Search

Hoarded homes can pose a threat to public safety, with heightened risks of fire hazards, pest infestations and noxious odours in both the home and neighbouring dwellings. Communities across North America are responding to these public safety concerns through a harm reduction approach. This descriptive study explores the implementation and outcomes of the City of Vancouver's approach involving a partnership between fire prevention and public health. Data were collected from the team's 2016–2018 case tracking systems, consisting of health records and team intervention record, as well as notes taken from case briefing meetings. Study objectives included describing the intervention model, providing descriptive statistics on clients and their clutter volume, the interventions undertaken, and exploring predictors of clutter volume and case outcome through exploratory analyses. The sample included 82 cases involving severely hoarded conditions or more moderate hoarding conditions paired with additional client vulnerabilities (e.g. health conditions, frailty). Results from paired samples t‐tests and regression analysis, suggest the Hoarding Action Response Team's (HART) model of a community‐based intervention for hoarding was associated with clutter reduction and tenancy preservation. HART successfully maintained engagement with most clients, and most cases were closed within six home visits. Despite these successes, the team dealt with several barriers including client avoidance and limited resources. This paper provides guidance for communities who are working to develop a coordinated response to problems associated with hoarding and begins to establish expectations for what can be achieved through a community‐based hoarding intervention model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Moral distress occurs when one knows a morally correct action to take but feels powerless to act the way one believes is right. Moral distress has been studied in many contexts but there remains a gap in our understanding of the phenomenon as it manifests outside of hospital‐based settings. The aim of this study was to explore the nature of the moral distress experience among community‐based health and social care professionals working with older adults and their caregivers. Using a qualitative constructionist design, we interviewed 24 participants from a single health authority in southwestern Ontario, Canada. Participants were both urban and rurally based. Data were collected in the winter and summer of 2020 and analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis strategy. Three factors: reluctant clients, human resource shortages and system challenges, contributed to the creation of perceived morally precarious care plans, resulting in symptoms of moral distress. Study participants described frustration, guilt, anger, and grief at not being able to act consistently with their core values and provide the amount and/or quality of care their clients and unpaid caregivers deserved. We consider possible reasons for our finding that community service providers did not always respond to the consequences of moral distress symptoms in a manner similar to those in acute care contexts. Our findings suggest that study participants may have been able to cultivate moral resilience in the face of moral distress through the positive reframing of adversity and therefore maintain their overall sense of moral integrity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical reasoning (CR) is the cognitive process that therapists use to plan, direct, perform and reflect on client care. Linked to intervention efficiency and quality, CR is a core competency that occurs within an institutional context (legal, regulatory, administrative and organisational elements). Because this context can shape how community therapists think about their clients' care, its involvement in their CR could have a major impact on the interventions delivered. However, little is known about this involvement. Our study thus aimed to describe the elements of the institutional context involved in community therapists' CR. From March 2012 to June 2014, we conducted an institutional ethnography (IE) inquiry in three Health and Social Services Centres in Québec (Canada). We observed participants and conducted semi‐structured interviews with 10 occupational therapists. We also interviewed 12 secondary key informants (colleagues and managers) and collected administrative documents (n = 50). We analysed data using the IE process. Of the 13 elements of the institutional context identified, we found that four are almost constantly involved in participants' CR. These four elements, that is, institutional procedures, organisation's basket of services, occupational therapists' mandate and wait times for their services, restrictively shape CR. Specifically, occupational therapists restrict their representation of the client's situation and exploration of potential solutions to what is possible within the bounds of these four elements. In light of such restrictions on the way they think about their clients' care, therapists should pay close attention to the elements of their own institutional context and how they are involved in their CR. Because of its potentially important impact on the future of professions (e.g. further restrictions on professionals' role, reduced contribution to population health and well‐being), this involvement of the institutional context in CR concerns all professionals, be they clinicians, educators, researchers or regulatory college officers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. With community-dwelling elders waiting to adapt their bathroom, Health and Social Services Centers in Quebec (Canada) combined human resources through cross-skilling within interdisciplinary teams. To this end, occupational therapists implemented in-house "tools" to support nonoccupational therapists in selecting bathing equipment. However, unknown psychometric properties of those in-house "tools" cast doubt on the quality of service provided to elders. Little is also known about the best processes to use to support the deimplementation of such nonevidence-based practices. This study presents the effect of a knowledge transfer and exchange intervention designed to deimplement in-house "tools" and replace them with an evidence-based tool (Algo). Methods. Censuses were conducted with the 94 Health and Social Services Centers of Quebec providing homecare services, before and after the knowledge transfer and exchange intervention (2009-2013). In 2013, the deimplementation of in-house "tools" and their replacement by Algo were measured with Knott and Wildavsky's levels of utilization. Results. Cross-skilling within interdisciplinary teams increased between censuses (87% to 98%), as did use of in-house "tools" (67% to 81%). Algo's uptake started during the knowledge transfer and exchange process as 25 Health and Social Services Centers achieved the first level of utilization. Nonetheless, no Health and Social Services Center deimplemented the in-house "tools" to use Algo. Conclusion. The knowledge transfer and exchange process led to the development of a scientifically sound clinical tool (Algo) and challenged the status quo in clinical settings regarding the use of nonevidence-based practices. However, the deimplementation of in-use practices has not yet been observed. This study highlights the need to act proactively on the deimplementation and implementation processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Informal carers, also referred to as partners in care, provide the bulk of care to people living with dementia across a range of community settings; however, the changing experiences and contexts of providing informal care for people with dementia in rural settings are under-studied. Drawing on 27 semi-structured interviews with former partners in care in Southwestern and Northern Ontario, Canada, we examine experiences of providing and accessing care over the course of the condition and across various settings. Our findings illustrate the challenges associated with navigating the system of care, finding people who understand dementia in the surrounding community, negotiating hours of home support, facing resistance to respite from the person with dementia, and feeling pressured into long-term care. We argue that partners' time, bodies and choices are spatially constrained within rural and small-town settings and the current systems of home, community and long-term care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]