Search

Systemic AL amyloidosis is one of the most frequently diagnosed forms of systemic amyloidosis. It arises from mutational changes in immunoglobulin light chains. To explore whether these mutations may affect the structure of the formed fibrils, we determine and compare the fibril structures from several patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis. All patients are affected by light chains that contain an IGLV3-19 gene segment, and the deposited fibrils differ by the mutations within this common germ line background. Using cryo-electron microscopy, we here find different fibril structures in each patient. These data establish that the mutations of amyloidogenic light chains contribute to defining the fibril architecture and hence the structure of the pathogenic agent. Systemic AL amyloidosis is one of the most frequently diagnosed forms of systemic amyloidosis. Here the authors analyse the structures of AL amyloid fibrils with different light chain mutations and show that the mutations contribute to defining the fibril structure in different patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is a progressive, fatal disease leading to heart failure due to accumulation of amyloid fibrils in the interstitial space and may occur as a hereditary (ATTRv) or wild-type (ATTRwt) form. Guidelines recommend the use of ACE inhibitors (ACEis) and beta-blockers (BBs) as heart failure therapy (HFT) in all patients with symptomatic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, independent of the underlying etiology. However, the prognostic benefit of ACEis and BBs in ATTR has not been elucidated in detail yet. We thus sought to retrospectively investigate the outcome of patients with ATTRwt or ATTRv under HFT. Methods: Medical records of 403 patients with cardiac ATTR (ATTRwt: n = 268, ATTRv: n = 135) were screened for long-term medication as well as clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data. Patients were assessed between 2005 and 2020 at the University Hospital Heidelberg. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to analyze potential differences in survival among different subgroups. Results: The mean follow-up was 28 months. In total, 43 patients (32%) with ATTRv and 140 patients (52%) with ATTRwt received HFT. Survival was significantly shorter in patients receiving HFT in ATTRv (46 vs. 83 months, p = 0.0007) vs. non-HFT. A significantly better survival was observed in patients with comorbidities (coronary artery disease, arterial hypertension) and HFT among ATTRwt patients (p = 0.004). No significant differences in survival were observed in the other subgroups. Conclusions: Survival analysis revealed a potential benefit of HFT in patients with ATTRwt and cardiac comorbidities such as coronary artery disease and/or arterial hypertension. In contrast, HFT should be used with caution in patients with ATTRv. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Wildtype transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy is an under‐recognized cause of heart failure in elderly patients. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair is a newly emerging therapeutic option for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). We present first insights into safety and possible benefits of this procedure in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. Methods and results: Eight patients with cardiac non‐hereditary (wildtype) transthyretin (ATTRwt) amyloidosis and severe to torrential TR, undergoing successful transcatheter tricuspid valve repair, were included in the analysis and compared to a control group of 21 patients without cardiac amyloidosis. All patients presented with an advanced stage of amyloid cardiomyopathy. Primary endpoint was reduction in TR at 3 months follow‐up. Secondary endpoints were feasibility, safety, hospitalization or death, clinical improvement, cardiac biomarkers, and structural and functional right heart parameter obtained by echocardiography. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair resulted in a significant reduction of TR (IV to II, P = 0.008) in all eight patients with cardiac amyloidosis (100%). Device success (amyloidosis 75% vs. control group 86%, P = 0.597) and overall probability of hospitalization or death (amyloidosis 13% vs. control group 25%, P = 0.646) were similar compared with those in the control group at 3 months follow‐up. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair led to an improvement of New York Heart Association functional class (P = 0.031) and 6 min walking distance (from 313 ± 118 to 337 ± 106, P = 0.012). TR reduction in amyloidosis patients was less extensive compared with that in control group (TR‐reduction 1.6 ± 0.3, P = 0.008 vs. control group 2.3 ± 0.3, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, these patients showed no significant improvement of structural right heart parameters. Conclusions: Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair is a safe and feasible new treatment option in patients with amyloid cardiomyopathy and has the potential to improve TR‐grade and clinical status. However, the benefit appears to be less pronounced compared with patients without cardiac amyloidosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare and debilitating disease. Advances have been made in new treatments in recent years, yet real-world data on the management of the disease are scarce. EMN23 is a retrospective, observational study of patients who initiated first-line treatment in 2004–2018 in Europe, presenting the demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes, from 4480 patients. Regimens based on bortezomib were the most frequently used as first-line therapy; only 6.2% of the patients received autologous stem cell transplant. Hematologic responses improved post-2010 (67.1% vs 55.6% pre-2010). The median overall survival (OS) was 48.8 (45.2–51.7) months; 51.4 (47.3–57.7) months pre-2010 and 46.7 (41.3–52.2) months post-2010. Early mortality was 13.4% and did not improve (11.4% vs 14.4% pre- and post-2010); furthermore, it remained high in patients with advanced cardiac disease (over 39% for stage IIIb). There was a significant improvement for stage IIIa (14.2 vs 30.7 months, p = 0.0170) but no improvement for stage IIIb patients (5.0 vs 4.5 months). This European real-world study of AL-amyloidosis emphasizes the unmet needs of early diagnosis, and the lack of improvement in survival outcomes of the frail stage IIIb population, despite the introduction of new therapies in recent years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) has strong prognostic implications and is associated with heart failure. Recently, myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) was identified as a useful marker for specifically identifying cardiac amyloidosis (CA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MCF for the discrimination of different forms of LVH. Methods and results We analysed cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) scans of patients with CA (n = 132), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM, n = 60), hypertensive heart disease (HHD, n = 38) and in 100 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. MCF was calculated by dividing left ventricular (LV) stroke volume by LV myocardial volume. The diagnostic accuracy of MCF was compared to that of LV ejection fraction (EF) and the mass index (MI). Compared with controls (136.3 ± 24.4%, P < 0.05), mean values for MCF were significantly reduced in LVH (HHD:92.6 ± 20%, HCM:80 ± 20.3%, transthyretin CA:74.9 ± 32.2% and light-chain (AL) CA:50.5 ± 21.4%). MCF performed better than LVEF (AUC = 0.96 vs. AUC= 0.6, P < 0.001) and was comparable to LVMI (AUC = 0.95, P = 0.4) in discriminating LVH from controls. There was a significant yet weak correlation between MCF and LVEF (r = 0.43, P < 0.0001). MCF outperformed LVEF and LVMI in discriminating between different etiologies of LVH and between AL and other forms of LVH (AUC = 0.84, P < 0.0001). Moreover, cut-off values for MCF <50% and LVEF <60% allowed to identify patients with high probability for CA. Conclusion In patients with heart failure MCF discriminates CA from other forms of LVH. As it can easily be derived from standard, non-contrast cine images, it may be a very useful marker in the diagnostic workup of patients with LVH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]