7 results on '"Cohen, Deborah J."'
Search Results
2. Effective Facilitator Strategies for Supporting Primary Care Practice Change: A Mixed Methods Study.
- Author
-
Sweeney, Shannon M., Baron, Andrea, Hall, Jennifer D., Ezekiel-Herrera, David, Springer, Rachel, Ward, Rikki L., Marino, Miguel, Balasubramanian, Bijal A., and Cohen, Deborah J.
- Subjects
PROCESS capability ,PRIMARY care ,COMPARATIVE method ,SMOKING cessation ,BLOOD pressure ,FERRANS & Powers Quality of Life Index ,MEDICAL care ,PRIMARY health care ,QUALITY assurance ,ASPIRIN ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,RESEARCH funding ,PERSONALITY tests - Abstract
Purpose: Practice facilitation is an evidence-informed implementation strategy to support quality improvement (QI) and aid practices in aligning with best evidence. Few studies, particularly of this size and scope, identify strategies that contribute to facilitator effectiveness.Methods: We conducted a sequential mixed methods study, analyzing data from EvidenceNOW, a large-scale QI initiative. Seven regional cooperatives employed 162 facilitators to work with 1,630 small or medium-sized primary care practices. Main analyses were based on facilitators who worked with at least 4 practices. Facilitators were defined as more effective if at least 75% of their practices improved on at least 1 outcome measure-aspirin use, blood pressure control, smoking cessation counseling (ABS), or practice change capacity, measured using Change Process Capability Questionnaire-from baseline to follow-up. Facilitators were defined as less effective if less than 50% of their practices improved on these outcomes. Using an immersion crystallization and comparative approach, we analyzed observational and interview data to identify strategies associated with more effective facilitators.Results: Practices working with more effective facilitators had a 3.6% greater change in the mean percentage of patients meeting the composite ABS measure compared with practices working with less effective facilitators (P <.001). More effective facilitators cultivated motivation by tailoring QI work and addressing resistance, guided practices to think critically, and provided accountability to support change, using these strategies in combination. They were able to describe their work in detail. In contrast, less effective facilitators seldom used these strategies and described their work in general terms. Facilitator background, experience, and work on documentation did not differentiate between more and less effective facilitators.Conclusions: Facilitation strategies that differentiate more and less effective facilitators have implications for enhancing facilitator development and training, and can assist all facilitators to more effectively support practice changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Improving Smoking and Blood Pressure Outcomes: The Interplay Between Operational Changes and Local Context.
- Author
-
Cohen, Deborah J., Sweeney, Shannon M., Miller, William L., Hall, Jennifer D., Miech, Edward J., Springer, Rachel J., Balasubramanian, Bijal A., Damschroder, Laura, and Marino, Miguel
- Subjects
- *
MEDICAL care surveys , *BLOOD pressure , *MEDICAL care , *SMOKING , *SMOKE , *SMOKE prevention - Abstract
Purpose: We undertook a study to identify conditions and operational changes linked to improvements in smoking and blood pressure (BP) outcomes in primary care.Methods: We purposively sampled and interviewed practice staff (eg, office managers, clinicians) from a subset of 104 practices participating in EvidenceNOW-a multisite cardiovascular disease prevention initiative. We calculated Clinical Quality Measure improvements, with targets of 10-point or greater absolute improvements in the proportion of patients with smoking screening and, if relevant, counseling and in the proportion of hypertensive patients with adequately controlled BP. We analyzed interview data to identify operational changes, transforming these into numeric data. We used Configurational Comparative Methods to assess the joint effects of multiple factors on outcomes.Results: In clinician-owned practices, implementing a workflow to routinely screen, counsel, and connect patients to smoking cessation resources, or implementing a documentation change or a referral to a resource alone led to an improvement of at least 10 points in the smoking outcome with a moderate level of facilitation support. These patterns did not manifest in health- or hospital system-owned practices or in Federally Qualified Health Centers, however. The BP outcome improved by at least 10 points among solo practices after medical assistants were trained to take an accurate BP. Among larger, clinician-owned practices, BP outcomes improved when practices implemented a second BP measurement when the first was elevated, and when staff learned where to document this information in the electronic health record. With 50 hours or more of facilitation, BP outcomes improved among larger and health- and hospital system-owned practices that implemented these operational changes.Conclusions: There was no magic bullet for improving smoking or BP outcomes. Multiple combinations of operational changes led to improvements, but only in specific contexts of practice size and ownership, or dose of external facilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Effects of Practice Turnover on Primary Care Quality Improvement Implementation.
- Author
-
Baron, Andrea N., Hemler, Jennifer R., Sweeney, Shannon M., Tate Woodson, Tanisha, Cuthel, Allison, Crabtree, Benjamin F., and Cohen, Deborah J.
- Abstract
Primary care practices often engage in quality improvement (QI) in order to stay current and meet quality benchmarks, but the extent to which turnover affects practices' QI ability is not well described. The authors examined qualitative data from practice staff and external facilitators participating in a large-scale QI initiative to understand the relationship between turnover and QI efforts. The examination found turnover can limit practices' ability to engage in QI activities in various ways. When a staff member leaves, remaining staff often absorb additional responsibilities, and QI momentum slows as new staff are trained or existing staff are reengaged. Turnover alters staff dynamics and can create barriers to constructive working relationships and team building. When key practice members leave, they can take with them institutional memory about QI purpose, processes, and long-term vision. Understanding how turnover affects QI may help practices, and those helping them with QI, manage the disruptive effects of turnover. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Facilitating Practice Transformation in Frontline Health Care.
- Author
-
Phillips Jr, Robert L., Cohen, Deborah J., Kaufman, Arthur, Dickinson, W. Perry, Cykert, Samuel, and Phillips, Robert L Jr
- Subjects
- *
MEDICAL care , *HEALTH information technology , *ORGANIZATIONAL change , *PROFESSIONAL practice - Abstract
Practice transformation, organizational change, innovation, quality improvement, professional practice, health extension, outreach, practice facilitation, primary care, burnout, health information technology, practice-based research. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Use of Quality Improvement Strategies Among Small to Medium-Size US Primary Care Practices.
- Author
-
Balasubramanian, Bijal A., Marino, Miguel, Cohen, Deborah J., Ward, Rikki L., Preston, Alex, Springer, Rachel J., Lindner, Stephan R., Edwards, Samuel, McConnell, K. John, Crabtree, Benjamin F., Miller, William L., Stange, Kurt C., and Solberg, Leif I.
- Subjects
MEDICAL care ,PRIMARY care ,HEART ,ELECTRONIC health records ,PUBLIC health ,HYGIENE ,QUALITY control - Abstract
Purpose: Improving primary care quality is a national priority, but little is known about the extent to which small to medium-size practices use quality improvement (QI) strategies to improve care. We examined variations in use of QI strategies among 1,181 small to medium-size primary care practices engaged in a national initiative spanning 12 US states to improve quality of care for heart health and assessed factors associated with those variations.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, practice characteristics were assessed by surveying practice leaders. Practice use of QI strategies was measured by the validated Change Process Capability Questionnaire (CPCQ) Strategies Scale (scores range from -28 to 28, with higher scores indicating more use of QI strategies). Multivariable linear regression was used to examine the association between practice characteristics and the CPCQ strategies score.Results: The mean CPCQ strategies score was 9.1 (SD = 12.2). Practices that participated in accountable care organizations and those that had someone in the practice to configure clinical quality reports from electronic health records (EHRs), had produced quality reports, or had discussed clinical quality data during meetings had higher CPCQ strategies scores. Health system-owned practices and those experiencing major disruptive changes, such as implementing a new EHR system or clinician turnover, had lower CPCQ strategies scores.Conclusion: There is substantial variation in the use of QI strategies among small to medium-size primary care practices across 12 US states. Findings suggest that practices may need external support to strengthen their ability to do QI and to be prepared for new payment and delivery models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. A national evaluation of a dissemination and implementation initiative to enhance primary care practice capacity and improve cardiovascular disease care: the ESCALATES study protocol.
- Author
-
Cohen, Deborah J., Balasubramanian, Bijal A., Gordon, Leah, Marino, Miguel, Ono, Sarah, Solberg, Leif I., Crabtree, Benjamin F., Stange, Kurt C., Davis, Melinda, Miller, William L., Damschroder, Laura J., McConnell, K. John, and Creswell, John
- Subjects
- *
CARDIOVASCULAR disease treatment , *PRIMARY care , *ELECTRONIC health records , *METASTASIS , *CARDIOVASCULAR disease prevention , *COMMUNICATION , *EXPERIMENTAL design , *LONGITUDINAL method , *MEDICAL care research , *PRIMARY health care , *RESEARCH funding , *EVALUATION of human services programs - Abstract
Background: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) launched the EvidenceNOW Initiative to rapidly disseminate and implement evidence-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) preventive care in smaller primary care practices. AHRQ funded eight grantees (seven regional Cooperatives and one independent national evaluation) to participate in EvidenceNOW. The national evaluation examines quality improvement efforts and outcomes for more than 1500 small primary care practices (restricted to those with fewer than ten physicians per clinic). Examples of external support include practice facilitation, expert consultation, performance feedback, and educational materials and activities. This paper describes the study protocol for the EvidenceNOW national evaluation, which is called Evaluating System Change to Advance Learning and Take Evidence to Scale (ESCALATES).Methods: This prospective observational study will examine the portfolio of EvidenceNOW Cooperatives using both qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data include: online implementation diaries, observation and interviews at Cooperatives and practices, and systematic assessment of context from the perspective of Cooperative team members. Quantitative data include: practice-level performance on clinical quality measures (aspirin prescribing, blood pressure and cholesterol control, and smoking cessation; ABCS) collected by Cooperatives from electronic health records (EHRs); practice and practice member surveys to assess practice capacity and other organizational and structural characteristics; and systematic tracking of intervention delivery. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods analyses will be conducted to examine how Cooperatives organize to provide external support to practices, to compare effectiveness of the dissemination and implementation approaches they implement, and to examine how regional variations and other organization and contextual factors influence implementation and effectiveness.Discussion: ESCALATES is a national evaluation of an ambitious large-scale dissemination and implementation effort focused on transforming smaller primary care practices. Insights will help to inform the design of national health care practice extension systems aimed at supporting practice transformation efforts in the USA.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02560428 (09/21/15). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.