1. You Just Keep on Pushing My Love over the Borderline: A Rejoinder
- Author
-
Daniel Simpson, Håvard Rue, Andrea Riebler, Sigrunn Holbek Sørbye, and Thiago G. Martins
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Statistics and Probability ,Psychoanalysis ,General Mathematics ,01 natural sciences ,VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Matematikk: 410 ,VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Mathematics: 410 ,010104 statistics & probability ,03 medical and health sciences ,030104 developmental biology ,0101 mathematics ,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty ,Mathematics - Abstract
Source at https://doi.org/10.1214/17-sts576rej. INTRODUCTION: The point of departure for our paper is that most modern statistical models are built to be flexible enough to model diverse data generating mechanisms. Good statistical practice requires us to limit this flexibility, which is typically controlled by a small number of parameters, to the amount “needed” to model the data at hand. The Bayesian framework provides a natural method for doing this although, as DD points out, this trend for penalising model complexity casts a broad shadow over all of modern statistics and data science.The PC prior framework argues for setting priors on these flexibility parameters that are specifically built to penalise a certain type of complexity and avoid overfitting. The discussants raised various points about this core idea. First, DD pointed out that while over-fitting a model is a bad thing, under-fitting is not better: we do not want Occam’s razor to slit our throat. We saw this behaviour when using a half-Normal prior on the distance, while the exponential prior does not lead to obvious attenuation of the estimates. This is confirmed experimentally by Klein and Kneib (2016).
- Published
- 2017