Search

This document discusses a research paper that proposes a modified method for evaluating the stability of deep excavations in soft clays. The discussion raises concerns about the proposed method and questions the assumptions made by the authors. It suggests alternative explanations for the observed behavior of excavations in soft clays and criticizes the models used in the study for not accurately representing actual ground movement patterns caused by excavation. The author invites the study authors to respond to these criticisms. [Extracted from the article]

Ground fissure is the most common geological catastrophe phenomenon in Xi'an, posing a major security threat to the currently developing urban cloud rail transit system. In this paper, a 3D-FEM calculation model is established to study the influence of the intersection angles between the hidden ground fissure and the cloud rail on the deformation and failure characteristics of the structure. The findings indicate that the pile foundation is under tension in the main deformation area of the hanging wall of the ground fissure, and the negative friction zone (NFZ) appears below the neutral point (buried depth 18 m for intersection angle 30°). The pile foundation is under compression in the footwall, and the pressure it bears is less than the tensile force sustained by the hanging wall pile, and the NFZ is above the middle point. The NFZ of the pile foundation in the hanging wall and footwall increases as the intersection angle decreases. The pile foundation mainly undergoes vertical settlement, and the horizontal displacement is relatively small. The 3D movement of the pile foundation results in settlement and inclination of the superstructure of the cloud rail simply supported beam bridge, such as the pier and track beam. Therefore, the cloud rail bridge should span the ground fissure at a large angle as far as possible, and 3D adjustable support should be adopted to adjust the offset of the track beam caused by the ground fissure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Shake table experiments are conducted to assess the potential of the polymer injection technique as a liquefaction countermeasure. A large 2.9 m high (10 ft) laminar soil container on a 3.9×1.85 m (13×6 ft) shake table is employed. Mitigation of liquefaction-induced settlement for a shallow foundation is explored. In a series of two shake table experiments, the system response is studied first without (baseline) and subsequently with polymer injected into the liquefiable stratum. Each test is densely instrumented to provide insights into the dynamic response of the soil and foundation system. Furthermore, cone penetration tests (CPTs) are performed pre- and postinjection to assess the extent of soil improvement. Strong base excitation is imparted by the shake table, resulting in liquefaction and excessive foundation settlement in the original baseline test. In the second test, with the polymer injection countermeasure, a significant reduction is observed in the tendency for liquefaction and the resulting foundation settlement. After this test, careful excavation provided additional insights into the polymer's configuration within the deposit, increasing overall soil relative density, confinement and creating solidified paths for the shallow foundation load toward the lower, more competent stratum. As such, these mechanisms have the potential to allow for: (1) an increase in soil resistance to liquefaction, and (2) a significant reduction in settlement of overlying shallow foundations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to the large demand to produce clean and renewable energy, offshore wind farms are extensively being used to help with economic development. Offshore Wind Turbine (OWT) structures are usually supported by various types of foundations and its selection depends on several factors such as water depth, economic costs, construction methodologies, seabed bathymetry, soil characteristics, and load characteristics. The present State-of-the-Art review focuses on OWT-monopile foundation systems embedded in multi-layered soil strata subjected to aerodynamic and hydrodynamic loading conditions. The purpose of this study is to carry out a comprehensive review on the performance of OWT-monopile foundation structures to support the design and drafting choices and thereby provide an understanding to reduce the costs. Two specific subject areas are addressed in this paper: (1) Factors affecting the performance of OWT-Monopile Foundation Systems; and (2) Experimental modeling and numerical analyses of OWT-Monopile Foundation Systems. The immediate challenge to the design of OWTs is to analyze the dynamic response of the foundation structure when exposed to both aerodynamic and hydrodynamic loads acting simultaneously. The limitations of the existing guidelines point to the need for improved design methods to obtain an economical design of OWT-monopile foundations. The use of Finite Element (FE) models is effective in studying the functioning of OWT-monopile structures. The present study suggests the development of further numerical models and modifications to the existing ones to properly assess soil-monopile interactions. This study also suggests further investigations on the design and analysis of OWT-monopile foundations considering the effect of (i) aerodynamic and hydrodynamic loading conditions with soil-monopile interactions, and (ii) multi-layered seabed characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study proposed an analytical approach for predicting the end-bearing capacity of driven piles that are subjected to axial loads in saturated and unsaturated soils. This is a generalized approach in which the stress characteristic method is employed successfully for both saturated and unsaturated soils. An iterative technique computer code was developed for the proposed analytical approach extending the finite difference method to develop solutions with the aid of MATLAB (version 2019a) that provides graphical output to visualize the results. The results from the proposed approach were compared against measurements for 13 pile load tests that include 11 in saturated soils and 2 in unsaturated soils, with good agreement. In addition, numerical analyses were performed using ABAQUS (version 6.14) to simulate the driven pile penetration and pile loading by employing the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian adaptive mesh methods. The comparisons between the numerical predictions and measurements from a published model pile test suggested that the ultimate bearing capacity is well predicted by the finite-element model in comparison to the proposed analytical method. However, the proposed analytical method was simple for use in engineering practice applications to estimate the end-bearing capacity of pile foundations in both saturated and unsaturated soils. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The serviceability limit of the foundation system plays an important role in the safe long-term performance of a building. Under governing load cases in service life, the building foundation system should satisfy the serviceability limit state, i.e., total and differential settlement criteria. This study investigated the distress of a building through foundation performance assessment incorporating the soil–foundation–structure interaction (SFSI) effects. A spatially variable soil model [zonewise, obtained from field observation and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) study] was used to obtain the settlement of the foundation system. Engineering properties of the subsurface were estimated from the collected soil samples and field tests. ERT result shows the variability of the subsurface layer. A three-dimensional finite-element model of soil, foundations, and structures was developed to estimate the settlement demand of the foundation and structures. The numerical model includes the geometric variability of all the foundations of the building and subsurface variability. Settlement and bearing capacity demand of the foundations were estimated and compared with the standard provisions. Results obtained show that the building foundation system satisfies the serviceability limit of the foundation system under total settlement criteria. However, the differential settlement of the system exceeds the required limit despite considering the SFSI effects, and is one of the major causes of distress to the building. The main contributions of this study also include establishing the spatial variability of the soil layer through ERT and correlating it with the crack zone in the building. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The damage caused by seismic shaking and liquefaction-induced permanent ground deformation has conventionally been assessed as two separate problems often by different engineers. However, the two problems are inherently linked, since ground shaking causes liquefaction, and liquefaction-induced soil softening affects ground shaking. Modelling both problems within a single numerical model is complex for both the engineer and the software, and most finite element software only have the capabilities to address one of them. To improve the estimates of the seismic performance of buildings on liquefiable soil, a new sub-structuring approach is proposed called the macro-mechanism approach. This approach allows the soil-liquefaction-foundation-structure interaction to be considered in a series of sub-models accounting for the major nonlinear mechanisms of the system at a macro level. The proposed approach was implemented in the open-source finite element software OpenSees and then applied to a case study of a building where significant liquefaction- and shaking-induced damage was observed after the 1999 Mw 7.4 Kocaeli Earthquake. The case study building was also simulated using two different commercial software programs, the finite difference software FLAC, and the finite element software PLAXIS, by two different research teams. A comparison between the results from the macro-mechanism approach compared to full numerical models shows that the macro-mechanism approach can capture the extent of the foundation deformation and provide more realistic estimates of the building damage than full approaches since the FLAC and PLAXIS models consider elastic elements for the building. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rigid inclusion technique has been used worldwide to reinforce soft soil for road and railway embankments and deep building foundations. This technique is studied through field tests and physical and numerical models. Most studies focus on embankments or slabs on soils reinforced with rigid inclusions. Previous research based on numerical modeling demonstrated that the load-transfer mechanisms for a rigid slab differ from those for an embankment. Here, a simplified physical model was developed to assess the load-transfer mechanism between the inclusion head and the load-transfer platform (LTP) under a rigid slab. This research focused on the use of an alternative material for the LTP, which is a compacted soil with or without cement. When the reinforced soil contribution is neglected, the LTP weight and applied load are transmitted completely to the inclusion cap (load-transfer efficiency of 100%). As the LTP material stiffness increases, the settlement magnitude decreases considerably. The experiments demonstrated that the applied load was transferred to the inclusion head through an inverted truncated load-transfer cone (LTC) over the inclusion; the external angle depended on the LTP material strength in accordance with Coulomb's theory. The principal stress state at the base of the LTC also was determined. Equations are proposed to determine LTP thickness and inclusion spacing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Soft soil foundations are often encountered in engineering construction. To make the foundation meet the engineering strength and deformation requirements, the soft soil foundation must be treated. Based on bucket foundation and silt solidification technology, the new grid composite foundation is proposed. The strength improvement mechanism of the new type foundation was analyzed according to the Mohr-Coulomb strength theory, and numerical simulations are used to carry out research on the bearing characteristics of the grid composite foundation. By carrying out load simulations for the grid foundation with different foundation widths, the failure modes corresponding to different B/L were analyzed. With overall consideration of the side length of a solidifying grid, the foundation width, and the undrained shear strength of the soil mass, the calculation method for the bearing capacity of the grid composite foundation has been proposed. Moreover, a wall strength check is carried out according to the maximum pull stress of the solidified wall. In the field test, the results of the finite element simulation and the field test are in good agreement, further verifying the feasibility of the grid structure foundation. Thus, a theoretical reference for engineering design is provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Combined piled raft foundation (CPRF) is an effective solution for supporting high-rise constructions. The traditional design philosophy of CPRF does not consider the capacity of foundation based on combined vertical (V), horizontal (H), and moment (M) load. However, V-M-H load acts on the CPRF system concurrently due to the action of wind, wave, earth pressure, and earthquake loading in addition to gravity loading. In this context, the present investigation deals with the effect of combined V-M-H load interaction on the behavior of CPRF in sand and clay, respectively. The response of CPRF under combined loading is obtained using a 3D finite element analysis. First, validation of the numerical model is performed considering the model test results conducted in Agartala sand and another based on the available field test result of Messeturm Tower in Frankfurt clay obtained from the literature. Further, failure and design envelopes for the validated CPRF system are developed considering V-M-H load in both sand and clay deposits attributing a variety of influential system parameters. Simplified expressions for design lateral and moment capacities are proposed based on multiple linear regression analysis. Finally, the implication in design based on the findings of the present study is illustrated using a prototype case study structure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Issue 1 The authors employed three-dimensional (3D) finite-element software Plaxis 3D ([1]) to model a ring foundation in a cohesive soil, where a quarter of the problem domain (i.e., a 90° sector of the domain) was discretized. The authors employed the commercial finite-element software, namely, Plaxis 3D, to determine the ultimate bearing capacity of ring foundations in cohesive soils. In particular, for both cases of rough and smooth foundations, Eq. (10) of the original paper cannot make a realistic prediction in terms of the change of undrained bearing capacity when the I k i value varies from 1 to 10. Rather, Eq. (10) of the original paper generates almost constant undrained bearing capacity with all I k i values for each interface condition (i.e., rough I q SB ult sb i 363 kPa and smooth case I q SB ult sb i 93 kPa). [Extracted from the article]

The widely differing factors of safety obtained by strength reduction and load increase in the ultimate bearing capacity of foundations have been reexamined analytically. In most cases, factors of safety based on load increase need to be higher than those based on strength reduction to achieve the same level of safety in design. The greater sensitivity of foundation systems to strength reduction over load increase may impact the choice of factors in ultimate limit state design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Conventional bearing capacity analyses for shallow foundations placed on slopes use a modified set of bearing capacity factors based on soil properties, footing geometry, and slope configuration, but are restricted to purely cohesionless or purely cohesive soils. This approach is adequate for establishing bearing capacity on engineered fills with controlled foundation properties, yet does not adequately address design for bearing capacity on soils that have both cohesion and internal frictional resistance--a common scenario for native soils. This role becomes increasingly important in design for mechanically stabilized earth walls, which are often placed on slopes of native c'-φ' soils in which the bearing capacity can often be the critical design constraint. Prior approaches to bearing capacity on horizontal ground for c'-φ' soils utilize principles of limited state plasticity in their formulation, yet the most commonly applied bearing capacity approaches on slopes use semiempirical formulations that employ mutually exclusive soil strength parameters. In this work, results are attained using upper-bound limit state plasticity failure discretization scheme, known as discontinuity layout optimization (DLO), which uses nonassumptive failure geometry (under translational kinematics) in its formulation. The values presented demonstrate important components in consideration of bearing capacity for strip footings placed adjacent to slopes of c'-φ' soils, in particular, the relationship between soil strength properties, slope height to footing width ratio, slope angle, and critical collapse mechanism. A set of reduction coefficients that can be directly applied to the classical bearing capacity formulation is presented for ease of application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]