this modification factor (CL) was highly dependent on the location of piles in a group, pile head conditions, and the presence of protection piles in the lateral spreading analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Shake table experiments are conducted to assess the potential of the polymer injection technique as a liquefaction countermeasure. A large 2.9 m high (10 ft) laminar soil container on a 3.9×1.85 m (13×6 ft) shake table is employed. Mitigation of liquefaction-induced settlement for a shallow foundation is explored. In a series of two shake table experiments, the system response is studied first without (baseline) and subsequently with polymer injected into the liquefiable stratum. Each test is densely instrumented to provide insights into the dynamic response of the soil and foundation system. Furthermore, cone penetration tests (CPTs) are performed pre- and postinjection to assess the extent of soil improvement. Strong base excitation is imparted by the shake table, resulting in liquefaction and excessive foundation settlement in the original baseline test. In the second test, with the polymer injection countermeasure, a significant reduction is observed in the tendency for liquefaction and the resulting foundation settlement. After this test, careful excavation provided additional insights into the polymer's configuration within the deposit, increasing overall soil relative density, confinement and creating solidified paths for the shallow foundation load toward the lower, more competent stratum. As such, these mechanisms have the potential to allow for: (1) an increase in soil resistance to liquefaction, and (2) a significant reduction in settlement of overlying shallow foundations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]